The application of cophylogenic tools to gene sets

Taxon

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1843-1852

  Baum, Bernard R ^a   Johnson, Douglas A ^b  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cophylogeny; Evolutionary models; ParaFit; Tanglegram

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; GENE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 78751507560     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.596015     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abascal, F., Posada, D. & Zardoya, R. 2007. MtArt: A new model of amino acid replacement for Arthropoda. Molec. Biol. Evol. 24: 1-5.
2. Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. 2005. ProtTest: Selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21: 2104-2105.
3. Barker, F.K. & Lutzoni, F.M. 2002. The utility of the Incongruence Length Difference test. Syst. Biol. 51: 625-637.
4. Baum, B.R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data set for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41: 3-10.
5. Baum, B.R., Edwards, T. & Johnson, D.A. 2010. Co-dependence of repetitive sequence classes in genomes: The phylogenetic analysis of 5S rDNA families in Hordeum (Triticeae: Poaceae). Genome 53: 180-202.
6. Baum, B.R. & Ragan, M.A. 2004. The MRP method. Pp. 17-34 in: Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. (ed.), Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. (ed.). 2004. Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Cerutti, H., Johnson, A.M., Boyton, J.E. & Gillham, N.W. 1995. Inhibition of chloroplast DNA recombination and repair by dominant negative mutants of Escherichia coli RecA. Molec. Cell. Biol. 15: 3003-3011
9. Charleston, M.A. 2002. Principles of cophylogenetic maps. Pp. 122-147 in: Lässig, M. & Vailleriani, A. (eds.), Biological evolution and statistical physics. Berlin: Springer.
10. Clegg, M.T., Gaut, B.S., Learn, G.H., Jr. & Morton, B.R. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 6795-6801.
11. Cunningham, C.W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molec. Biol. Evol. 14: 733-740,
12. Dayhoff, M.O., Schwartz, R.M. & Orcutt, B.C. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 345-352 in: Dayhoff, M.O. (ed.), Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Washington, D.C.: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
13. Drummond, A.J., Ho, S.Y.W., Phillips, M.J. & Rambaut, A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating. PLoS Biol. 4: e88. Doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088
14. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
15. Gu, X., Fu, Y.X. & Li, W.H. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Molec. Biol. Evol. 12: 546-557.
16. Harris, A.J., Xiang, Q.Y. & Thomas, D.T. 2009. Phylogeny, origin and biogeographic history of Aesculus L. (Sapindales) - an update from combined analysis of DNA sequences, morphology, and fossils. Taxon 58: 108-126.
17. Hasegawa, M., Kishino, K. & Yano, T. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Molec. Evol. 22: 160-174.
18. Huggins, P., Owen, M. & Yoshida, R. 2009. First steps toward the geometry of cophylogeny. ArXiv: 0809.1908v3 [q-bio.PE], eprint service, unpaginated PDF, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.1908v3 (accessed 20 March 2010).
19. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R. & Thornton, J.M. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer Appl. Biosci. 8: 275-282.
20. Jukes, T.H. & Cantor, C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in: Munro, H.N. (ed.), Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press.
21. Kellogg, E.A., Appels, R. & Mason-Gamer, R.J. 1996. When genes tell different stories: The diploid genera of the Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 21: 321-347.
22. Kim, S.T. & Donoghue, M.J. 2008. Incongruence between cpDNA and nrITS trees indicates extensive hybridization within Eupersicaria (Polygonaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 95: 112-1135.
23. Kluge, A. 2004. On total evidence: For the re cord. Cladistics 20: 205-207.
24. Lang, B.F., Gray, M.W. & Burger, G. 1999. Mitochondrial genome evolution and the origin of eukaryotes. Annual Rev. Genet. 33: 351-97.
25. Legendre, P. & Anderson M.J. 1998. Program DistPCoA. http://www.bio.umontreal.ca/Casgrain/en/labo/distpcoa.html.
26. Legendre, P., Desdevises, Y. & Bazin, E. 2002. A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution. Syst. Biol. 51: 217-234.
27. Leigh, J.W., Susko, E., Baumgartner, M. & Roger, A.J. 2008. Testing congruence in phylogenomic analysis. Syst. Biol. 57: 104-115.
28. Liu, L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 24: 2542-2543.
29. Liu, L. & Pearl, D.K. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: Reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 56: 504-514.
30. Lung, B., Zemann, A., Madej, M.J., Schuelke, M., Techritz, S., Ruf, S., Bock, R. & Hüttenhofer, A. 2006. Identification of small noncoding RNAs from mitochondria and chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 3842-3852.
31. Maddison, W.P. & Knowles, L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 58: 21-30.
32. Magallón, S.A. & Sanderson, M.J. 2005. Angiosperm divergencetimes: The effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints. Evolution 59: 1653-1670.
33. Measy, G.J., Vences, M., Drewes, R.C., Chiari, Y., Melo, M. & Boules, B. 2007. Freshwater paths across the ocean: Molecular phylogeny of the frog Ptychadena newtoni gives insights into amphibian colonization of oceanic islands. J. Biogeogr. 34: 7-20.
34. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P., Auch, A.F., Huson, D.H. & Göker, M. 2007.CopyCat: Cophenetic analysis tool. Bioinformatics 23: 898-900.
35. Mickevich, M.F. & Farris, J.S. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30: 351-370.
36. Nylander, J.A.A., Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Nieves-Aldrey, J.L. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53: 47-67.
37. Page, R.D.M. 1995a. Parallel phylogenies: Reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10: 155-173.
38. Page, R.D.M. 1995b TreeMap program. http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treemap.
39. Pamilo, P. & Nei, M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Molec. Biol. Evol. 5: 568-583.
40. Planet, P.J. 2006. Tree disagreement: Measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies. J. Biomed. Informatics 39: 86-102.
41. Posada, D. 2008. ModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molec. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256.
42. Queiroz, A. de & Gatesy, J. 2006. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 34-41.
43. Ragan, M.A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 1: 53-58.
44. Ramirez, M.J. 2006. Further problems with the incongruence length difference test: "hypercongruence" effect and multiple comparisons. Cladistics 22: 289-295.
45. Rodrigo, A.G., Kelly-Borges, M., Bergquist, P.R. & Bergquist, L. 1993. A randomisation test of null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. New Zealand J. Bot. 31: 257-268.
46. Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J.L., Marín, A. & Medina, J.R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142: 485-501.
47. Rokas, S. & Holland, P.M. 2000. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 454-459.
48. Rokas, A., Williams, B.L., King, N. & Carroll, S.B. 2003. Genomescale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
49. Rydin, C., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Khodabandeh, A. & Bremer, B. 2009. Evolutionary relationships in the Spermacoceae alliance (Rubiaceae) using information from six molecular loci: Insights into systematic affinities of Neohymenopogon and Mouretia. Taxon 58: 793-810.
50. Shi, T., Bibby, T.S., Jiang, L., Irwin, A.J. & Falkowski, P.G. 2005. Protein interactions limit the rate of evolution of photosynthetic genes in cyanobacteria. Molec. Biol. Evol. 22: 2179-2189
51. Smith, S.A., Beaulieu, J.M. & Donoghue, M.J. 2009. Mega phylogeny approach for comparative biology: An alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches. BMC Evol. Biol. 9: 37. Doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-37.
52. Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
53. Stamatakis, A., Auch, A.F., Meier-Kolthoff, J. & Göker, M. 2007. AxPoords & parallel AxParafit: Statistical co-phylogenetic analyses on thousands of taxa. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 405. Doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-405.
54. Tawaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures Math. Life Sci. 17: 57-86.
55. Templeton, A.R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction end onucleasecleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
56. Thorne, J.L. & Kishino, H. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionaryrate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51: 689-702.
57. Wadell, P.J. & Penny, D. 1996. Evolutionary trees of apes and humans from DNA sequences. Pp. 53-73 in: Lock, A. & Peters, C.R. (eds.), Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Yang, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Molec. Biol. Evol. 10: 1396-1401.
59. Yang, Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Molec. Evol. 39: 105-111.
60. Yang, Z. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Molec. Evol. 39: 306-314.
61. Zhang, X.L., Wang, Y.J., Ge, X.J., Yuan, Y.M., Yang, H.L. & Liu, J.Q. 2009. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Gentiana sect. Cruciata (Gentianaceae) based on four chloroplast DNA datasets. Taxon 58: 862-870.