An evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography use in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada

Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 98-106

  Smith, Bradley R ^a   Park, Jae Hyun ^a,b   Cederberg, Robert A ^c  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); Orthodontic education; Orthodontic residents; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDER; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH MALFORMATION; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CANADA; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; EDUCATION, DENTAL, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS; TOOTH, IMPACTED; TOOTH, SUPERNUMERARY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79251602664     PISSN: 00220337     EISSN: 19307837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;42(6):463-75.
2. Closmann JJ, Schmidt BL. The use of cone beam computed tomography as an aid in evaluating and treatment planning for mandibular cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(4):766-71.
3. Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52(4):825-41.
4. Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4):434-7.
5. Liu D, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Ma X. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(1):91-8.
6. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, Huang JC. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(5):590-7.
7. Terajima M, Nakasima A, Aoki Y, Goto TK, Tokumori K, Mori N, Hoshinod Y. A 3-dimensional method for analyzing the morphology of patients with maxillofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(6):857-67.
8. Oberoi S, Chigurupati R, Gill P, Hoffman WY, Vargervik K. Volumetric assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009;46(5):503-11.
9. Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, Klueber K, Silveira AM, Haskell BS, Farman AG. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(4):429-38.
10. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(6):803-11.
11. Kim Y, Hong J, Hwang Y, Park Y. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(3):306.e1-11.
12. Carvalho FDAR, Cevidanes LHS, da Motta ATS, Almeida MADO, Phillips C. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular advancement 1 year after surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(Suppl 4):S53.e1-12.
13. Berco M, Rigali PH, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(1):17.e1-9.
14. Moshiri M, Scarfe WC, Hilgers ML, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(4):550-60.
15. Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(2):156.e1-6.
16. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38(5):262-73.
17. Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(2):256-65.
18. van Vlijmen O, Bergé S, Swennen G, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(1):92-7.
19. Ludlow JB, Gubler M, Cevidanes L, Mol A. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(3):312.e1-10.
20. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater JJR, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(1):16.e1-6.
21. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134(4):573-82.
22. Hujoel P, Hollender L, Bollen A, Young JD, McGee M, Grosso A. Head-and-neck organ doses from an episode of orthodontic care. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(2):210-7.
23. Silva M, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133(5):640.e1-5.
24. Noble J, Hechter FJ, Karaiskos NE, Lekic N, Wiltshire WA. Future practice plans of orthodontic residents in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(3):357-60.
25. Aboudara C, Nielsen I, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher D. Comparison of airway space with conventional lateral headfilms and 3-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135(4):468-79.
26. Grauer D, Cevidanes LSH, Styner MA, Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Pharyngeal airway volume and shape from cone-beam computed tomography: relationship to facial morphology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(6):805-14.
27. Zhao Y, Nguyen M, Gohl E, Mah JK, Sameshima G, Enciso R. Oropharyngeal airway changes after rapid palatal expansion evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(Suppl 4):S71-8.
28. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(6):764.e1-11.
29. Leuzinger M, Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Kiliaridis S. Root-contact evaluation by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(3):389-92.
30. Park J, Cho HJ. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136(3):314.e1-12.
31. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(Suppl 4):S68-73.
32. Wilmes B, Su Y, Drescher D. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2008;78(6):1065-70.
33. Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD, Powers J, Bussa HI, Salas-Lopez AM, Corbett JA. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80(4):474-81.
34. White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(4):456.e1-9.
35. Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75(3):300-4.
36. Quimby ML, Vig KWL, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74(3):298-303.
37. Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index. Angle Orthod 2010;80(3):435-9.
38. Hechler SL. Cone-beam CT: applications in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52(4):809-23.
39. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38(6):609-25.
40. Jerrold L. Litigation, legislation, and ethics: liability regarding computerized axial tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132(1):122-4.
41. Turpin DL. Befriend your oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(6):697.
42. Isaacson K, Thom A, Horner K, Whaites E. Orthodontic radiographs: guidelines for the use of radiographs in clinical orthodontics. 3rd ed. London: British Orthodontic Society, 2008.
43. Turpin DL. British Orthodontic Society revises guidelines for clinical radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134(5):597-8.
44. American Association of Orthodontists. eBulletin 05-06-10: House of Delegates acts on resolutions. At: www.aaomembers.org/Resources/Publications/ eBulletin-05-06-10.cfm. Accessed: June 9, 2010.
45. American Association of Orthodontists. AAO imaging initiative: AAO and AAOMR to produce joint position paper on imaging. At: www.aaomembers.org/ MyPractice/Technology/AAO-Imaging-Initiative.cfm. Accessed: June 9, 2010.
46. Turpin DL. Clinical guidelines and the use of cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138(1):1-2.
47. Kokich VG. Cone-beam computed tomography: have we identified the orthodontic benefits? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(Suppl 4):S16.