A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 101-108

  Baker, R C ^a   Talluri, Srinivas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; DECISION MAKING; PRODUCTION CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING (MADM);

COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 0030835107     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(96)00199-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. M. Khouja. The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers Ind. Engng. 28, 123-132 (1995).
2. A. W. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Opl. Res. 2, 429-444 (1978).
3. S. M. Shafer and J. W. Bradford. Efficiency measurements of alternate machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans. Engng. Mgmt. 42, 159-165 (1995).
4. S. Talluri and F. Huq. Application of data envelopment analysis in cell performance evaluation and cell process improvement in cellular manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. (in press)
5. R. G. Dyson and E. Thannassoulis. Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 39, 563-576 (1988).
6. Y. H. B. Wong and J. E. Beasley. Restricting weight flexibility in DEA. J. Opl. Res. Soc. 41, 829-835 (1990).
7. T. R. Sexton, R. H. Slinkman and A. Hogan. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (Edited by R. H. Slinkman). New Directions of Program Evaluation, Jossey Bass, No. 32, San Francisco (1986).
8. J. Doyle and R. Green. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses, J. Opl. Res. Soc. 45, 567-578 (1994).
9. J. Sarkis and S. Talluri. Efficiency valuation and business process improvement through internal benchmarking. J. Engng. Valuation Cost Anal. 1, (1996).