Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country's butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1704, 2011, Pages 347-355

  Dincǎ, Vlad ^a,b   Zakharov, Evgeny V ^c   Hebert, Paul D N ^c   Vila, Roger ^a,d  

^a INSTITUTE OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY CSIC UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; DNA barcoding; Lepidoptera; Morphology; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DNA; ECOREGION; EUROPEAN UNION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLING; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; TYPE SPECIMEN;

ROMANIA;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 79251481867     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1089     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Brown, W. M., George Jr, M. & Wilson, A. C. 1979 Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1967-1971. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.76.4.1967)
2. Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & deWaard, J. R. 2003 Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 313-321. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2002.2218)
3. Hebert, P. D. N., Ratnasingham, S. & deWaard, J. R. 2003 Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.) 270, S96-S99. (doi:10. 1098/rsbl.2003.0025)
4. Lahaye, R. et al. 2008 DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2923-2928. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0709936105)
5. Chase, M. W. & Fay, M. F. 2009 Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science 325, 682-683. (doi:10.1126/science. 1176906)
6. Summerbell, R. C. et al. 2005 Microcoding: The second step in DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 1897-1903. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1721)
7. Saunders, G. W. 2005 Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: A preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 1879-1888. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1719)
8. Scicluna, S. M., Tawari, B. & Clark, C. G. 2006 DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. Protist 157, 77-85. (doi:10. 1016/j.protis.2005.12.001)
9. Sogin, M. L., Morrison, H. G., Huber, J. A.,Welch, D. M., Huse, S. M., Neal, P. R., Arrieta, J. M. & Herndl, G. J. 2006 Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12 115-12 120. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0605127103)
10. Ebach, M. C. & Holdrege, C. 2005 DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature 434, 697. (doi:10.1038/ 434697b)
11. Will, K. W., Mishler, B. D. & Wheeler, Q. 2005 The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54, 844-851. (doi:10.1080/ 10635150500354878)
12. Prendini, L. 2005 Comment on 'Identifying spiders through DNA barcoding'. Can. J. Zool. 83, 498-504. (doi:10.1139/Z05-025)
13. Cameron, S., Rubinoff, D. & Will, K. 2006 Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost? Syst. Biol. 55, 844-847. (doi:10.1080/ 10635150600960079)
14. Rubinoff, D., Cameron, S. & Will, K. 2006 A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for 'Barcoding' identification. J. Hered. 97, 581-594. (doi:10.1093/jhered/esl036)
15. Hebert, P. D. N., Stoeckle, M. Y., Zemlak, T. S. & Francis, C. M. 2004 Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PloS Biol. 2, e312. (doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0020312)
16. Clare, E. L., Lim, B. K., Engstrom, M. D., Eger, J. L. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2007 DNA barcoding of Neotropical bats: Species identification and discovery within Guyana. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 184-190. (doi:10.1111/j. 1471-8286.2006.01657.x)
17. Borisenko, A. V., Lim, B. K., Ivanova, N. V., Hanner, R. H. & Hebert, P. N. D. 2008 DNA barcoding in surveys of small mammal communities: A field study in Suriname. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 471-479. (doi:10.1111/ j.1471-8286.2007.01998.x)
18. Hebert, P. D. N., Penton, E. H., Burns, J. M., Janzen, D. H. & Hallwachs, W. 2004 Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14 812-14 817. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0406166101)
19. Janzen, D. H., Hajibabaei, M., Burns, J. M., Hallwachs, W., Remigio, E. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2005 Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 1835-1845. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1715)
20. Smith, A. M., Woodley, N. E., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2006 DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3657-3662. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.0511318103)
21. Smith, A. M., Rodriguez, J. J., Whitfield, J. B., Deans, A. R., Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2008 Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12 359-12 364. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0805319105)
22. Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D. H., Burns, J. M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2006 DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 968-971. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0510466103)
23. Burns, J. M., Janzen, D. H., Hajibabaei, M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2008 DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butterflies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6350-6355. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.0712181105)
24. Lukhtanov, V. A., Sourakov, A., Zakharov, E. V. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2009 DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: Increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 1302-1310. (doi:10.1111/j.1755- 0998.2009.02577.x)
25. Rach, J., DeSalle, R., Sarkar, I. N., Schierwater, B. & Hadrys, H. 2008 Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 237-247. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2007.1290)
26. Meyer, C. P. & Paulay, G. 2005 DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3, e422. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422. g008)
27. Vences, M., Thomas, M., Bonett, R. M. & Vieites, D. R. 2005 Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: Chances and challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 1859-1868. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1717)
28. Wiemers, M. & Fiedler, K. 2007 Does the DNA barcoding gap exist?-a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Front. Zool. 4, 8. (doi:10. 1186/1742-9994-4-8)
29. Elias, M., Hill, R. I., Willmott, K. R., Dasmahapatra, K. K., Brower, A. V. Z., Mallet, J. & Jiggins, C. D. 2007 Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2881-2889. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1035)
30. Whitworth, T. L., Dawson, R. D., Magalon, H. & Baudry, E. 2007 DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1731-1739. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2007.0062)
31. Shearer, T. L. & Coffroth, M. A. 2008 Barcoding corals: Limited by interspecific divergence, not intraspecific variation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 247-255. (doi:10.1111/j. 1471-8286.2007.01996.x)
32. Spooner, D. M. 2009 DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes. Am. J. Botany 96, 1177-1189. (doi:10.3732/ajb.0800246)
33. Dasmahapatra, K. K., Elias, M., Hill, R. I., Hoffman, J. I. & Mallet, J. 2009 Mitochondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 264-273. (doi:10.1111/j. 1755-0998.2009.02763.x)
34. Barrett, R. D. H. & Hebert, P. D. N. 2005 Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Can. J. Zool. 83, 481-491. (doi:10.1139/Z05-024)
35. Dincǎ, V., Székely, L., Kovács, S., Kovács, Z. & Vila, R. 2008 Pyrgus andromedae (Wallengren, 1853) (Hesperiidae) in the Romanian Carpathians. Nota lepid 31, 263-272.
36. Dincǎ, V., Cuvelier, S., Zakharov, E. V., Hebert, P. D. N. & Vila, R. In press. Biogeography, ecology and conservation of Erebia oeme in the Carpathians. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr.
37. Kudrna, O. 1977 A revision of the genus Hipparchia Fabricius. Faringdon, UK: E. W. Classey Ltd.
38. Wakeham-Dawson, A., Jakšić, P., Holloway, J. D. & Dennis, R. 2004 Multivariate analysis of male genital structures in the Hipparchia semele-muelleri-delattini complex (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) from the Balkans: How many taxa? Nota lepid 27, 103-124.
39. Alberti, B. 1943 Zur Frage der Hybridisation zwischen Colias erate Esp., hyale L. und edusa F. und ueber Umgrenzung der 3 Arten. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 33, 606-625.
40. Porter, A. & Geiger, H. J. 1995 Limitations to the inference of gene flow at regional geographic scales: An example from the Pieris napi group (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54, 329-348.
41. Descimon, H. & Mallet, J. 2009 Bad species. In Ecology of butterflies in Europe (eds J. Settele, M. Konvicka, T. Shreeve, R. Dennis & H. Van Dyck), pp. 219- 249. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G. & Siddall, M. 2006 The unholy trinity: Taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 1905-1916. (doi:10.1098/ rstb.2005.1722)
43. Schlick-Steiner, B. C., Seifert, B., Stauffer, C., Christian, E., Crozier, R. H. & Steiner, F. M. 2007 Without morphology, cryptic species stay in taxonomic crypsis following discovery. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 391-392.
44. Mallet, J. 1995 A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 294-299. (doi:10.1016/ 0169-5347(95)90031-4)
45. Thomas, J. A., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C. & Woyciechowski, M. 1989 Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia 79, 452-457. (doi:10.1007/BF00378660)
46. Als, T. D., Vila, R., Kandul, N. P., Nash, D. R., Yen, S.-H., Hsu, Y.-F., Mignault, A. A., Boomsma, J. J. & Pierce, N. E. 2004 The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature 432, 386-390. (doi:10.1038/nature03020)
47. Tartally, A., Rákosy, L., Vizauer, T.-C., Goia, M. & Varga, Z. 2008 Maculinea nausithous exploits Myrmica scabrinodis in Transylvania: Unusual host ant species of a Myrmecophilous butterfly in an isolated region (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51, 373-380.
48. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 2004 Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer & Associates.
49. Avise, J. C. 2000 Phylogeography: The history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Funk, D. J. & Omland, K. E. 2003 Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34, 397-423.
51. Zakharov, E. V., Lobo, N. F., Nowak, C. & Hellmann, J. J. 2009 Introgression as a likely cause of mtDNA paraphyly in two allopatric skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Heredity 102, 590-599. (doi:10.1038/hdy. 2009.26)
52. Barber, P. & Boyce, S. L. 2006 Estimating diversity of Indo-Pacific coral reef stomatopods through DNA barcoding of stomatopod larvae. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2053-2061. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3540)
53. Karen, W. E., Barnes, D. K. A., Clark, M. S. & Bowden, D. A. 2006 DNA barcoding: A molecular tool to identify Antarctic marine larvae. Deep Sea Res. Part II. Topical Studies in Oceanography 53, 1053-1060. (doi:10.1016/j. dsr2.2006.02.013)
54. Dincǎ, V. & Vila, R. 2008 Improving the knowledge on Romanian Rhopalocera, including the rediscovery of Polyommatus amandus (Schneider, 1792) (Lycaenidae) and an application of DNA-based identification. Nota lepid 31, 3-23.
55. Bickford, D., Lohman, D. J., Sodhi, N. S., Ng, P. K. L., Meier, R., Winker, K., Ingram, K. K. & Das, I. 2006 Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 148-155. (doi:10.1016/j. tree.2006.11.004)
56. Pfenninger, M. & Schwenk, K. 2007 Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 121. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-121)
57. Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K. R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson, F., Joron, M., Lamas, G. & Mallet, J. 2005 Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly 'suture zone'. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2525-2533. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3247)
58. Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G. A. C., Hebert, P. D. N. & Hickey, D. A. 2007 DNA barcoding: How it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet. 23, 167-172. (doi:10.1016/j.tig. 2007.02.001)