Ciliary body thickness in unilateral high axial myopia

Eye

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1176-1181

  Muftuoglu, O ^a,b   Hosal, B M ^a   Zilelioglu, G ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial length; Ciliary body thickness; Ciliary muscle thickness; Ciliary process thickness; High myopia; Ultrasound biomicroscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; BIOMICROSCOPY; CHILD; CILIARY BODY; CILIARY MUSCLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HIGH MYOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; SCHOOL CHILD; THICKNESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; BIOMETRY; CHILD; CILIARY BODY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MYOPIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65949121375     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: 14765454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.178     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Carney L, Mainstone J, Henderson B. Corneal topography and myopia: a cross-sectional study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 311-320.
2. Grosvenor T, Scott R. Role of the axial length/corneal radius ratio in determining the refractive state of the eye. Optom and Vis Sci 1994; 71: 573-579.
3. Llorente L, Barbero S, Cano D, Dorronsoro C, Marcos S. Myopic versus hyperopic eyes: axial length, corneal shape and optical aberrations. J Vis 2004; 4: 288-298.
4. Cheng HM, Singh OS, Kwong KK, Xiong J, Woods BT, Brady TJ. Shape of the myopic eye as seen with highresolution magnetic resonance imaging. Optom and Vis Sci 1992; 69: 670-698.
5. Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL, Pritchard N, Pope JM, Strugnell WE et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3380-3386.
6. Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Fusaro RE, Friedman NE, Sholtz RI, Adams AJ. Optical and structural development of the crystalline lens in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 120-133.
7. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Fusaro RE, Adams AJ. Longitudinal evidence of crystalline lens thinning in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 1581-1587.
8. Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy of the Eye, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1995, pp 3-16.
9. Tello C, Liebmann J, Potash SD, Cohen H, Ritch R. Measurement of ultrasound biomicroscopy images: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 3549-3552.
10. Gohdo T, Tsumura T, Iijima H, Kashiwagi K, Tsukahara S. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of ciliary body thickness in eyes with narrow angles. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 342-346.
11. Mishima HK, Shoge K, Takamatsu M, Kiuchi Y, Tanaka J. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of ciliary body thickness after topical application of pharmacologic agents. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 121: 319-321.
12. Bacskulin A, Gast R, Bergmann U, Guthoff R. Ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging of accommodative configuration changes in the presbyopic ciliary body. Ophthalmologe 1996; 93: 199-203.
13. Oliveira C, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Ciliary body thickness increases with increasing axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 324-325.
14. Tamm S, Tamm E, Rohen JW. Age-related changes of the human ciliary muscle: a quantitative morphometric study. Mech Ageing Dev 1992; 62: 209-221.
15. Lutjen-Drecoll E, Tamm E, Kaufman PL. Age-related loss of morphologic responses to pilocarpine in rhesus monkey ciliary muscle. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 1591-1598.
16. Weinreb RN, Toris CB, Gabelt BT, Lindsey JD, Kaufman PL. Effects of prostoglandins on the aqueous humor outflow pathways. Surv Ophthalmol 2002; 47: 53-64.
17. Coca-Prados M, Edcribano J. New perspectives in aqueous humor secretion and in glaucoma: the ciliary body as a multifunctional neuroendocrine gland. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007; 26: 239-262.
18. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A (eds). Adler's Physiology of the Eye, 10th edn. Mosby: St. Louis, MO, 2003, pp 195-233.
19. Glasser A, Croft MA, Brumback L, Kaufman PL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the aging rhesus monkey ciliary region. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78: 417-424.
20. Glasser A, Kaufman PL. The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 863-872.
21. Strenk SA, Semmlow JL, Strenk LM, Munoz P, Gronlund-Jacob J, DeMarco JK. Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 1162-1169.
22. Arakawa A, Tamai M. Ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of the human ciliary body after 1 and 2% pilocarpine instillation. Ophthalmologica 2000; 214: 253-259.
23. Wallman J, Winawer J. Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia. Neuron 2004; 43: 447-468.
24. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. A unifying theory of refractive error development. Bull Math Biol 2000; 62: 1087-1108.
25. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 448-456.
26. Smith EL, Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res 1999; 39: 1415-1435.
27. Hung LF, Wallman J, Smith EL. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1259-1269.
28. Tamm E, Lutjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz W, Rohen JW. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, presbyopic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 1678-1692.
29. Jones LA, Mitchell GL, Mutti DO, Hayes JR, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2317-2327.
30. Bacskulin A, Gast R, Bergmann U, Guthoff R. Ultrasound biomicroscopy imaging of accommodative configuration changes in the presbyopic ciliary body. Ophthalmologe 1996; 93: 199-203.
31. Marchini G, Pagliarusco A, Toscano A, Tosi R, Brunelli C, Bonomi L. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2091-2098.
32. Trindade F, Pereira F, Cronemberger S. Ultrasound biomicroscopic imaging of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: 497-503.
33. Castanheira VRC, Zanoto A, Malta RFS, Betinjanea J. Ultrasound biomicroscopic (UBM) quantitative analysis of ocular changes during accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: S564.
34. Goldschmidt E, Fledelius H. High myopia progression and visual impairment in a nonselected group of Danish 14-year-olds followed over 40 years. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 239-243.
35. Weiss AH. Unilateral high myopia: optical components, associated factors, and visual outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 1025-1031.
36. Pollard ZF, Manley D. Long-term results in the treatment of unilateral high myopia with amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78: 397-399.
37. Sanfillipo S, Muchnick RS, Schlossman A. Visual acuity and binocularity in unilateral high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 90: 553-557.
38. Rosenthal AR, Von Noorden GK. Clinical findings and therapy in unilateral high myopia associated with amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1971; 78: 397-399.
39. Nucci P, Drack AV. Refractive surgery for unilateral high myopia in children. J AAPOS 2001; 5: 348-351.
40. Lesueur L, Arne JL. Phakic intraocular lens to correct high myopic amblyopia in children. J Refract Surg 2002; 18: 519-523.