Relative importance of habitat and landscape scales on butterfly communities of urbanizing areas

Comptes Rendus - Biologies

Volumn 334, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 74-84

  Lizée, Marie Hélne ^a   Bonardo, Rémi ^c   Mauffrey, Jean Franois ^a   Bertaudire Montes, Valérie ^a   Tatoni, Thierry ^b   Deschamps Cottin, Magali ^a  

^a Aix Marseille University Marseille   (France)

^b AVIGNON UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Direction Territoriale Méditerranée   (France)

Author keywords

Functional traits; Land uses; Landscape context; Lepidoptera; RLQ analysis

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOINDICATOR; BUTTERFLY; DISTURBANCE; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND USE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; RURAL LANDSCAPE; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; FALLOW; FOREST; GARDEN; HABITAT; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; URBAN AREA; VINEYARD;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DIET; ECOSYSTEM; FRANCE; LARVA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; URBAN RENEWAL; URBANIZATION;

EUROPE;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 79151477117     PISSN: 16310691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. P. Clergeau Une écologie du paysage urbain 2007 Apogée Rennes
2. M.L. McKinney Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation BioScience 52 2002 883 890
3. T. Ricketts, and M. Imhoff Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: locating priority ecoregions for conservation Conserv. Ecol. 8 2003 1 16
4. o 10 2006 European Environment Agency Copenhaguen (Accessed 10 May 2010) http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea-report-2006-10/eea-report-10- 2006.pdf
5. K.O. Bergman, J. Askling, O. Ekberg, H. Ignell, H. Wahlman, and P. Milberg Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region Ecography 27 2004 619 628
6. A.M.K. Tscharntke, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter, and C. Thies Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management Ecol. Lett. 8 2005 857 874
7. C.A.M. Van Swaay, M. Warren, and G. Loïs Biotope use and trends of European butterflies J. Insect Conserv. 10 2006 189 209
8. M. Villa Rural life courses in Norway: living within the rural-urban complementarity Histor Fam 5 2000 473 490
9. C.A.M. Van Swaay The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe Biol. Conserv. 104 2002 315 318
10. J.G. Hodgson, G. Montserrat-Marti, J. Tallowin, K. Thompson, S. Díaz, M. Cabido, J.P. Grime, P.J. Wilson, S.R. Band, A. Bogard, R. Cabido, D. Cáceres, P. Castro-Diez, C. Ferrer, M. Maestro-Martinez, M.C. Pérez-Rontomé, M. Charles, J.H.C. Cornelissen, S. Dabbert, N. Pérez-Harguindeguy, T. Krimly, F.J. Sijtsma, D. Strijker, F. Vendramini, J. Guerrero-Campo, A. Hynd, G. Jones, A. Romo-Diez, L. De Torres Espuny, P. Villar-Salvador, and M.R. Zak How much will it cost to save grassland diversity? Biol. Conserv. 122 2005 263 273
11. A. Marco, T. Dutoit, M. Deschamps-Cottin, J.F. Mauffrey, M. Vennetier, and V. Bertaudire-Montes Gardens in urbanizing rural areas reveal an unexpected floral diversity related to housing density C. R. Biol. 331 2008 452 465
12. R.M. Smith, P.H. Warren, K. Thompson, and K.J. Gaston Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness Biodivers. Conserv. 15 2006 2415 2438 (Pubitemid 44543829)
13. K. Thompson, K.C. Austin, R.M. Smith, P.H. Warren, P.G. Angold, and K.J. Gaston Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context J. Veg. Sci. 14 2003 71 78
14. M. Kitahara, and K. Fujii Biodiversity and community structure of temperate butterfly species within a gradient of human disturbance: an analysis based on the concept of generalist vs. specialist strategies Res. Popul. Ecol. 36 1994 187 199
15. R.B. Blair, and A.E. Launer Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient Biol. Conserv. 80 1997 113 125
16. A. Erhardt Diurnal lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland J. Appl. Ecol. 22 1985 849 861
17. R.S. Niell, P.F. Brussard, and D.D. Murphy Butterfly community composition and oak woodland vegetation response to rural residential development Landsc Urban Plan 81 2007 235 245
18. J.A. Thomas, M.G. Telfer, D.B. Roy, C.D. Preston, J.J.D. Greenwood, J. Asher, R. Fox, R.T. Clarke, and J.H. Lawton Comparative losses of british butterflies, birds and plants and the global extinction crisis Science 303 2004 1879 1881
19. C Wiklund Oviposition, feeding and spatial separation of breeding and foraging habitats in a population of Leptidea sinapis (Lepidoptera) Oikos 28 1977 56 68
20. Y. Natuhara, and H. Hashimoto Spatial pattern and process in urban animal communities M.J. McDonnell, A.K. Hahs, J.H. Breuste, Ecology of Cities and Towns - A Comparative Approach 2009 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 197 214
21. UNESCO Thirty-third General Conference of the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation 2005 UNESCO Paris (Accessed 10 May 2010) http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001449/144964E.pdf
22. R. Joffre, S. Rambal, and C. Damesin Functional attributes in Mediterranean-type ecosystems F.I. Pugnaire, F. Valladares, Functional Plant Ecology Second Edition 2007 CRC Press New York 285 312
23. H.N. Le Houérou La Méditerranée en l'an 2050 : impacts respectifs d'une éventuelle évolution climatique et de la démographie sur la végétation, les écosystmes et l'utilisation des terres. Étude prospective Meteorologie 36 1991 4 37
24. I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats Ecol. Lett. 3 2000 449 456
25. L. Barbaro, and I. Van Halder Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life-history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes Ecography 32 2009 321 333
26. S. Doledec, D. Chessel, C.J.F. terBraak, and S. Champely Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3 1996 143 166
27. T. Lafranchis Les papillons de jour de France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles 2000 Biotope Mze
28. R. Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria (Accessed 10 May 2010) http://www.r-project.org
29. Ø. Hammer, D.A.T. Harper, and P.D. Ryan PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis Palaeontol Electron 4 2001 (Accessed 10 May 2010) http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001-1/past/past.pdf
30. J.H. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs Science 199 1978 1302 1310
31. M.J. McDonnell, S.T.A. Pickett, and R.V. Pouyat The application of the ecological gradient paradigm to the studie of urban effects M.J. McDonnell, S.T.A. Pickett, Humans as Components of Ecosystems 1993 Springer New-York 175 189
32. K. Saarinen, A. Valtonen, J. Jantunen, and S. Saarnio Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: does road type affect diversity and abundance? Biol. Conserv. 123 2005 403 412
33. C. Young Butterfly Activity in a Residential Garden Urban Habitats 2008 (Accessed 5 July 2010) http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v05n01/butterfly-full.html
34. M.L. Vickery Gardens: the neglected habitat A.S. Pullin, Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies 1995 Chapman & Hall London 123 134
35. V.K. Brown Insect, herbivores and plant succession Oikos 44 1985 17 22
36. A.M. Shapiro The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants Divers. Distrib. 8 2002 31 40
37. O. Tudor, R.L.H. Dennis, J.N. Greatorex-Davies, and T.H. Sparks Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern Biol. Conserv. 119 2004 397 403
38. M. Kitahara, K. Sei, and K. Fujii Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfly communities along a gradient of human disturbance: further analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept Popul. Ecol 42 2000 135 144
39. M. Kuussaari, J. Heliölä, J. Pöyry, and K. Saarinen Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe J. Insect Conserv. 11 2007 351 366
40. V. Devictor, R. Julliard, and F. Jiguet Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation Oikos 117 2008 507 514
41. M. Marvier, P. Kareiva, and M.G. Neubert Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation Risk Anal. 24 2004 869 878
42. J.D Olden, and T.P. Rooney On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15 2006 113 120
43. C. Stefanescu, S. Herrando, and F. Paramo Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors J. Biogeogr. 31 2004 905 915
44. T. Schmitt, and L. Rákosy Changes of traditional agrarian landscapes and their conservation implications: a case study of butterflies in Romania Divers. Distrib. 13 2007 855 862
45. J.A. Thomas The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future R.I. Vane-Wright, P.R. Ackery, The Biology of Butterflies 1984 Academic Press London 327 332
46. T.G. Shreeve Butterfly mobility A.S. Pullin, Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies 1995 Chapman & Hall London 37 45
47. P.J. DeVries, D. Murray, and R. Lande Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruit-feeding butterfly community in a Ecuadorian rain forest Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62 1997 343 364
48. J.M. Levy, and E.F. Connor Are gardens effective in butterfly conservation? A case study with the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor J. Insect Conserv. 8 2004 323 330
49. S.D. Graves, and A.M. Shapiro Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna Biol. Conserv. 110 2003 413 433