Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty

Journal of Educators Online

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Gautreau, Cynthia ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251622554     PISSN: 1547500X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.9743/JEO.2011.1.2     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2010 from, http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/ learningondemand.pdf
2. Anglin, G. J.(1995). Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed.). London: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Ayers, C., & Doherty, B. (2003). Integrating instructional technology across the campus. Leadership Abstracts, 16(1), 2-7.
4. Baldwin, R. G. (1998). Technology's impact on faculty life and work. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 76, 7-21.
5. Bates, A. W. (2000). Teaching, learning and the impact of multimedia technologies. Educause Review, 35(5), 38-44.
6. Betts, K. S. (1998). Factors influencing faculty participation in distance education in postsecondary education in the United States: An institutional study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
7. Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 3-6.
8. Chyung, S. (2005). Analyze motivation-hygiene factors to improve satisfaction levels of your online training program. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://ipt.Boisestate.edu/faculty/ YChyung.htm
9. Commission on Instructional Technology. (1970). To improve learning. A report to the President and the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: Commission on Instructional Technology.
10. Covington, D., Petherbridge, D., & Warren, S. E. (2005). Best practices: A triangulated support approach in transitioning faculty to online teaching. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1), 3-14.
11. Diamond, R. M. (2002). Faculty, instructional and organizational development: Options and choices. In K. Gillespie, A guide to faculty development: Practical advice, examples, and resources (pp. 2-9). Boston: Anker.
12. Edelstein, S., & Edwards, J. (2002). If you build it, they will come: Building learning communities through threaded discussions. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www. westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring51.html
13. Frayer, D. A. (1999). Creating a campus culture to support a teaching and learning revolution. Cause/Effect Journal, 22(2), 6-19.
14. Frazee, R. V. (2003). Using relevance to facilitate online participation in a hybrid course. Educause Quarterly, 4, 67-69.
15. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Toronto, ON: Irwin.
16. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 53-62.
17. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Hood, P. (2002). Perspectives on knowledge utilization in education. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/perspectives.pdf
19. Jafari, A., McGee, P., & Carmean, C. (2006). Managing courses defining learning: What faculty, students, and administrators want. Educause Review, 50-70.
20. Johnson, J. D. (2000). Levels of success in implementing information technologies. Innovative Higher Education, 25(1), 59-76.
21. Klemm, W. R. (1998). Eight ways to get students more engaged in online conferences. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A1997.cfm
22. Lam, W. (2004). Encouraging online participation. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 345-348.
23. Laster, S. (2005). Model-driven design: Systematically building integrated blended learning experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(5), 23-40.
24. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. New York: Routledge.
25. Lawler, P. A., & King, K. P. (2003). New perspectives on designing and implementing professional development of teachers of adults. Chester, PA: Widener University.
26. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, satisfaction. British Journal of Education Technology, 32(2), 153-160.
27. MacDonald, J. K., Yanchar, S.C., & Osguthrope, R. T. (2005). Addressing faculty concerns about distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1-12.
28. McMillan, M., & Schumacher, R. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman
29. Mendenhall, W., Beaver, R., & Beaver, B. (1994). Introduction to probability and statistics (9th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
30. Morgan, G., & Hill, P. (2005). CSU academic technology research bulletin #4: A summary of the learning management systems summits conducted October 2005. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://iacc.calpoly.edu/Document/2005-06/CSU-AT-Research-Bulletin-2.pdf
31. Mullinix, B. B., & McCurry, D. (2003). Balancing the learning equation: Exploring effective mixtures of technology, teaching, and learning. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://technologysource.org/article/balancing_the_learning_equation/
32. Oakley, B. (2004). The value of online learning: Perspectives from the University of Illinois at Springfield. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(3), 22-32.
33. Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G. E. (2005). Supervision for today's schools. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
34. O'Quinn, L., & Corry, M. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4).
35. Pankowski, P. (2004). Faculty training for online teaching. Technology in Higher Education Journal Online, 3-10.
36. Patterson, D. (2004). Encouraging and assisting faculty incorporation of innovative classroom technologies. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA, October 10-13, 2004. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/ siguccs/siguccs2004.html
37. Pittinsky, M. (2004). The networked learning environment. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://library.blackboard.com/docs/AS/Bb_Whitepaper_NLE.pdf
38. Quick, D., & Davies, T. G. (1999). Community college faculty development: Bringing technology into instruction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 641-653.
39. Richlin, L. (2006). Blueprint for learning: Constructing college courses to facilitate, assess and document learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
40. rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
41. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
42. Rogers, E., & Scott, K. L. (1997). The diffusion of innovations model and outreach from the national network of libraries of medicine to Native American Communities. Retrieved November 21, 2005, from http://nnlm.gov/pnr/eval/rogers.html
43. Saettler, P. (1968). A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Schifter, C. C. (2000). Faculty participation in asynchronous learning networks: A case study of motivating and inhibiting factors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(1), 15-22.
45. Simpson, M., & Payne, F. (1999). Using information and communications technology as a pedagogical tool: Who educates the educators? Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(3), 248-262.
46. Smith, K. L. (1996). Preparing faculty for instructional technology: From education to development to creative independence. Paper presented at 1996 CAUSE Annual Conference. Retrieved June 11, 2006, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/CNC9659.pdf
47. Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1-30.
48. Spicer, D. Z., & DeBlois, P. B. (2004). Current IT issues 2004. Educause Review, 13-26.
49. Surry, D. W., & Land, S. M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37(2), 145-153.
50. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60.
51. Travis, J. E. (1997). Models for improving college teaching: A faculty resource. ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
52. Wallin, D. L. (2003). Motivation and faculty development: A three-state study of presidential perceptions of faculty professional development needs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 317-335.
53. Wang, C. Y. (2001). Walk a mile in students' shoes: An approach to faculty development on integrating web-based collaborative learning into instruction. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/155.html
54. Wilson, W. (2003). Faculty perceptions and uses of instructional technology: A study at one university system revealed the current state of technology and some steps that could improve it. Educause Quarterly, 2, 60-62.