Back-propagation network improved by conjugate gradient based on genetic algorithm in QSAR study on endocrine disrupting chemicals

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-39

  Ji, Li ^a   Wang, Xiaodong ^a   Yang, Xushu ^a   Liu, Shushen ^b   Wang, Liansheng ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Ministry of Education ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Back propagation; Conjugate gradient; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Genetic algorithm; Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs)

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149044166     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-007-0484-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cooper R L, Kavlock R J. Endocrine disruptors and reproductive development: A weight-of-evidence overview. J Endocrinol, 1997, 152(2): 159-166
2. Gray L E. Tiered screening and testing strategy for xenoestrogens and antiandrogens. Toxicol Lett, 1998, 102-103: 677-680
3. Waller C L, Oprea T I, Chae K, et al. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem Res Toxicol, 1996, 9(8): 1240-1248
4. Tong W, Perkins R, Xing L, et al. QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes. Endocrinology, 1997, 138(9): 4022-4025
5. Shi L M, Fang H, Tong W, et al. QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2001, 41(1): 186-195
6. Yu S J, Keenan S M, Tong W, et al. Influence of the structural diversity of data sets on the statistical quality of 3D-QSAR models: Predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens. Chem Res Toxicol, 2002, 15(10): 1229-1234
7. Colemana K P, Toscano W A, Wiese T E. QSAR models of the in vitro estrogen activity of bisphenol A analogs. QSAR Comb Sci, 2003, 22: 78-88
8. Asikainen A, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen K. Spectroscopic QSAR methods and self-organizing molecular field analysis for relating molecular structure and estrogenic activity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2003, 43(6): 1974-1981
9. Waller C L. A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR, and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2004, 44: 758-765
10. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A comprehensive foundation (in Chinese). Ye S W, Shi Z Z translated. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2004
11. Salomon R, Hemmen J. Accelerating back propagation through dynamic self-adaptation. Neural Networks, 1996, 9(4): 589-601
12. Marini F, Roncaglioni A, Novic M. Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders. J Chem Inf Model, 2005, 45: 1507-1519
13. Bolanca T, Stefanovic SC, Regelja M, et al. Development of an inorganic cations retention model in ion chromatography by means of artificial neural networks with different two-phase training algorithms. J Chromatogr A, 2005, 1085: 74-85
14. Engin M, Demirag S, Engin EZ, et al. The classification of human tremor signals using artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl, 2007, 33: 754-761
15. Yao X J, Panaye A, Doucet J P. Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression. J Chem Inf Model, 2004, 44: 1257-1266
16. Liu H, Papa E, Gramatica P. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles. Chem Res Toxicol, 2006, 19: 1540-1548
17. Shepherd A J. Second-order methods for neural networks. New York: Springer, 1997
18. Fang H, Tong W, Shi L M, et al. Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic, and environmental estrogens. Chem Res Toxicol, 2001, 14: 280-294
19. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of molecular descriptors. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000
20. Johhnson S R. Prediction of physicochemical properties and biological activities from molecular structure and the use of computational neural networks for the analysis of sensor apply data. Doctor Dissertation. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 1999
21. Mcelroy N R. The prediction of physical properties and biological activities of orgnanic compounds from their molecular structures. Doctor Dissertation. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 2003
22. Rogers D, Hopfinger A J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 1994, 34: 854-866
23. Statsoft. Statistica Neural Networks. (Manual) Tulsa: Statsoft Inc, 1999
24. Wen X, Zhou L, Li X, et al. Application of MATLAB Neural Network (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2003. 272-274
25. Cramer R D, Patterson D E, Bunce J D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc, 1988, 110: 5959-5967
26. Asikainen A, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen K. Consensus kNN QSAR: A versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38(24): 6724-6729