Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 662-669

  Torassian, Gilda ^a   Kau, Chung How ^b   English, Jeryl D ^a   Powers, John ^a   Bussa, Harry I ^a   Salas Lopez, Anna Marie ^a   Corbett, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital models; Impression materials

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953176608     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/072409-413.1     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Han UK, Vig KW, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 100:212-219.
2. Joffe L. Current products and practices OrthoCADTM: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod. 2004;31:344-347.
3. Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:431-434.
4. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:298-303.
5. Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod. 2003;30:219-223.
6. Tennison J, English JD, Bussa H, Powers J, Frey G, Duke J. Dimensional Stability of Orthodontic Alginates [master's thesis]. Houston, Tex: University of Texas Dental Branch; 2007.
7. Shambarger JH, English JD, Darsey D, Powers JM, Frey GN, Lee RP, Bussa HI. The accuracy of OrthoCAD digital models compared to plaster models. Presented at: International Association for Dental Research Annual Meeting; April 3, 2008; Dallas, Tex. Poster #0382.