Assessment of global left and right ventricular function using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in comparison to MRI: An experimental study in a porcine model

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 756-764

  Bruners, Philipp ^a,b   Mahnken, Andreas H ^a,b   Knackstedt, Christian ^b   Luhmann, Nadja ^b   Spüntrup, Elmar ^b   Das, Marco ^b   Hohl, Christian ^b   Wildberger, Joachim E ^b   Schmitz Rode, Thomas ^a   Günther, Rolf W ^b   Mühlenbruch, Georg ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac imaging; Dual source CT; Ventricular function

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VOLUME; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT T TEST; SWINE;

EID: 37349062021     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3180cc206f     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:331-336.
2. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary artery disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation. 1979;59:421-430.
3. Julliere Y, Barbier G, Feldmann L, et al. Additional predictive value of both left and right ventricular ejection fractions on long-term survival in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:276-280.
4. Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, et al. Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnet resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1813-1822.
5. Rerkpattanapipat O, Mazur W, Link KM, et al. Assessment of cardiac function with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2003;11:67-80.
6. Dewey M, Muller M, Eddicks S, et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2034-2044.
7. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234:381-390.
8. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, et al. Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1288-1294.
9. Delhaye D, Remy-Jardin M, Teisseire A, et al. MDCT of right ventricular function: comparison of right ventricular ejection fraction estimation and equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography, part I. AJR. 2006;187:1597-1604.
10. Dogan H, Kroft LJ, Huisman MV, et al. Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography- synchronized multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2007;242:78-84.
11. Flohr T, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256-268.
12. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, et al. MR imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolution on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology. 2002;223:263-269.
13. Juergens KU, Fischbach R, Grude M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial function by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT in comparison to cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S191.
14. Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging - study in pigs. Radiology. 2005;236:112-117.
15. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2003;230:403- 410.
16. Bland JM, Altmann DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;8476:307-310.
17. Hibberd MG, Chuang ML, Beaudin RA, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography with unrestricted selection of imaging planes for measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Am Heart J. 2000;140:469-475.
18. Kuhl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, et al. High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2083-2090.
19. Buck T, Hunold P, Wentz KU, et al. Tomographic three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of chamber size and systolic function in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, cineventriculography, and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1997;96:4286-4297.
20. Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1387-1396.
21. Gerber TC, Behrenbeck T, Allison T, et al. Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc-99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1022-1026.
22. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Ballew DW, et al. The use of biplane angiocardiography for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1960;60:762-776.
23. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology. 2000;217:572-575.
24. Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:650-659.
25. Anagnostopoulos C, Gunning MG, Davie G, et al. Simultaneous biplane first-pass radionuclide ventriculography using Tc-tetrofosmin: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 1998;19:435-444.
26. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT - initial experience. Radiology. 2000;217:546-571.
27. Hong C, Becker CR, Huber A, et al. ECG-gated reconstructed multidetector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. Radiology. 2001;220:712-717.
28. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable non-invasive coronary angiography with fast submilimeter mulislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.
29. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:714-720.
30. Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation. 2006;114:654-661.
31. Wiese TH, Rogalla P, Taupitz M, et al. Assessment of left ventricular volumes and function: intraindividual comparison of multi-slice spiral CT and electron beam CT in an animal model. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:819-827.
32. Dewey M, Muller M, Teige F, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:400-409.
33. Mahnken AH, Hohl C, Suess C, et al. Influence of heart rate and temporal resolution on left-ventricular volumes in cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography: a phantom study. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:429-435.
34. Koch K, Oellig F, Oberholzer K, et al. Assessment of right ventricular function by 16-detector-row CT: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:312-318.
35. Lembcke A, Dohmen PM, Dewey M, et al. Multislice computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of right ventricular volumes and function: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1344-1351.
36. Raman SV, Cook SC, McCarthy B, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography to quantify right ventricular size and function in adults with either tetralogy of Fallot or transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:683-686.
37. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, et al. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J. 2006;151:736-744.
38. Kim TH, Ryu YU, Hur J, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular volume and mass using retrospective ECG-gated cardiac multidetector computed tomography: comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1987-1993.
39. Dogan H, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, et al. MDCT assessment of right ventricular systolic function. AJR. 2006;186(6 Suppl 2):S366-S370.
40. Flohr T, Stierdorfer K, Raupach R, et al. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT-system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo. 2004;176:1803-1810.
41. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0. 33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:436-442.
42. Reimann AJ, Rinck D, Birinci-Aydogan A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography: advances of improved temporal resolution in coronary plaque imaging. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:196-203.
43. Ritchie CJ, Godwin JD, Crawford CR, et al. Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. Radiology. 1992;185:37-42.
44. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Dual source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1409-1415.
45. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual source coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2739-2747.
46. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and non-obstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:147-154.
47. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081-1086.