Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation

Risk Analysis

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 869-878

  Marvier, Michelle ^a   Kareiva, Peter ^a   Neubert, Michael G ^b  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological specialization; Invasive species; Nonnative species

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT DESTRUCTION; LANDSCAPES; RESOURCE AGENCIES;

BIODIVERSITY;

DISTURBANCE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; METAPOPULATION;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SPECIES; SPECIES INVASION; SYNECOLOGY;

COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 4544368460     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00485.x     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Hickman, J. C. (Ed.). (1993). The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Pimentel, D., McNair, S., Janecka, J., Wightman, J., Simmonds, C., O'Connell, C., Wong, E., Russel, L., Zern, J., Aquino, T., & Tsomondo, T. (2001). Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment, 84, 1-20.
3. Baker, H. G. (1965). Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In H. G. Baker & G. L. Stebbins (Eds.), The Genetics of Colonizing Species (pp. 147-168). New York: Academic Press.
4. Baker, H. G. (1974). The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 1-24.
5. Rejmanek, M., & Richardson, D. M. (1996). What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology, 77, 1655-1661.
6. Reichard, S. H., & Hamilton, C. W. (1997). Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology, 11, 193-203.
7. Scott, J. K., & Panetta, F. D. (1993). Predicting the Australian weed status of southern African plants. Journal of Biogeography, 20, 87-93.
8. Goodwin, B. J., McAllister, A. J., & Fahrig, L. (1999). Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conservation Biology, 132, 422-426.
9. Kattan, G. H. (1992). Rarity and vulnerability: The birds of the Cordillera Central of Columbia. Conservation Biology, 6, 64-70.
10. Sultan, S. E. (2001). Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology, 82, 328-343.
11. Rosecchi, E., Thomas, F., & Crivelli, A. J. (2001). Can life-history traits predict the fate of introduced species? A case study on two cyprinid fish in southern France. Freshwater Biology, 46, 845-863.
12. Radford, I. J., & Cousens, R. D. (2000). Invasiveness and comparative life-history traits of exotic and indigenous Senecio species in Australia. Oecologia, 125, 531-542.
13. McKinney, M. L. (1997). Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 495-516.
14. Angermeier, P. L. (1995). Ecological attributes of extinction-prone species: Loss of freshwater fishes of Virginia. Conservation Biology, 9, 143-158.
15. Nee S., & May, R. (1992). Dynamics of metapopulations: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61, 37-40.
16. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L., & Nowak, M. A. (1994). Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65-66.
17. Hill, M. G., & Caswell, H. (1999). Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes. Ecology Letters, 2, 121-127.
18. MacArthur, R. H. (1972). Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Cody, M. L. (1974). Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Neubert, M. G., & Caswell, H. (1997). Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology, 78, 653-665.
21. Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998). Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience, 48, 607-615.
22. Reed, R. A., Johnson-Barnard, J., & Baker, W. L. (1996). Contribution of roads to forest fragmentation in the Rocky Mountains. Conservation Biology, 10, 1098-1106.
23. Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000). Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology, 14, 18-30.
24. Hutchinson, G. E. (1951). Copepodology for the ornithologist. Ecology, 32, 571-577.
25. Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r and K selection. American Naturalist, 102, 592-597.
26. Stearns, S. C. (1976). Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 3-47.
27. Tilman, D., & Lehman, C. L. (1997). Habitat destruction and species extinctions. In D. Tilman & P. Kareiva (Eds.), Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions (pp. 233-249). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Knops, J. M. H., Griffin, J. R., & Royalty, A. C. (1995). Introduced and native plants of the Hastings Reservation, Central Coastal California: A comparison. Biological Conservation, 71, 115-123.
29. Strickler, K. (1979). Specialization and foraging efficiency of solitary bees. Ecology, 60, 958-1009.
30. Dueser R. D., & Hallett, J. G. (1980). Competition and habitat selection in a forest floor small mammal fauna. Oikos, 35, 293-297.
31. Dykhuizen, D., & Davies, M. (1980). An experimental model: Bacterial specialists and generalists competing in chemostats. Ecology, 61, 1213-1227.
32. Hallet, J. G., O'Connell, M. A., & Honeycutt, R. L. (1983). Competition and habitat selection: Test of a theory using small mammals. Oikos, 40, 175-181.
33. Partridge, L., & Green, P. (1987). An advantage for specialist feeding in jackdaws, Corvus monedula. Animal Behavior, 35, 982-990.
34. Dawson, L. H. J., Renaud, F., Guégan, J. F., & de Meeûs, T. (2000). Experimental evidence of asymmetrical competition between two species of parasitic copepods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 1973-1978.
35. Jones, M., Mandelik, Y., & Dayan, T. (2001). Coexistence of temporally partitioned spiny mice: Roles of habitat structure and foraging behavior. Ecology, 82, 2164-2176.
36. Perlman, S. J., & Jaenike, J. (2001). Competitive interactions and persistence of two nematode species that parasitize Drosophila recens. Ecology Letters, 4, 577-584.
37. Cornell, H. V., & Hawkins, B. A. (2003). Herbivore responses to plant secondary compounds: A test of phytochemical co-evolution theory. American Naturalist, 161, 507-522.