Ruminal degradability, digestibility, energy content, and influence on nitrogen turnover of various Mediterranean by-products in fat-tailed Awassi sheep

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 163, Issue 2-4, 2011, Pages 99-110

  Abbeddou, S ^a,b   Riwahi, S ^b   Iniguez L ^b   Zaklouta, M ^b   Hess, H D ^c   Kreuzer, M ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH IN THE DRY AREAS ICARDA   (Syrian Arab Republic)

^c AGROSCOPE LIEBEFELD POSIEUX RESEARCH STATION ALP   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Lentil; Nutritional value; Olive cake; Sheep; Sugar beet pulp; Tomato pomace

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; HORDEUM; LENS CULINARIS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; OVIS ARIES; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 78951482799     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aguilera J.F., Molina E. Valorisation nutritive d'un grignon d'olive traité à la soude. Ann. Zootech. 1986, 35:205-218.
2. Ammerman C.B., Arrington L.R., Loggins P.E., McCall J.T., Davis G.K. Tomato by-products as feedstuffs: nutritive value of dried tomato pulp for ruminants. Agric. Food Chem. 1963, 11:347-349.
3. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 1997, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
4. Barnes J. Managing the waters of Bath country: the politics of water scarcity in Syria. Geopolitics 2009, 14:510-530.
5. Beever D.E., Mould F.L. Forage evaluation for efficient ruminant livestock production. Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition 2000, 15-42. CAB International, Oxon, UK. D.I. Givens, E. Owen, R.F.E. Axford, H.M. Omed (Eds.).
6. Ben Salem H., Znaidi I.-A. Partial replacement of concentrate with tomato pulp and olive cake-based feed blocks as supplements for lambs fed wheat straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 147:206-222.
7. Bodas R., Giráldez F.J., López S., Rodríguez A.B., Mantecón A.R. Inclusion of sugar beet pulp in cereal-based diets for fattening lambs. Small Rum. Res. 2007, 71:250-254.
8. Butler L.G., King W.R., McDonald C.L. Growth of young Merino sheep grazing cereal stubbles and supplemented ad libitum with oats, of different crude protein contents, sprayed with various amounts of urea. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1987, 27:339-342.
9. Chen X.B., Gomes M.J. Estimation of Microbial Protein Supply to Sheep and Cattle Based on Urinary Excretion of Purine Derivatives - An Overview of the Technical Details. Occasional Publication 1992 1992, International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK.
10. Cooper S.D.B., Kyriazakis I., Oldham J.D. The effects of physical form of feed, carbohydrate source, and inclusion of sodium bicarbonate on the diet selections of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 74:1240-1251.
11. Denek N., Can A. Feeding value of wet tomato pomace ensiled with wheat straw and wheat grain for Awassi sheep. Small Rum. Res. 2006, 65:260-265.
12. Dhanoa M.S. On the analysis of Dacron bag data for low degradability feeds. Grass Forage Sci. 1988, 43:431-444.
13. Dohme F., Graf C.M., Arrigo Y., Wyss U., Kreuzer M. Effect of botanical characteristics, growth stage and method of conservation on factors related to the physical structure of forage - an attempt towards a better understanding of the effectiveness of fibre in ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 138:205-227.
14. FAO Better Utilization of Crop Residues and Byproducts in Animal Feeding: Research Guidelines-1. State of Knowledge. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers 50 1985, vol. 1. p. 213.
15. FAO Animal Feed Resources Information System 2010, (accessed 14.04.10) http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/afris/Index_en.htm.
16. Fondevila M., Guada J.A., Gasa J., Castrillo C. Tomato pomace as protein supplement for growing lambs. Small Rum. Res. 1994, 13:117-126.
17. Gasa J., Castrillo C., Baucells M.D., Guada J.A. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1989, 25:67-77.
18. Goldman A., Genizi A., Yulzari A., Seligman N.G. Improving the reliability of the two-stage in vitro assay for ruminant feed digestibility by calibration against in vivo data from a wide range of sources. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1987, 18:233-245.
19. González J., Andrés S. Rumen degradability of some feed legume seeds. Anim. Res. 2003, 52:17-25.
20. Hadjipanayiotou M. The role of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products in filling the deficit of animal feedstuffs in the Middle East. Improvement of Crop-Livestock System in West Asia and North Africa 1997, 372-385. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. N. Haddad, R. Tutwiler, E. Thomson (Eds.).
21. Iconomou D., Kandylis K., Israilides C., Nikokyris P. Protein enhancement of sugar beet pulp by fermentation and estimation of protein degradability in the rumen of sheep. Small Rum. Res. 1998, 27:55-61.
22. INRA Tables of Composition and Nutritional Value of Feed Materials 2004, Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands and INRA/Paris, France, p. 304.
23. Makkar H.P.S. Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage, A Laboratory Manual 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, p. 116.
24. McDonald I. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. 1981, 96:251-252.
25. Mehrez A.Z., Ørskov E.R. Study of artificial fiber bag technique for determining digestibility of feeds in rumen. J. Agric. Sci. 1977, 88:645-650.
26. Meschy F., Faurie F., Gueguen L. Bilans minéraux et disponibilité du calcium chez les moutons recevant des pulpes de betteraves. INRA Prod. Anim. 1993, 6:47-51.
27. Molina-Alcaide E., Nefzaoui A. Recycling of olive oil by-products: possibilities of utilization in animal nutrition. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1996, 38:227-235.
28. Molina-Alcaide E., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R., Moumen A., Martín García I. Chemical composition and nitrogen availability for goats and sheep of some olive by-products. Small Rum. Res. 2003, 49:329-336.
29. Molina-Alcaide E., Yáñez-Ruiz D.R. Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 147:247-264.
30. Mustafa A.F., Thaker P.A., McKinnon J.J., Christensen D.A., Racz V.J. Nutritional value of feed grade chickpeas for ruminants and pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80:1581-1588.
31. National Research Council (NRC) United States-Canadian Tables of Feed Composition 1982, National Academy Press, Washington, USA, p. 148. 3rd rev. ed.
32. National Research Council (NRC) Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals 1985, National Academy Press, Washington, USA, p. 99. 6th rev. ed.
33. Normand J., Thériez M., Bas P., Aurousseau B., Sauvant D. Effect of energy source, cereals vs. sugar beet pulp, on growth performance and carcass quality of intensively reared lambs. Ann. Zootech. 1999, 48:367-380.
34. Porter L.J., Hrstich L.N., Chan B.G. The conversion of procyanidin and prodelphinidins to cyaniding and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 1986, 25:223-230.
35. Purroy A., Echaide H., Muñoz F., Arana A., Mendizabal J.A. The effect of protein source of legume seeds on the growth and fattening of lambs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1992, 34:93-100.
36. 2. J. Anim. Sci. 1967, 26:424-429.
37. Sampedro I., Romero C., Ocampo J.A., Brenes M., García I. Removal of monomeric phenols in dry mill olive residue by saprobic fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52:4487-4492.
38. Sansoucy R. Olive by-Products for Animal Feed. Online: FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No. 43 1985, (accessed 16.02.10) http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/X6545E/X6545E00.htm.
39. SAS SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9.2 2009, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
40. Sgorlon S., Stradaioli G., Zanin D., Stefanon B. Biochemical and molecular responses to antioxidant supplementation in sheep. Small Rum. Res. 2006, 64:143-151.
41. Stanford K., Wallins G.L., Lees B.M., Mündel H.-H. Use of lentil screenings in the diets of early weaned lambs and ewes in the second trimester of pregnancy. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1999, 81:249-264.
42. Surra J., Purroy A., Muñoz F., Treacher T. Lentils and faba beans in lamb diets. Small Rum. Res. 1992, 7:43-49.
43. Terramoccia S., Bartocci S., Amici A., Martillotti F. Protein and protein-free dry matter rumen degradability in buffalo, cattle and sheep fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000, 65:185-195.
44. Tilley J.M.A., Terry R.A. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 1963, 18:104-111.
45. UNEP/FAO Food, agriculture and the environment in the Mediterranean basin. Ambio 1977, 6:368-370. (The Mediterranean: a special issue).
46. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3583-3597.
47. Wang N. Effect of variety and crude protein content on dehulling quality and on the resulting chemical composition of red lentil (Lens culinaris). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88:885-890.
48. Weiss W.P., Frobose D.L., Koch M.E. Wet tomato pomace ensiled with corn plants for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:2896-2900.
49. Woodman, H.E., 1945. United Kingdom. Ministry of Agricuture, Fisheries and Food. Bulletin No. 124.
50. World Bank, 2008. Commodity markets review. The development prospects group (DECPG). The World Bank (November 12).
51. Yuangklang C., Vasupen K., Wongsuthavas S., Bureenok S., Panyakaew P., Alhaidary A., Mohamed H.E., Beynen A.C. Effect of replacement of soyabean meal by dried tomato pomace on rumen fermentation and nitrogen metabolism in beef cattle. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2010, 5:256-260.