Quantitative structure-activity relationship of compounds binding to estrogen receptor β based on heuristic method

Science China Chemistry

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 237-243

  Zhang, Yiming ^a   Yang, Xushu ^a   Sun, Cheng ^b   Wang, Liansheng ^b  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

applicability domain; estrogen receptor (ER ); heuristic method; quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR)

Indexed keywords

APPLICABILITY DOMAIN; BEST MODEL; BINDING MODES; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSIONS; PREDICTIVE POWER; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE; WILLIAMS;

BINDING ENERGY; HEALTH RISKS; LINEAR REGRESSION;

HEURISTIC METHODS;

EID: 79251595066     PISSN: 16747291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-010-4077-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. R.J. Kavlock G.P. Daston C. Derosa P. Fenner-Crisp L.E. Gray S. Kaattari G. Lucier M. Luster M.J. Mac C. Maczka R. Miller J. Moore R. Rolland G. Scott D.M. Sheehan T. Sinks H.A. Tilson 1996 Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: A report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop Environ Health Perspect 104 suppl4 715 740 10.2307/3432708
2. P. Diel 2002 Tissue-specific estrogenic response and molecular mechanisms Toxicol Lett 127 217 224 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjtFKjurY%3D 10.1016/S0378-4274(01) 00503-3
3. A.K. Shiau D. Barstad P.M. Loria L. Cheng P.J. Kushner D.A. Agard G.L. Greene 1998 The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator rec ognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen Cell 95 927 937 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjslyltQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81717-1
4. L.M. Shi H. Fang W. Tong J. Wu R. Perkins R. Blair W. Branham D. Sheehan 2001 QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41 186 195 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXoslKjtbg%3D
5. H. Liu E. Papa P. Gramatica 2006 QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles Chem Res Toxicol 19 1540 1548 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVahu7fL 10.1021/tx0601509
6. F. Marini A. Roncaglioni M. Novic 2005 Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders J Chem Inf Model 45 1507 1519 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFaltbrN 10.1021/ci0501645
7. X.S. Yang X.D. Wang L. Ji R. Li C. Sun L.S. Wang 2008 Combining docking and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (COMSIA) to predict estrogen activity and probe molecular mechanisms of estrogen activity for estrogen compounds Chin Sci Bull 53 23 3626 3633 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVymtL7P 10.1007/s11434-008-0480-5
8. L. Ji X.D. Wang X.S. Yang S.S. Liu L.S. Wang 2008 Back-propagation network improved by conjugate gradient based on genetic algorithm in QSAR study on endocrine disrupting chemicals Chin Sci Bull 53 1 33 39 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1cXlt1KhtQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s11434-007-0484-6
9. A. Asikainen J. Ruuskanen K. Tuppurainen 2004 Consensus kNN QSAR: A versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large diverse set of ligands Environ Sci Technol 38 6724 6729 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXptF2lsrw%3D 10.1021/es049665h
10. W. Tong P. Perkins 1997 QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor α and β subtypes Endocrinology 138 9 4022 4025 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlsFeisbs%3D 10.1210/en.138.9.4022
11. L. Xing W.J. Welsh W. Tong R. Perkins D.M. Sheehan 1999 Comparison of estrogen receptor α and β subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) SAR QSAR Environ Res 10 215 237 1:CAS:528: DyaK1MXlvFCgsbo%3D 10.1080/10629369908039177
12. X.S. Yang X.D. Wang S. Luo L. Ji L. Qin R. Li C. Sun L.S. Wang 2009 3D-QSAR and docking studies of estrogen compounds based on estrogen receptor β Sci China Ser B-Chem 52 7 1042 1050 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnslSqsrc%3D 10.1007/s11426-009-0068-1
13. F. Li J. Chen Z. Wang J. Li X. Qiao 2009 Determination and prediction of xenoestrogens by recombinant yeast-based assay and QSAR Chemosphere 74 1152 1157 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXitVygsLs%3D 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.081
14. L. Kurunczi E. Seclaman T.I. Oprea L. Crisan Z. Simon 2005 MTD-PLS: A PLS variant of the minimal topologic difference method. III. Mapping interactions between estradiol derivatives and the alpha estrogenic receptor J Chem Inf Model 45 1275 1281 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmsFCqtbY%3D 10.1021/ci050077c
15. G.G.J.M. Kuiper B. Carlsson K. Grandien E. Enmark J. Häggblad S. Nilsson J. Gustafsson 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors α and β Endocrinology 138 3 863 870 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXht1OksrY%3D 10.1210/en.138.3.863
16. G.G.J.M. Kuiper J.G. Lemmen B. Carlsson J.C. Corton S.H. Safe P.T. van der Saag B. van der Burg J. Gustafsson 1998 Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor β Endocrinology 139 10 4252 4263 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXmsVGmsrw%3D 10.1210/en.139.10.4252
17. H. Fang W. Tong R. Perkins A.M. Soto N.V. Prechtl D.M. Sheehan 2000 Quantitative comparison of in vitro assays for estrogenic activity Environ Health Perspect 108 723 729 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXntVCisbY%3D
18. Todeschini R, Consonni V, Mauri A, Milano PM. DRAGON, Version 2.1 for Windows, Software for the calculation of molecular descriptors. 2002, Talete srl, Milan, Italy
19. A.R. Katritzky D.C. Fara H.F. Yang M. Karelson T. Suzuki V.P. Solov'ev 2004 Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of β-cyclodextrin complexation free energies J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44 529 541 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXnsVKisQ%3D%3D
20. S.S. Liu H.L. Liu C.S. Yin L.S. Wang 2003 VSMP: A novel variable selection and modeling method based on the prediction J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43 964 969 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXis1ert74%3D
21. A. Tropsha P. Gramatica V.K. Gombar 2003 The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models QSAR Comb Sci 22 69 76 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXkslOqsrw%3D 10.1002/qsar.200390007
22. A. Golbraikh A. Tropsha 2002 Beware of q2! J Mol Graph Model 20 269 276 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXpt1art7o%3D 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00123-1
23. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Germany: Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000
24. J. Gasteiger J. Sadowski J. Schuur 1996 Chemical information in 3D space J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36 1030 1037 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XltlCms7k%3D