Feeding value of wet tomato pomace ensiled with wheat straw and wheat grain for Awassi sheep

Small Ruminant Research

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 260-265

  Denek, N ^a   Can, A ^a  

^a HARRAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Digestibility; Sheep; Tomato pomace silage; Wheat grain; Wheat straw

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; OVIS ARIES; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 33747779702     PISSN: 09214488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. (1984), Association of Official Analytical Chemists, The William Byrd Press, Inc., Richmond, VA 500 pp
2. Bartocci S., Pace V., and Verna M. Chemical composition and nutritive value of a by-product of the tomato concentrate industry. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 52 (1982) 191
3. Bradowski D.L., and Geisman J.R. Protein content and amino acid composition of seeds from tomatoes at various stages of ripeness. J. Food Sci. 45 (1980) 225-235
4. Caluya R.R., and Sair R.R. Exploratory trial on the feeding of tomato pomace to growing cattle. Paper Presented at the 1995 Livestock and Forage Commodity Review. Ilocos Agriculture and Resources Research and Development Consortium. Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University, Bacnotan, La Union, June 10-11 (1995) 6 pp
5. Capci T., Sayan Y., and Alcicek A. Kurutulmus ve silolanmi{dotless}s domates posasinin yem degeri uzerine bir arastirma (Research on feed value of dried or ensiled tomato pomace). J. Agric. Fac. E.U.Z.F. Dergisi 3 (1995) 119-126 (Ege University Press, Izmir, Turkey)
6. Cochran, R.C., M.I. Galyean, 1994. Measurement of in-vivo forage digestion by ruminants. In: Fahey Jr., G.F. (Ed.), Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization. Amer Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA, pp. 613-643.
7. Ensminger M.E., Oldfield J.L., and Heinemann W.W. Feeds and Nutrition (1990), Ensminger Publishing Co., USA
8. Ergen A., and Isi{dotless}k H. Kurutulmus domates posasinin kuzu rasyonlarindaki bugday kepegi yerine ikame edilmesiyle kuzulardaki canli{dotless} agirlik artisi ve yemden yararlanma yetenegi uzerine arastirmalar (Research on Replacing Wheat Bran with Tomato Pomace in Diet on Gain and Feed Efficiency of Lambs) (1988), Agriculture and Rural Works Ministry Press, Ankara, Turkey T.C. Tarim-Koy Isleri Bakanligi Bursa Gida Teknolojisi Aras. Enst. Yayini
9. Ergul M. Yemler Bilgisi ve Teknolojisi (Feed and Feed Technology) vol. II (1993), University of Ege, Faculty of Agriculture Press, Izmir, Turkey Baski, E.Ü.Z.F. Yayinlari No. 487, Ders Kitabi 318.S. Bornova, Izmir
10. Gasa J., Castrillo C., Baucells M.D., and Guada J.A. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 25 (1989) 67-77
11. Goering M.K., and Van Soest P.J. Forage Fibre Analysis. Agricultural Handbook, No. 379 (1970), ARC, USDA, Washington, DC
12. Hadjipanayiotou M. Laboratory evaluation of ensiled olive cake, tomato pulp and poultry litter. Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 6 2 (1994). pp. 1-5 www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd6/2/Cyprus1.htm
13. Hasimoglu S., Cakir A., Aksoy A., and Ozen N. Domates salcasi{dotless} artiklarinin (kuru domates posasi) kaba yem olarak kullanilma olanagi uzerinde bir cali{dotless}sma (An investigation on usage of tomato paste industry residues as a roughage source). J. Agric. Fac. 10 (1979) 139-150 (Ataturk University Press, Erzurum, Turkey, A.U.Z.F. Dergisi)
14. IGEME, 2001. Dis Ticaret Istatistik Kayitlari (Statistical Records of Turkish Export Trade), Ankara, Turkey.
15. Karabulut A., Filya I., Canbolat O., Degirmencioglu T., and Umur H. Degişik yontemlerle islenmis domates posasi silajlarinin kuzu besisinde kullanilma olanaklari (Possibilities of using tomato pomace silages at lamb fattening treated with different methods). International Animal Husbandry Conference. Uluslar Arasi Hayvancilik Kongresi, 21-24, Eylül, İzmir, Turkey (1999) 37-46
16. Kelly P. Sugar beet pulp: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 8 (1983) 1-18
17. Kilic A. Silo Yemi (Silage Feed) (1984), Bilgehan Press, İzmir, Turkey 350 pp. (Bilgehan Basimevi, İzmir)
18. Marten G.C., and Barnes R.F. Prediction of energy digestibility of forages with In vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzyme systems. In: Pigden W.J., Balch C.C., and Graham M. (Eds). Proceedings of the International Workshop on Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feed (1980), Int. Dev. Res. Center, Ottawa, Canada
19. Polan C.E., Stieve D.E., and Garret J.C. Protein preservation and ruminal degradation of ensiled forage treated with formic acid, ammonia or microbial inoculant. J. Dairy Sci. 81 (1998) 765-776
20. Ørskov E.R. Nutritional principles in utilization of waste and by-products. By-Products and Wastes in Animal Nutrition, No. 3 (1980), Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. pp. 13-17
21. SAS. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. fifth ed. (1989), SAS Inc., Cary, NC
22. Tahmasbi R., Nasiri H., Naserian A., and Saremi B. Effect of different levels of mixed corn plant and tomato pomace on milk production and composition in Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 80 Suppl. 1 (2002) 299
23. Tilley J.M.A., and Terry R.A. A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18 (1963) 104-111
24. Weiss W.P., Frobose D.L., and Koch M.E. Wet tomato pomace ensiled with corn plants for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80 (1997) 2896-2900
25. Wojcik S., Soroka T., Matras J., Wojtasik J., Tarkowsk A., and Zapolski T. Die Einsilierung von Tomato Abfaellen und die Verwendbarkeit der Silagen zur Fütterung von Wiederkaeuern (Ensiling of tomato byproduct and their use in feeding ruminants). Landwirtschafliches Zentralblatt, Abteilung. III 25 Jahrgang 5 (1980) 835