VSMP: A novel variable selection and modeling method based on the prediction

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 964-969

  Liu, Shu Shen ^a,b   Liu, Hai Ling ^b   Yin, Chun Sheng ^a   Wang, Lian Sheng ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUILIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TOPOLOGY;

QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP (QSAR);

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 0038512063     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci020377j     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yasri, A.; Hartsough, D. Toward an optimal procedure for variable selection and QSAR model building. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1218-1227.
2. Waller, C. L.; Bradley, M. P. Development and validation of a novel variable selection technique with application to multidimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 345-355.
3. Steyerberg, E. W.; Eijkemans, M. J. C.; Habbema, J. D. F. Stepwise selection in small data sets: A simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1999, 52(10), 935-942.
4. Agostinelli, C. Robust stepwise regression. J. Appl. Stat. 2002, 29(6), 825-840.
5. Westfall, P. H.; Young, S. S.; Lin, D. K. J. Forward selection error control in the analysis of supersaturated design. Stat. Sinica 1998, 8, 101-117.
6. Hoskuldsson, Agnar. Variable and subset selection in PLS regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 55, 23-38
7. Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B. R. Partial least-sqaures regression: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 185, 1-17.
8. Norinder, U.; Rivera, C.; Unden, A. A quantitative structure-activity relationship study of some substance P-related peptides. A multivariate approach using PLS and variable selection. J. Pept. Res. 1997, 49(2), 155-162.
9. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
10. Robinson, D. D.; Winn, P. J.; Lyne, P. D.; Richards, W. G. Self-Organizing Molecular Field Analysis: A Tool for Structure-Activity Studies. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 573-583.
11. Tong, W.; Lowis, D. R.; Perkins, R.; Chen, Y.; Welsh, W. J.; Goddette, D. W.; Heritage, T. W.; Sheehan, D. M. Evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship methods for large-scale prediction of chemicals binding to the estrogen receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 669-677.
12. Kubinyi, H. Variable selection in QSAR studies, 1. An evolutionary algorithm. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 285-294.
13. Wikel, J.; Dow, E. The use of neural networks for variable selection in QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 645-651.
14. Kovalishyn, V. V.; Tetko, I. V.; Luik, A. I.; Kholodovych, V. V.; Villa, A. E. P.; Livingstone, D. J. Neural network studies. 3. Variable selection in the cascade-correlation learning architecture. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38(4), 651-659.
15. Ramadan, Z.; Song, X. H.; Hopke, P. K.; Johnson, M. J.; Scow, K. M. Variable selection in classification of environmental soil samples for partial least-squares and neural network models. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446(1-2), 233-244.
16. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning; Addison-Wesley: New York, 1989.
17. Hasegawa, K.; Kimura, T.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: Application of GA-based region selection to a 3D-QSAR study of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39(1), 112-120.
18. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure- activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 4, 854-866.
19. Leardi, R.; Boggia, R.; Terrile, M. Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. J. Chemom. 1992, 6, 267-281.
20. Abraham, B.; Chipman, H.; Vijayan, K. Some risks in the construction and analysis of supersaturated design. Technometrics 1999, 41, 135-141.
21. Smith, J. S.; Macina, O. T.; Sussman, N. B.; Luster, M. I.; Karol, M. H. A robust structure-activity relationship (SAR) model for esters that cause skin irritation in humans. Toxicol. Sci. 2000, 55(1), 215-222.
22. Liu, S. P.; Lu, J. C.; Kolpin, D. W.; Meeker, W. Q. Analysis of environmental data with censored observations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31(12), 3358-3362.
23. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Beware of q 2. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269-276.
24. Liu, S. S.; Yin, C. S.; Wang, L. S. Combined MEDV-GA-MLR Method for QSAR of Three Panels of Steroids, Dipeptides, and COX-2 Inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42(3), 749-756.
25. Selwood, D. L.; Livingstone, D. J.; Comley, J. C. W.; O'Dowd, A. B.; Hudson, A. T.; Jackson, P.; Jandu, K. S.; Rose, V. S.; Stables, J. N. Structure-activity relationships of antifilarial antimycin analogues: a multivariate pattern recognition study. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 33, 136-142.