The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its nash equilibrium

Operations Research

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1278-1288

  Liang, Liang ^a   Wu, Jie ^a   Cook, Wade D ^b   Zhu, Joe ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CODES; CROSS EFFICIENCIES; DEA WEIGHTS; DECISION-MAKING UNITS; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; NASH EQUILIBRIUM POINTS; OPTIMAL MULTIPLIERS; PEER EVALUATIONS;

GAME THEORY; OPTIMIZATION; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 61449177907     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: 15265463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1070.0487     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anderson, T. R., K. B. Hollingsworth, L. B. Inman. 2002. The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. J. Productivity Anal. 18(1) 249-255.
2. Becker, R. A., S. K. Chakrabarti. 2005. Satisficing behavior, Brouwer's fixed point theorem and Nash equilibrium. Econom. Theory 26(1) 63-83.
3. Brouwer, L. E. J. 1911. Beweis der Invarianz der Dimensionzahl. Math. Ann. 70 161-165.
4. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 429-444.
5. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, L. M. Seiford, eds. 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Kluwer, Boston.
6. Cook, W. D., M. Kress. 1990. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Sci. 36 1302-1310.
7. Debreu, D. 1952. A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 38 886-893.
8. Despotis, D. K. 2002. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units. J. Oper: Res. Soc. 53 314-325.
9. Doyle, J., R. Green. 1994. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45(5) 567-578.
10. Glicksberg, I. L. 1952. A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 38 170-174.
11. Green, R., J. Doyle, W. Cook. 1996. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. Eur: J. Oper. Res. 90 461-472.
12. Oral, M., O. Kettani, P. Lang. 1991. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Sci. 37(7) 871-883.
13. Sexton, T. R., R. H. Silkman, A. J. Hogan. 1986. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. R. H. Silkman, ed. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Vol. 32. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 73-105.