Technology’s impact on faculty life and work

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 1998, Issue 76, 1998, Pages 7-21

  Baldwin, Roger G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944795250     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.7601     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Austin, A. E., and Baldwin, R. G. Faculty Collaboration: Enhancing the Quality of Scholarship and Teaching. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 7. Washington, D.C.: Graduate School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, 1991.
2. Batson, T., and Bass, R. “Teaching and Learning in the Computer Age: Primacy of Process.” Change, 1996, 28 (2), 42–47.
3. Bowers, C. A. “The Paradox of Technology: What’s Gained and Lost?” Thought and Action, 1998, 14 (1), 49–57.
4. Boyer, E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
5. Bromley, H. “How to Tell If You Really Need the Latest Technology.” Thought and Action, 1998, 14 (1), 21–28.
6. DeSieno, R. “Netlaw: The Faculty and Digital Technology.” Educom Review, 1995, 30 (4), 46–48.
7. Finn, C. E. “Today’s Academic Market Requires a New Taxonomy of Colleges.” Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan. 9, 1998, p. B4.
8. Gappa, J. M., and Leslie, D. W. The Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
9. Gilbert, S. W. “Making the Most of a Slow Revolution.” Change, 1996, 28 (2), 10–23.
10. Green, K. C. “The Coming Ubiquity of Information Technology.” Change, 1996, 28 (2), 24–28.
11. Green, K. C. “The 1997 National Survey of Information Technology in Higher Education.” [http://ericir.syr.edu/Projects/Campus_computing/1997/index.html]. 1997.
12. Guernsey, L. “Those Who Publish On Line Fear They Suffer in Tenure Reviews.” Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6, 1997, p. A21.
13. Guernsey, L. “Historians Form New Organization on Technology in Teaching and Research.” Chronicle of Higher Education, May 8, 1998, p. A30.
14. Kirshstein, R., Matheson, N., and Jing, Z. Instructional Faculty and Staffin Higher Education Institutions: Fall 1987 and Fall 1992, NCES 97–447. 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, NSOPF-93. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 1997.
15. Lynton, E., and Elman, S. New, Priorities for the University: Meeting Society’s Needs for Applied Knowledge and Competent Individuals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
16. Neal, E. “Using Technology in Teaching: We Need to Exercise Healthy Skepticism.” Chronicle of Higher Education, June 19, 1998, pp. B4–B5.
17. “An‘Online’ Experience.” Change, 1995, 27 (2), 28–45.
18. Plater, W. M. “Future Work: Faculty Time in the 21st Century.” Change, 1995, 27 (3), 22–33.
19. Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. (4th ed.) New York: Free Press, 1995.
20. Saltrick, S. “A Campus of Our Own: Thoughts of a Reluctant Conservative.” Change, 1996, 28 (2), 58–62.
21. Simpson, R. “The Overwhelming Nature of Higher Education.” Innovative Higher Education, 1998, 22 (4), 267–269.
22. Van Dusen, G. C. The Virtual Campus: Technology and Reform in Higher Education. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report no. 1. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University, 1997.
23. Van Dusen, G. C. “Technology: Higher Education’s Magic Bullet.” Thought and Action, 1998, 14 (1), 59–67.
24. Young, J. R. “Rethinking the Role of the Professor in an Age of High-Tech Tools.” Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 3, 1997, p. A26.
25. Young, J. R. “Skeptical Academics See Perils in Information Technology.” Chronicle of Higher Education, May 8, 1998, p. A29.