Variable selection and interpretation in structure - Affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1507-1519

  Marini, Federico ^a,b   Roncaglioni, Alessandra ^a,c   Novič, Marjana ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovenia)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; NEURAL NETWORKS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTY; COUNTERPROPAGATION; RECEPTORS; REGRESSION MODEL;

HORMONES;

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETIC DATABASE; METABOLISM; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DATABASES, GENETIC; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 28944454142     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0501645     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. ICPS-WHO. International Programme on Chemical Safety, Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disrupters; Damstra, T., Barlow, S., Bergman, A., Kavlock, R., Van Der Kraak, G., Eds.; 2000.
2. Hong, H. X.; Tong, W. D.; Fang, H.; Shi, L. M.; Xie, Q.; Wu, J.; Perkins, R.; Walker, J. D.; Branham, W.; Sheehan, D. M. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 29-36.
3. Schultz, T. W.; Sinks, G. D.; Cronin, M. T. D. Structure-activity relationships for gene activation oestrogenicity: Evaluation of a diverse set of aromatic chemicals. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17, 14-23.
4. de Voogt, P.; van Hattum, B. Critical factors in exposure modelling of endocrine active substances. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 1933-1948.
5. Tong, W. D.; Fang, H.; Hong, H. X.; Xie, Q.; Perkins, R.; Anson, J.; Sheehan, D. M. Regulatory application of SAR/QSAR for priority setting of endocrine disrupters: A perspective. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 2375-2388.
6. Fukushima, S.; Freyberger, A. Simple, rapid assays for conventional definite testing of endocrine disrupter hazard: Summary and recommendations. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 2479-2482.
7. Blair, R. M.; Fang, H.; Branham, W. S.; Hass, B. S.; Dial, S. L.; Moland, C. L.; Tong, W.; Shi, L.; Perkins, R.; Sheehan, D. M. The Estrogen Receptor Relative Binding Affinities of 188 Natural and Xenochemicals: Structural Diversity of Ligands. Toxicol. Sci. 2000, 54, 138-153.
8. Martens, H.; Martens, M. Multivariate Analysis of Quality. An Introduction; J. Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 2000.
9. Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B. R. Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 185, 1-17.
10. Eriksson, L.; Johansson, E.; Kettaneh-Wold, N.; Wold, S. Introduction to Multi and Megavariate Data Analysis using Projection Methods (PCA & PLS); Umetrics AB: Umeå, Sweden, 1999.
11. Dayhof, J. Neural Network Architectures, An Introduction; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1990; p 192.
12. Zupan, J.; Novič, M.; Ruisanchez, I.; Kohonen and counter-propagation artificial neural networks in analytical chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38, 1-23.
13. Rumelhart, D. E.; Hinton, G. E.; Williams, R. J. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Microstructures of Cognition, I; Rumalhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, 1986; pp 318-362.
14. Todeschini, R. Consonni, V. The Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Series of Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry - Vol. 11; Mannhold, R., Kubinyi, H., Timmerman, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000.
15. Katritzky, A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Copyright 1994-1996, CODESSA 2.0, Comprehensive Descriptors for Structural and Statistical Analysis; University of Florida, U.S.A.
16. Dragon, Copyright 1997-2004 TALETE srl - Milano, Italy; Developed by Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Mauri, A.; Pavan, M. Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Environmental Sciences - University of Milano.
17. Sadowski, J.; Gasteiger, J.; Klebe, G. Comparison of Automatic 3-Dimensional Model Builders Using 639 X-Ray Structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1000-1008.
18. Davis, L. Handbook of Genetic Algorithms; New York, 1991.
19. Hibbert, B. Genetic Algorithm in Chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1993, 19, 277-293.
20. Zupan, J.; Novič, M. Optimisation of structure representation for QSAR studies. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 388, 243-250.
21. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. The Development and Use of Quantum-Mechanical Molecular-Models. 76. Am1 - A New General-Purpose Quantum-Mechanical Molecular-Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909.
22. Hansch, L.; Leo, A. Exploring QSAR Fundamentals and Applications in Chemistry and Biology; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995.
23. Osborne, C. Statistical Calibration - A Review. Int. Stat. Rev. 1991, 59, 309-336.
24. Novič, M.; Zupan, J. Investigation of Infrared Spectra-Structure Correlation Using Kohonen and Counter-Propagation Neural Network. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 454-466.
25. Roncaglioni, A.; Novič, M.; Vračko, M.; Benfenati, E. Classification of potential endocrine disrupters on the basis of molecular structure using a nonlinear modelling method. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 300-309.
26. Martens, H. A.; Dardenne, P. Validation and verification of regression of small data sets. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998, 44, 99-121.
27. Gao, H.; Lajiness, M. S.; Van Drie, J. Enhancement of binary QSAR analysis by a GA-based variable selection method. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 259-268.
28. Shi, L. M.; Fang, H.; Tong, W.; Wu, J.; Perkins, R.; Blair, R. M.; Branham, W. S.; Dial, S. L.; Moland, C. L.; Sheehan, D. M. QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of Estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 47, 186-195.
29. Asikainen, A.; Ruuskanen, J.; Tuppurainen, K. Consensus kNN QSAR: a versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6724-6729.
30. Ghafourian, T.; Cronin, M. T. D. The impact of variable selection on the modelling of oestrogenicity. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2005, 16, 171-190.
31. Klopman, G.; Chakravarti, K. S. Structure-activity relationship study of a diverse set of estrogen receptor ligands (I) using MultiCASE expert system. Chemosphere 2003, 57, 445-459.
32. Waller, C. L. A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR, and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 758-765.
33. Wolohan, P.; Reichert, D. E. CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands. J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 313-328.
34. Pasha, F. A.; Srivastava, H. K.; Singh, P. P. QSAR study of estrogens with the help of PM3-based descriptors. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2005, 104, 87-100.