Quantification of Aortic Regurgitant Fraction and Volume with Multi-detector Computed Tomography. Comparison with Echocardiography

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 334-342

  Feuchtner, Gudrun M ^a,b   Spoeck, Alexander ^a   Lessick, Jonathan ^c   Dichtl, Wolfgang ^a   Plass, Andrè ^b   Leschka, Sebastian ^b   Mueller, Silvana ^a   Klauser, Andrea ^a   Scheffel, Hans ^b   Wolf, Florian ^d   Jaschke, Werner ^a,e   Alkadhi, Hatem ^b,e  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic regurgitant volume; Aortic regurgitation; Automated 3 D volume segmentation; Multislice computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79551571069     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Chatterjee K., et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:e1-e148.
2. Dujardin K.S., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., et al. Mortality and morbidity of aortic regurgitation in clinical practice. A long-term follow-up study. Circulation 1999, 99:1851-1857.
3. Taniguchi K., Nakano S., Kawashima Y., et al. Left ventricular ejection performance, wall stress, and contractile state in aortic regurgitation before and after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1990, 82:798-807.
4. Miyake Y., Hozumi T., Mori I., et al. Automated quantification of aortic regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction using the digital colour Doppler velocity profile integration method in patients with aortic regurgitation. Heart 2002, 88:481-484.
5. Detaint D., Messika-Zeitoun D., Maalouf J., et al. Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:1-11.
6. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1724-1732.
7. Janne d'Othée B., Siebert U., Cury R., et al. A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol 2008, 65:449-641.
8. Meijboom W.B., Mollet N.R., Van Mieghem C.A., et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1658-1665.
9. Scheffel H., Leschka S., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100:701-706.
10. Alkadhi H., Desbiolles L., Husmann L., et al. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-Section CT. Radiology 2007, 245:111-121.
11. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Schachner T., et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT in detecting aortic valve regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 186:1676-1681.
12. Feuchtner G.M., Dichtl W., Müller S., et al. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 1:W1-W7.
13. Jassal D.S., Shapiro M.D., Neilan T.G., et al. 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:507-512.
14. Li X., Tang L., Zhou L., et al. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 25:591-600.
15. Dewey M., Müller M., Eddicks S., et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:2034-2044.
16. Abadi S., Roguin A., Engel A., et al. Feasibility of automatic assessment of four-chamber cardiac function with MDCT: initial clinical application and validation. Eur J Radiol 2009 Mar 2, (Epub ahead of print).
17. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Cramer C.M., et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006. Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475-1497.
18. Cheitlin M.D., Alpert J.S., Armstrong W.F., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. Circulation 1997, 95:1686-1744.
19. Scheffel H., Alkadhi H., Leschka S., et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008 Jun 2, (Epub ahead of print).
20. Reiter S.J., Rumberger J.A., Stanford W., et al. Quantitative determination of aortic regurgitant volumes in dogs by ultrafast computed tomography. Circulation 1987, 76:728-735.
21. Rosen B.D., Edvardsen T., Lai S., et al. Left ventricular concentric remodeling is associated with decreased global and regional systolic function: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2005, 112:984-991.
22. Taniguchi K., Takahashi T., Toda K., et al. Left ventricular mass: impact on left ventricular contractile function and its reversibility in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007, 32:588-595.
23. Pattynama P.M., Lamb H.J., Van der Velde E.A., et al. Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Reson Imaging 1995, 3:53-63.
24. Bruners P., Mahnken A.H., Knackstedt C., et al. Assessment of global left and right ventricular function using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in comparison to MRI: an experimental study in a porcine model. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:756-764.
25. Dourvas I.N., Parharidis G.E., Efthimiadis K., et al. Right ventricular diastolic function in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2004, 93:115-117.
26. Abbara S., Chow B.J., Pena A.J., et al. Assessment of left ventricular function with 16- and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2008, 67:481-486.
27. Annuar B.R., Liew C.K., Chin S.P., et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 2008, 65:112-119.
28. Wu Y.W., Tadamura E., Kanao S., et al. Left ventricular functional analysis using 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with left ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiology 2007, 109:135-142.
29. van der Vleuten P.A., Willems T.P., Götte M.J., et al. Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. A meta-analysis and review of the current literature. Acta Radiol 2006, 47:1049-1057.
30. Belge B., Coche E., Pasquet A., et al. Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:1424-1433.
31. Mor-Avi V., Sugeng L., Weinert L., et al. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2004, 110:1814-1818.
32. Hausleiter J., Meyer T., Hadamitzky M., et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006, 113:1305-1310.
33. Stolzmann P., Scheffel H., Schertler T., et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:592-599.
34. Waroux de Polain J.B., Pouleur A.C., Goffinet C., et al. Functional anatomy of aortic regurgitation: accuracy, prediction of surgical repairablity, and outcome implications of transesophaeal echocardioraphy. Circulation 2007, 116:264-269.
35. Cawley P., Maki J., Catherine O.M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validation. Circulation 2009, 119:468-478.
36. Bettencourt N., Rocha J., Carvalho M., et al. Multislice computed tomography in the exclusion of coronary artery disease in patients with presurgical valve disease. Circulation Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:306-313.
37. Feuchtner G.M., Alkadhi H., Karlo C., et al. Cardiac CT angiography for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse: comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 2010, 254:374-383.