Total factor productivity and shareholder returns in banking

Omega

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 241-253

  Fiordelisi, Franco ^a   Molyneux, Phil ^b  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Banking; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Malmquist productivity index; Shareholder value; Value relevance

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; INVESTMENTS; SHAREHOLDERS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSE; LISTED BANKS; MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX; SHAREHOLDER RETURNS; SHAREHOLDER VALUES; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY; VALUE CREATION; VALUE DRIVERS; VALUE RELEVANCES;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 77953688040     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Berger A.N., Mester L.J. Explaining the dramatic changes in the performance of US banks: technological change, deregulation, and dynamic changes in competition. Journal of Financial Intermediation 2003, 12:57-95.
2. Greenspan A. Remarks at the annual convention of American Bankers Association. Honolulu, Hawaii, October 5, 1996.
3. Beccalli E., Casu B., Girardone C. Efficiency and stock performance in European Banking. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 2006, 33(1-2):245-262.
4. Fernández AI, Gascón F, González E. Economic efficiency and value maximization in the banking firms. Paper presented to the 7th European workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Oviedo, September 2002.
5. Eisenbeis RA, Ferrier GD, Kwan SH. The Informativeness of Stochastic Frontier and Programming Frontier efficiency scores: cost efficiency and other measures of bank holding company performance. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper, 1999, p. 99-123.
6. Chu S.F., Lim G.H. Share performance and profit efficiency of banks in an oligopolistic market: evidence from Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 1998, 8:155-168.
7. Fiordelisi F. Shareholder value efficiency in banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 2007, 31(7):2151-2171.
8. Spong K, Sullivan R, DeYoung R. What makes a bank efficient? A look at financial characteristics and bank management and ownership structure, financial and industry perspectives. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1-19, December 1995.
9. Berger A.N., Mester L.J. Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiency of financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance 1997, 21:895-947.
10. Girardone C., Gardener E.P.M., Molyneux P. Analysing the determinants of bank efficiency-the case of Italian Banks. Applied Economics 2004, 36:215-227.
11. Stiroh K.J. How did bank holding companies prosper in the 1990's?. Journal of Banking and Finance 2000, 24:1703-1745.
12. Casu B., Girardone C., Molyneux P. Productivity change in banking: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches. Journal of Banking and Finance 2004, 28:2521-2540.
13. Goddard J.A., Molyneux P., Wilson J.O.S., Tavakoli M. Developments in European banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 2007, 31(7):1911-1935.
14. Altunbas Y., Evans L., Molyneux P. Ownership and efficiency in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 2001, 33:926-954.
15. Green WH. The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS, editors. The measurement of productive efficiency. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring for efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
17. Farrell M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1957, CXX(Part 3):253-290.
18. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30:1078-1092.
19. Ali A.I., Seiford L.M. The mathematical programming approach to efficiency analysis. The measurement of productive efficiency 1993, 120-159. Oxford University Press, Oxford. H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, S.S. Schmidt (Eds.).
20. Coelli T. A multi-stage methodology for the solution of oriented DEA models. CEPA working paper, no. 1, 1998.
21. O'Hanlon J., Peasnell K. Wall Street's contribution to management accounting: the Stern Stewart EVA financial management system. Management Accounting Research 1998, 9:421-444.
22. Garvey G.T., Milbourn T.T. EVA versus earnings: doe it matter which is more highly correlated with stock returns?. Journal of Accounting Research 2000, 38:209-245.
23. Kyriazis D., Anastassis C. The validity of the economic value added approach: an empirical application. European Financial Management 2007, 13:71-100.
24. El Mir A., Seboui S. Corporate governance and earnings management and the relationship between economic value added and created shareholder value. Journal of Asset Management 2006, 7:242-254.
25. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2001, 31:3-75.
26. Holthausen R.W., Watts R.L. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2001, 31:3-75.
27. Ohlson J.A. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 1995, 11:661-687.
28. Felthman G., Ohlson J.A. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 1995, 11:689-731.
29. Morel M. Multi-lagged specification of the Ohlson model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 1999, 12:147-161.
30. Dechow P.M., Hutton A.P., Sloan R.G. An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1999, 26:1-34.
31. Lo K., Lys T. The Ohlson model: contribution to valuation theory, limitations, and empirical applications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 2000, 15:337-367.
32. Ahmed A.S., Morton R.M., Schaefer T.F. Accounting conservatism and the valuation of accounting numbers: evidence on the Felthman-Ohlson (1996) model. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 2000, 15:271-292.
33. Liu J., Ohlson J.A. The Feltham-Ohlson (1995) model: empirical implications. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 2000, 15:321-331.
34. Biddle G.C., Chen P., Zhang G. When capital follows profitability: non linear residual income dynamics. Review of Accounting Studies 2001, 6:229-265.
35. Ota K. A test of the Ohlson (1995) model: empirical evidence from Japan. International Journal of Accounting 2002, 37:157-182.
36. Berger A.N. Distribution-free estimates of efficiency in the US banking system and tests of the standard distributional assumptions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1993, 4:261-283.
37. Altunmas Y., Chakravarty S. Frontier cost functions and bank efficiency. Economic Letters 2001, 72:233-240.
38. Bauer PW, Berger AN, Ferrier GD, Humphrey DB. Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods. The Federal Reserve Board, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, no. 1997-50, 1997.
39. Sathye M. X-efficiency in Australian banking: an empirical investigation. Journal of Banking and Finance 2001, 25:613-630.
40. Green W.H., Segal D. Profitability and efficiency in the U.S. life insurance industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2004, 21:229-247.
41. Fiordelisi F., Molyneux P. Efficiency in the factoring industry. Applied Economics 2004, 36:947-959.
42. Beccalli E. Cross-country comparisons of efficiency: evidence from the UK and Italian investment firms. Journal of Banking and Finance 2004, 28:1363-1383.
43. Kosmidou K., Pasiouras F., Zopounidis C., Doumpos M. A multivariate analysis of the financial characteristics of foreign and domestic banks in the UK. Omega 2006, 34(2):189-195.
44. Dietsch M., Lozano-Vives A. How the environment determines banking efficiency: a comparison between French and Spanish industries. Journal of Banking and Finance 2000, 24:985-1004.
45. Berger A.N., De Young R. The effect of geographic expansion on bank efficiency. Journal of Financial Service Research 2001, 19:163-184.
46. Chaffai M.E., Dietsch M., Lozano-Vivas A. Technological and environmental differences in the European banking industries. Journal of Financial Services Research 2001, 19:147-162.
47. Carbo S, Humphrey DB. Opening the black box: finding the source of cost inefficiency. Paper presented at the annual conference of the European Association of University Teachers in Banking and Finance, Krakow University, September 2004.
48. Avkiran NK. Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: an illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data. Omega, 2009;27:535-44.
49. Das A., Ray S.C., Nag A. Labor-use efficiency in Indian banking: a branch-level analysis. Omega 2009, 37(2):411-425.
50. Fernández P. EVA, Economic profit and cash value added do not measure shareholder value creation. University of Navarra, IESE, Research paper no. 453, 2002.
51. Aly H.Y., Grabowski R., Pasurka C., Rangan N. Technical, scale and allocative efficiencies in US banking an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 1990, 72:211-218.
52. Hancock D. A model of the financial firm with imperfect asset and deposit elasticities. Journal of Banking and Finance 1986, 10:37-54.
53. Wilson P.W. Detecting influential observations in data envelopment analysis. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 1995, 6:27-45.
54. Camanho A.S., Dyson R.G. A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings. Omega 2008, 36(1):147-162.
55. Seiford L.M. Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis 1996, 7:99-137.
56. Førsund F.R., Sarafoglou N. On the origins of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2002, 17:23-40.
57. Fiordelisi F., Molyneux P. Shareholder value in banking 2006, Palgrave Macmillan.
58. Grosskopf S. Efficiency and productivity. The measurement of productive efficiency 1993, 160-194. Oxford University Press, New York. H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, S.S. Schmidt (Eds.).
59. Griffell-Tatjé E., Lovell C.A.K. A note on Malmquist productivity index. Economic Letters 1995, 47:169-175.
60. Coelli T., Prasada Rao D.S., Battese G.E. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis 1997, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.
61. Amihud Y., Mendelson H., Uno J. Number of shareholders and stock prices: evidence from Japan. Journal of Finance 1999, 54:1169-1184.
62. Baek J.S., Kang J.K., Park K.S. Corporate governance and firm value: evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 2004, 71:265-313.
63. Bates T.W., Lemmon M., Linck J.S. Shareholder wealth effects and bid negotiation in freeze-out deals: are minority shareholders left out in the cold?. Journal of Financial Economics 2006, 81:681-708.
64. Berger A.N. The profit structure relationship in banking - test of market power and efficient structure hypothesis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1995, 27:404-431.
65. Berger A.N., Bonaccorsi di Patti E. Capital structure and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance 2006, 30:1065-1102.
66. Berger A.N., Hannan T.H. The efficiency cost of market power in the banking industry: a test of the "quiet life" and related hypotheses. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80:454-465.
67. Berger AN, Humphrey DB. Measurement and efficiency issues in commercial banking, in output measurement in the service sectors. Griliches Z. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1992. p. 245-79.
68. Di Antonio M. Creazione di valore e controllo strategico nella banca. Bancaria Editrice, Rome, Italy, 2002.
69. Fare R.S., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K. Production frontiers 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
70. Gillan S., Starks L. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 2000, 57:275-305.
71. Gillan S., Kensinger J.W., Martin J.D. Value creation and corporate diversification: the case of Sears, Roebuck and Co. Journal of Financial Economics 2000, 55:103-138.
72. Hausman J.A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978, 46:1251-1271.
73. Kahn C., Winton A. Moral hazard and optimal subsidiary structure for financial institutions. Journal of Finance 2004, 59:2531-2575.
74. Maccario A, Sironi A, Zazzara C. Is banks' cost of equity capital different across countries? Evidence form the G10 countries major banks. SDA Bocconi working papers 2002, 77 pp.
75. Molyneux P. Thornton J. Determinants of European bank profitability - a note. Journal of Banking and Finance 1992, 16:1173-1178.
76. Mulherin J., Poulsen A. Proxy contests and corporate change: implications for shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 1998, 47:279-313.
77. Resti A., Sironi A. Risk management and shareholder value in banking 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.