Further problems with the incongruence length difference test: "Hypercongruence" effect and multiple comparisons

Cladistics

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 289-295

  Ramírez, Martín J ^a  

^a MUSEO ARGENTINO DE CIENCIAS NATURALES BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 33745032085     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00106.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aagesen L. Petersen G. Seberg O., 2005. Sequence length variation, indel costs, and congruence in sensitivity analysis. Cladistics, 21, 15 30.
2. Ahyong S.T. O'Meally D., 2004. Phylogeny of the Decapoda Reptantia: resolution using three molecular loci and morphology. Raffles Bull. Zool. 52, 673 693.
3. Allard M. Carpenter J., 1996. On weighting and congruence. Cladistics 12, 183 198.
4. Baker R. DeSalle R., 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46, 654 673.
5. Baker R.H. Wilkinson G.E.S. DeSalle R., 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types at molecular data used infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50, 87 105.
6. Ballard J.W.O., 2000. When one is not enough: introgression of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1126 1130.
7. Barker F.K. Lutzoni F.M., 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51, 625 637.
8. Brown E.W. Kotewicz M.L. Cebula T.A., 2002. Detection of recombination among Salmonella enterica strains using the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 102 120.
9. Brown M.K. LeClerc M.J.E. Cebula T.A., 2003. Limited boundaries for extensive horizontal gene transfer among Salmonella pathogens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 15676 15681.
10. Bull J. Huelsenbeck J. Cunningham C. Swofford D. Waddell P., 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 384 397.
11. Cunningham C., 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 733 740.
12. Damgaard J. Cognato A.I., 2003. Sources of character conflict in a clade of water striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Cladistics 19, 512 526.
13. Dolphin K. Belshaw R. Orme C.D.L. Quicke D.L.J., 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17, 401 406.
14. Downie D.A. Gullan P.J., 2005. Phylogenetic congruence of mealybugs and their primary endosymbionts. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 315 324.
15. Dowton M. Austin A.D., 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51, 19 31.
16. Escobar-Páramo P. Sabbagh A. Darlu P. Pradillon O. Vaury C. Denamur E. Lecointre G., 2004. Decreasing the effects of horizontal gene transfer on bacterial phylogeny: the Escherichia coli case study. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 30, 243 250.
17. Farris J.S. Kallersjo M. Kluge A.G. Bult C., 1995a. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315 319.
18. Farris J.S. Kallersjo M. Kluge A.G. Bult C., 1995b. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 570 572.
19. Felsenstein J., 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
20. Gatesy J. O'Grady P. Baker R.H., 1999. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics, 15, 271 313.
21. Goloboff P.A. Farris J.S. Källersjö M. Oxelman B. Ramírez M.J. Szumik C.A., 2003. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19, 324 332.
22. Goloboff P.A. Farris J.S. Nixon K., 2003-2005. TNT: Tree Analysis Using New Technology Version 1.0. Program and documentation, available from the authors, and at http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/.
23. Graham S.W. Kohn J.R. Morton B.R. Eckenwalder E. Barrett C.H., 1998. Phylogenetic congruence and discordance among one morphological and three molecular data sets from Pontederiaceae. Syst. Biol. 47, 545 567.
24. Hipp A.L. Hall J.C. Sytsma K.J., 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 53, 81 89.
25. Johnson K.P. Drown M.D. Clayton D.H., 2001. A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis. Zool. Scripta 30, 79 87.
26. Kroken S. Taylor J.W., 2001. Outcrossing and recombination in the lichenized fungus Letharia. Fungal Genet. Ecol. 34, 83 92.
27. Lambkin C.L., 2004. Partitioned Bremer support localizes significant conflict in bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae: Anthracinae). Invert. Syst. 18, 351 360.
28. Lavoué S. Sullivan J.P. Hopkins C.D., 2003. Phylogenetic utility of the first two introns of the S7 ribosomal protein gene in African electric fishes (Mormyroidea: Teleostei) and congruence with other molecular markers. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 78, 273 292.
29. Lecointre G. Rachdi L. Darlu P. Denamur E., 1998. Escherichia coli molecular phylogeny using the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1685 1695.
30. Lee M.S.Y., 2001. Uninformative characters and apparent conflict between molecules and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 676 680.
31. Lopez-Vaamonde C. Rasplus J.Y. Weiblen G.W. Cook J.M., 2001. Molecular phylogenies of fig waSPS: partial cocladogenesis of pollinators and parasites. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 21, 55 71.
32. Quicke D.L. Belshaw R., 1999. Incongruence between morphological data sets: an example from the evolution of endoparasitism among parasitic waSPS (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Syst. Biol. 48, 436 454.
33. Sanderson M.J. Wojciechowski M.F. Hu J.-M. Sher Khan T. Brady S.G., 2000. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 782 797.
34. Sota T., 2002. Radiation and reticulation: extensive introgressive hybridization in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus inferred from mitochondrial gene genealogy. Popul. Ecol. 44, 145 156.
35. Sota T. Vogler A.P., 2001. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50, 39 59.
36. Sullivan J., 1996. Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 45, 375 380.
37. Swofford D.L. Olsen G.J. Waddell P.J. Hillis D.M., 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In : Hillis D.M. Moritz C. Mable B.K. (Eds Molecular Systematics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 407 514.
38. Thornton J.W. DeSalle R., 2000. A new method to localize and test the significance of incongruence: detecting domain shuffling in the nuclear receptor superfamily. Syst. Biol. 49, 183 201.
39. Vogler A.P. Cardoso A. Barraclough T.G., 2005. Exploring rate variation among and within sites in a densely sampled tree: species level phylogenetics of North American tiger beetles (genus Cicindela). Syst. Biol. 54, 4 20.
40. Wheeler W., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321 331.
41. Yoder A.D. Irwin J.A. Payseur B.A., 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50, 408 424.
42. Yoon H.S. Hackett J.D. Pinto G. Bhattacharya D., 2002. The single, ancient origin of chromist plastids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 15507 15512.