Strategies for Motivating Higher Education Faculty to Use Technology

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 145-153

  Surry, Daniel W ^a   Land, Susan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034410114     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13558000050034501     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Brace, S B and Roberts, G (1996) Supporting faculty's development and use of instructional technology. In Office of Information Technology (ed.) Proceedings of the 1996 Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, pp. 303-18.
2. Chandler, D (1995) Technological or media determinism. Available online: http://www.aber.ac.uk/~dgc/tdet01.html
3. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992) The Jasper experiment: an exploration of issues in learning and instructional design, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 1, 65-80.
4. DeLoughry, T J (1994) Pushing the envelope, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct 19, A37-A38.
5. Dennis, A, George, J, Jessup, L, Nunamaker, J F, and Vogel, D (1988) Information technology to support electronic meetings, MIS Quarterly, 12, 4, 591-624.
6. Ehrmann, S C (1995) Asking the right questions: what does research tell us about technology and higher learning?, Change, 27, 2, 20-7.
7. Elfin, M and Wright, A R (1994) America's best colleges, US News & World Report, 117, 12, 86-8.
8. Ely, D P (1996) Trends in Educational Technology 1995, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse, NY.
9. Farquhar, J D and Surry, D W (1994) Adoption analysis: an additional tool for instructional developers, Education and Training Technology International, 31, 1, 19-25.
10. Geoghegan, W H (1994) What Ever Happened to Instructional Technology? Paper Presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Business Schools Computing Association, July, Baltimore, MD.
11. Gilbert, S W (1996) Making the most of a slow revolution, Change, 28, 2, 10-23.
12. Green, K C (1996) The coming ubiquity of information technology, Change, 28, 2, 24-9.
13. Green, K C and Gilbert, S W (1995) Great expectations: content, communications, productivity and the role of information technology in higher education, Change, 27, 2, 8-12.
14. Guzdial, M (1997) Technological support for an apprenticeship in object-oriented design and programming, in Proceedings of the OOPSLA '97 Educators Symposium, Atlanta, GA, ACM. Available online: http://guzdial.cc.gatech.edu/papers/oopsla97ed/
15. Hannafin, M J, Hall, C, Land, S and Hill, J (1994) Learning in open-ended environments: assumptions, methods, and implications, Educational Technology, 34, 8, 48-55.
16. Hannafin, M J and Land, S M (1997) The foundations and assumptions of student-centred learning environments, Instructional Science, 25, 3, 167-202.
17. Harasim, L, Hiltz, T and Turoff, M (1995) Learning Networks: A Guide to Teaching and Learning On-line, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Hooper, S and Rieber, L (1998) Teaching with technology. In Ornstein, A (ed.) Teaching: Theory into Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights.
19. Keller, J M (1983) Motivational design of instruction. In Reigeluth, C (ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Lebow, D, Wager, W, Marks, P and Gilbert, N (1996) Construe: Software for Collaborative Learning over the World Wide Web, paper presented at the AECT Collaboration in Distance Education Conference, Tallahassee, FL.
21. Nicaise, M and Barnes, D (1996) The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher education, Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 3, 205-12.
22. Pea, R D (1993) Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon's, G (ed.) Distributed Intelligence, Cambridge, New York.
23. Perkins, D N (1985) The fingertip effect: how information-processing technology shapes thinking, Educational Researcher, 14, 7, 11-17.
24. Perkins, D and Simmons, R (1988) Patterns of misunderstanding: an integrative model for science, math, and programming, Review of Educational Research, 58, 3, 303-26.
25. Rogers, E M (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn., The Free Press, New York.
26. Salomon, G (1986) Information technologies: what you see is not (always) what you get, Educational Psychologist, 20, 207-16.
27. Savery, J R and Duffy, T M (1996) Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. In Wilson, B G (ed.) Constructivist Learning Environments: Case studies in instructional design, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
28. Scardamalia, M, Bereiter C, McLean, R, Swallow, J and Woodruff, E (1989) Computer-supported intentional learning environments, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1, 51-68.
29. Tessmer, M (1990) Environmental analysis: a neglected stage of instructional design, Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 55-64.