In vivo analysis of ciliary muscle morphologic changes with accommodation and axial ametropia

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6882-6889

  Sheppard, Amy L ^a   Davies, Leon N ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ANTERIOR SEGMENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CILIARY MUSCLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PILOT STUDY; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; BIOMETRY; CILIARY BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; PILOT PROJECTS; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551560661     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5787     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Atchison DA. Accommodation and presbyopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995;15(4):255-272.
2. Croft MA, Glasser A, PL Kaufman. Accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2001;41(2):33- 46.
3. Coleman DJ. On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:846-868.
4. Charman WN. The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(3):207-225.
5. von Helmholtz H. Uber die akkommodation des auges. Arch Ophthalmol. 1855;1:1-74.
6. Glasser A, Wendt M, Ostrin LA. Accommodative changes in lens diameter in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(1):278 -286.
7. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Edinger-Westphal and pharmacologically stimulated accommodative refractive changes and lens and ciliary process movements in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84(2): 302-313.
8. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:863-872.
9. Ehrmann K, Ho A, Parel J-M. Biomechanical analysis of the accommodative apparatus in primates. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(3):302-312.
10. Pardue MT, Sivak JG. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(4):204 -210.
11. Park K-H, Yun J-H, Kee C. The effect of cataract extraction on the contractility of ciliary muscle. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):8-14.
12. Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Guo S. Magnetic resonance imaging of aging, accommodating, phakic, and pseudophakic ciliary muscle diameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(11):1792-1798.
13. Neider MW, Crawford K, Kaufman PL, Bito LZ. In vivo videography of the rhesus monkey accommodative apparatus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(1):69 -74.
14. Koretz JF, Neider MW, Kaufman PL, et al. Slitlamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye I: survey of the anterior segment. Exp Eye Res. 1987;44(2):307-318.
15. Ostrin LA, Glasser A. Effects of pharmacologically manipulated amplitude and starting point on Edinger-Westphal-stimulated accommodative dynamics in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(1):313-320.
16. Koretz JF, Bertasso AM, Neider MW, et al. Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res. 1987; 45(2):317-326.
17. Wasilewski R, McDonald JP, Heatley G, et al. Surgical intervention and accommodative responses II: forward ciliary body accommodative movement is facilitated by zonular attachments to the lens capsule. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5495-5502.
18. Kaufman PL, Bito LZ, DeRousseau CJ. The development of presbyopia in primates. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1982;102(3):323-326.
19. Bito LZ, DeRousseau CJ, Kaufman PL, Bito JW. Age-dependent loss of accommodative amplitude in rhesus monkeys: an animal model for presbyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982;23(1):23-31.
20. Vilipuru AS, Glasser A. The relationship between refractive and biometric changes during Edinger-Westphal stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:349-360.
21. Crawford K, Terasawa E, Kaufman PL. Reproducible stimulation of ciliary muscle contraction in the cynomolgus monkey via a permanent indwelling midbrain electrode. Brain Res. 1989;503(2):265-272.
22. Croft MA, McDonald JP, James RJ, et al. Surgical intervention and accommodative responses I: centripetal ciliary body, capsule and lens movements in rhesus monkeys of various ages. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5484-5494.
23. Croft MA, Glasser A, Heatley G, et al. Accommodative ciliary body and lens function in rhesus monkeys I: normal lens, zonule and ciliary process configuration in the iridectomized eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):1076-1086.
24. Croft MA, McDonald JP, Nadkarni NV, et al. Age-related changes in centripetal ciliary body movement relative to centripetal lens movement in monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2009;89(6):824-832.
25. Glasser A, Croft MA, Brumback L, Kaufman PL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the aging rhesus monkey ciliary region. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(6):417- 424.
26. Poyer JF, Kaufman PL, Flügel C. Age does not affect contractile responses of the isolated rhesus monkey ciliary muscle to muscarinic agonists. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12(5):413- 422.
27. Tamm E, Croft MA, Jungkunz W, et al. Age-related loss of ciliary muscle mobility in the rhesus monkey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(6):871- 876.
28. Tamm E, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz W, Rohen JW. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, presbyopic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(5):1678-1692.
29. Tamm E, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Ciliary body. Micros Res Tech. 1996; 33(5):390-439.
30. Aiello AL, Tran VT, Rao NA. Postnatal development of the ciliary body and pars plana. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(6):802- 805.
31. Streeten BW. Ciliary body. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Biomedical Foundations of Ophthalmology, Vol. 1. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co.; 1988: chap 2.
32. Ma J, Chen X. Dynamic changes of configuration and position of human ciliary body during accommodation (in Chinese). Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2004;40:590-596.
33. Muftuoglu O, Hosal BM, Zilelioglu G. Ciliary body thickness in unilateral high axial myopia. Eye. 2009;23(5):1176-1181.
34. Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ciliary body thickness increases with increasing axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140(2):324 -325.
35. Bailey MD, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO. Ciliary body thickness and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(10): 4353-4360.
36. van Alphen GW. Choroidal stretch and emmetropization. Vision Res. 1986;26(5):723-734.
37. Schultz KE, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Bailey MD. Accommodative fluctuations, lens tension and ciliary body thickness in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):677- 684.
38. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(4):73-278.
39. Langaas T, Riddell PM, Ystenaes AE, et al. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(1):37- 48.
40. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. A unifying theory of refractive error development. Bull Math Biol. 2000;62(6):1087-1108.
41. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(3):690-694.
42. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, et al. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(3):837- 846.
43. Werner L, Lovisolo C, Chew J, et al. Meridional differences in internal dimensions of the anterior segment in human eyes evaluated with 2 imaging systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(7): 1125-1132.
44. Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Semmlow JL, De Marco JK. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of age and accommodation on the human lens cross-sectional area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(2):539-545.
45. Stachs O, Martin H, Kirchhoff A, et al. Monitoring accommodative ciliary muscle function using three-dimensional ultrasound. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(11):906-912.
46. Marchini G, Ghilotti G, Bonadimani M, Babighian S. Effects of 0.005% Latanoprost on ocular anterior structures and ciliary body thickness. J Glaucoma. 2003;12(4):295-300.
47. Konstantopoulos A, Hossain P, Anderson DF. Recent advances in ophthalmic anterior segment imaging: a new era for ophthalmic diagnosis? Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(4):551-557.
48. Fledelius HC, Ultrasound in ophthalmology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23(3):365-375.
49. Nubile M, Calienno R, Lanzini M, Mastropasqua L. Applications for Visante OCT. Cataract Refract Surg Today Europe. 2008. Available online at http://www.crstodayeurope.com/Pages/whichArticle. php?id_323. Accessed February 9, 2010.
50. Richdale K, Bullimore MA, Zadnik K. Lens thickness with age and accommodation by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(5):441-447.
51. Sheppard AL, Davies LN. Clinical Evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010; 30(2):143-151.
52. Stark LR, Atchison DA. Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(5):528 -537.
53. Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN. Age-related changes in static accommodation and accommodative miosis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(4):342-352.
54. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EAH, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(4):458-462.
55. Mallen EAH, Kashyap P, Hampson KM. Transient axial length change during the accommodation response in young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):1251-1254.
56. Tearney GJ, Brezinski ME, Southern JF, et al. Determination of the refractive index of highly scattering human tissue by optical coherence tomography. Optics Lett. 1995;20(21):2258-2261.
57. Dirckx JJ, Kuypers LC, Decraemer WF. Refractive index of tissue measured with confocal microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10(4):044014.
58. Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, et al. Assessment of the scleral spur in anterior segment optical coherence tomography images. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(2):181-185.
59. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307-317.
60. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
61. von Helmholtz H. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Vol. 1. 3rd ed. 1909. Translated by Southall JPC. New York, Dover; 1924:143-172.
62. Strenk SA, Strenk LM, Guo S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the anteroposterior position and thickness of the aging, accommodating, phakic and pseudophakic ciliary muscle. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(2):235-241.
63. Baïkoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, Wei J. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(9):1843-1850.
64. Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN. Peripheral refraction measurement: does it matter if one turns the eye or the head? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(1):73-82.
65. Mathur A, Atchison DA, Kasthurirangan S, et al. The influence of oblique viewing on axial and peripheral refraction for emmetropes and myopes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(2):155-161.