Diagnostic accuracy of the barthel index for measuring activities of daily living outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: Does early poststroke timing of assessment matter?

Stroke

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 342-346

  Kwakkel, Gert ^a,b   Veerbeek, Janne M ^a   Harmeling Van Der Wel, Barbara C ^c   Van Wegen, Erwin ^a   Kollen, Boudewijn J ^d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ADL; Barthel Index; stroke prognosis; stroke units

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79251627627     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599035     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996; 25:479-489.
2. Gordon N, Gulanick M, Costa F, Fletcher G, Franklin B, Roth E, Shephard T, American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention: the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Stroke. 2004;35: 1230-1240. (Pubitemid 38543549)
3. Duncan P, Jorgensen H, Wade D. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke. 2000;31:1429-1438.
4. Sulter G, Steen C, de Keyser J. Use of the Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1538-1541.
5. Kasner S. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:603-612.
6. Collin C, Wade D, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:61-63.
7. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
8. Wade D, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10:64-67.
9. Kwon S, Hartzema A, Duncan P, Min-Lai S. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2004;35: 918-923.
10. Johnston K, Connors AJ, Wagner D, Haley EJ. Predicting outcome in ischemic stroke: external validation of predictive risk models. Stroke. 2003;34:200-202.
11. Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart R, Vroomen P, de Keyser J, Luijckx G. Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel Index and the modified Rankin scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2005;36: 1984-1987.
12. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD000197.
13. Govan L, Langhorne P, Weir C. Categorizing stroke prognosis using different stroke scales. Stroke. 2009;40:3396-3399.
14. Huybrechts K, Caro J. The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:1627-1636.
15. Tilling K, Sterne J, Rudd A, Glass T, Wityk R, Wolfe C. A new method for predicting recovery after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2867-2873.
16. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2248-2253.
17. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of arm and leg training in stroke patients: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:474-480.
18. Van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks H, Van der Wees P, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-862.
19. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337:1521-1526.
20. De Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, Bouter L. How to measure comorbidity. A critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:221-219.
21. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek J, van Wegen E, Nijland R, Harmeling-van der Wel B, Dippel D, EPOS Investigators. Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: does timing of early assessment matter? J Neurol Sci. 2010;294:57-61.
22. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Grotta J, Broderick J, Olson S, Shaw S, Spilker J, Meyer B, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable. Stroke. 2005;36:2446-2449.
23. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke. 2005;36:2676-2680.
24. Nijland R, van Wegen E, Verbunt J, van Wijk R, van Kordelaar J, Kwakkel G. A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:694-696.
25. Hanley J, McNeil B. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:843.
26. Adams HJ, del Zoppo G, Alberts M, Bhatt D, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb R, Higashida R, Jauch E, Kidwell C, Lyden P, Morgenster L, Qureshi A, Rosenwasser R, Scott P, Wijdicks E, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Clinical Cardiology Council, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Working Group, Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation. 2007;115:e478-e534.
27. US Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Panel. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 16. 1995;18:248.
28. Van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the functional independence measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:480-484.
29. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnson J, Rossiter D, Petruckevich A, Thompson A. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:10-14.
30. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: a prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:262-268.
31. Hankey G, Spiesser J, Hakimi Z, Carita P, Gabriel S. Time frame and predictors of recovery from disability following recurrent ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2007;68:202-205. (Pubitemid 46105738)
32. Ng Y, Stein J, Ning M, Black-Schafer R. Comparison of clinical characteristics and functional outcomes of ischemic stroke in different vascular territories. Stroke. 2007;38:2309-2314.
33. Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx G, Vroomen P, Stewart R, De Keyser J. Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between the modified Rankin Scale and the Barthel Index. J Neurol. 2007;254:1113-1117.
34. Sainsbury A, Seebas G, Bansal A, Young JB. Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people. Age Ageing. 2005;34:228-232.
35. Hsueh I, Wang W, Sheu C, Hsieh C. Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:721-726.
36. Van Hartingsveld F, Lucas C, Kwakkel G, Lindeboom R. Improved interpretation of stroke trial results using empirical Barthel item weights. Stroke. 2006;37:162-166.
37. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281-299.