QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles

Chemical Research in Toxicology

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1540-1548

  Liu, Huanxiang ^a   Papa, Ester ^a   Gramatica, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; ECOTOXICITY; ESTROGEN ACTIVITY; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RECEPTOR BINDING; RELIABILITY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOXICOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; CHLORDECONE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTROGENS; HUMANS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RUTIN;

EID: 33845277149     PISSN: 0893228X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/tx0601509     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kavlock, R. J., Daston, G. P., DeRosa, C., Fenner-Crisp, P., Gray, L. E., Kaattari, S., Lucier, G., Luster, M., Mac, M. J., Maczka, C., Miller, R., Moore, J., Rolland, R., Scott, G., Sheehan, D. M., Sinks, T., and Tilson, H. A. (1996) Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 104, 715-740.
2. Colborn, T. (1995) Environmental estrogens: health implications for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 135-136.
3. Saliner, A. G., Amat, L., Carbó-Dorca, R., Schultz, T. W., and Cronin, M. T. D. (2003) Molecular quantum similarity analysis of estrogenic activity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 1166-1176.
4. Hong, H., Tong, W., Fang, H., Shi, L., Xie Q., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Walker, J. D., Branham, W., and Sheehan, D. M. (2002) Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 29-36.
5. Tong, W., Fang, H., Hong, H., Xie, Q., Perkins, R., Anson, J., and Sheehan, D. M. (2003) Workshop 1.2. Regulatory application of SAR/QSAR for priority setting of endocrine disruptors: A perspective. Pure Appl. Chem. 75, 2375-2388.
6. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/chemicals/reach.htm.
7. Cramer, R. D. III, Patterson, D. E., and Bunce, J. D. (1988) Comparative molecular-field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 5959-5967.
8. Gantchev, T. G., Ali, H., and van Lier, J. E. (1994) Quantitative structure-activity relationships/comparative molecular field analysis (QSAR/CoMFA) for receptor-binding properties of halogenated estradiol derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 37, 4164-4176.
9. Waller, C. L., Oprea, T. I., Chae, K., Park, H.-K., Korach, K. S., Laws, S. C., Wiese, T. E., Kelce, W. R., and Gray, L. E. Jr. (1996) Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9, 1240-1248.
10. Shi, L., Fang, H., Tong, W., Wu, J., Perkins, R., Blair, R. M., Branham, W. S., Dial, S. L., Moland, C. L., and Sheehan, D. M. (2001) QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 186-195.
11. Colemana, K. P., Toscano, W. A., and Wiese, T. E. (2003) QSAR Models of the in vitro estrogen activity of bisphenol A analogs. QSAR Comb. Sci. 22, 78-88.
12. Asikainen, A., Ruuskanen, J., and Tuppurainen, K. (2003) Spectroscopic QSAR methods and self-organizing molecular field analysis for relating molecular structure and estrogenic activity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 1974-1981.
13. Zheng, W., and Tropsha, A. (2000) Novel variable selection quantitative structure-property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbour principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40, 185-194.
14. Asikainen, A., Ruuskanen, J., and Tuppurainen, K. (2004) Consensus kNN QSAR: A versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 6724-6729.
15. Bradbury, S., Kamenska, V., Schmieder, P., Ankley, G., and Mekenyan, O. (2000) A computationally based identification algorithm for estrogen receptor ligands: Part 1. Predicting hERα binding affinity. Toxicol. Sci. 58, 253-269.
16. Mekenyan, O., Kamenska, V., Serafimova, R., Poellinger, L., Brouwer, A., and Walker, J. (2002) Development and validation of an average mammalian estrogen receptor-based QSAR model. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13, 579-595.
17. Kurunczi, L., Seclaman, E., Oprea, T. I., Crisan, L., and Simon, Z. (2005) MTD-PLS: A PLS variant of the minimal topologic difference method. III. Mapping interactions between estradiol derivatives and the alpha estrogenic receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Model 45, 1275-1281.
18. Marini, F., Roncaglioni, A., and Novič, M. (2005) Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45, 1507-1519.
19. Lill, M. A., Vedani, A., and Dobler, M. (2004) Raptor: Combining dual-shell representation, induced-fit simulation, and hydrophobicity scoring in receptor modeling: Application toward the simulation of structurally diverse ligand sets. J. Med. Chem. 47, 6174-6186.
20. http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,2340, en_2649_201185_33957015-_1_1_1_1, 00.html.
21. Tropsha, A., Gramatica, P., and Gombar, V. K. (2003) The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 22, 69-76.
22. Eriksson, L., Jaworska J., Worth, A. P., Cronin, M. T. D., McDowell, R. M., and Gramatica, P. (2003) Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1361-1375.
23. Baumann, K. (2003) Cross-validation as the objective function for variable-selection techniques. Trends Anal. Chem. 22, 395-406.
24. Kuiper, G. G., Lemmen, J. G., Carlsson, B., Corton, J. C., Safe, S. H., van der Saag, P. T., van der Burg, B., and Gustafsson, J. A. (1998) Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 139, 4252-4263.
25. HyperChem. (2002) Release 7.03 for Windows. Molecular Modeling System. Hypercube, Inc., Gainesville, FL.
26. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., Mauri, A., and Pavan, M. (2005) DRAGON, Version 5.3 for Windows. Software for the Calculation of Molecular Descriptors. Talete srl, Milan, Italy.
27. Katritzky, A. R., Lobanov, V. S., and Karelson, M. (1994) CODESSA, Version 5.3, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
28. Todeschini, R., and Gramatica, P. (1997) The WHIM theory: New 3D molecular descriptors for QSAR in environmental modelling. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 7, 89-115.
29. Consonni, V., Todeschini, R., and Pavan, M. (2002) Structure/response correlation and similarity/diversity analysis by GETAWAY descriptors. Part 1. Theory of the novel 3D molecular descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 693-705.
30. Todeschini, R., and Consonni, V. (2000) Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
31. Yasri, A., and Hartsough, D. (2001) Toward an optimal procedure for variable selection and QSAR model building. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1218-1227.
32. Hou, T. J., Wang, J. M., Liao, N., and Xu, X. J. (1999) Application of genetic algorithms on the structure-activity relationship analysis of some cinnamaides. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 775-781.
33. Hasegawa, K. (1999) GA Strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: Application of GA-based region selection to a 3D-QSAR study of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39, 112-120.
34. Leardi, R., Boggia, R., and Terrile, M. (1992) Genetic algorithms as a strategy for feature selection. J. Chemom. 6, 267-281.
35. Rogers, D., and Hopfinger, A. J. (1994) Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34, 854-866.
36. Papa, E., Villa, F., and Gramatica, P. (2005) Statistically validated QSARs and theoretical descriptors for the modelling of the aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45, 1256-1266.
37. Gramatica, P., Pilutti, P., and Papa, E. (2004) Validated QSAR prediction of OH tropospheric degradation of VOCs: Splitting into training-test sets and consensus modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 1794-1802.
38. Gramatica, P., Giani E., and Papa, E. (2006) Statistical external validation and consensus modeling: a QSPR case study for Koc prediction. J. Mol. Graph. Modell., in press.
39. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., and Pavan, M. (2002) MOBY DIGS, Version 1.2 for Windows, Software for Multilinear Regression Analysis and Variable Subset Selection by Genetic Algorithm, Talete srl, Milan, Italy.
40. Todeschini, R., Maiocchi, A., and Consonni, V. (1999) The K Correlation Index: Theory Development and its Application in Chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 46, 13-29.
41. Eriksson, L., Jaworska, J., Worth, A., Cronin, M., McDowell, R. M., and Gramatica, P. (2003) Methods for reliability, uncertainty assessment, and applicability evaluations of regression based and classification QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1361-1375.
42. Marengo, E., and Todeschini, R. (1992) A new algorithm for optimal distance-based experimental design. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 16, 37-44.
43. Sjostrom, M., and Eriksson, L. (1995) Applications of Statistical Experimental Design, in Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design (Van de Warerbeemd H., Ed.) Vol. 2, pp 63-90, VCH, New York.
44. Zupan, J., Novic, M., and Ruisánchez, I. (1997) Kohonen and counter propagation artificial neural networks in analytical chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 38, 1-23.
45. Todeschini, R., and Mauri, A. (2002) DOLPHIN, Ver. 2.0 for Windows, Software for Optimal Distancebased Experimental Design, Talete srl, Milan, Italy.
46. Todeschini, R., and Consonni, V. (2001) KOALA, Rel. 1.0 for Windows, Software for Kohonen Artificial Neural Networks, Talete srl, Milan, Italy.
47. 2! J. Mol. Graph. Modell. 20, 269-276.
48. Cash, G. G., Anderson, B., Mayo, K., Bogaczyk, S., and Tunkel, J. (2005) Predicting genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using eelctrotopological state indices. Mutat. Res. 585, 170-183.
49. Oberg, T. (2004) A QSAR for baseline toxicity: Validation, domain of application and prediction. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17, 1630-1637.
50. Korhonen, S.-P., Tuppurainen, K., Laatikainen, R., and Peräkylä, M. (2005) Comparing the performance of FLUFF-BALL to SEAL-CoMFA with a large diverse estrogen data set: from relevant superpositions to solid predictions. J. Chem. Inf. Model 45, 1874-1883.
51. Estrada, E. (1995) Edge adjacency relationships and a novel topological index related to molecular volume. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 31-33.
52. Estrada, E. (1995) Edge adjacency relationships in molecular graphs containing heteroatoms: a new topological index related to molar volume. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 701-707.