Bayes-Optimal chemotaxis

Neural Computation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 336-373

  Mortimer, Duncan ^a   Dayan, Peter ^b   Burrage, Kevin ^a,c   Goodhill, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL POLARITY; CHEMOTAXIS; GROWTH CONE; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CELL POLARITY; CHEMOTAXIS; GROWTH CONES; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 78651501521     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00075     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). (1970). Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover.
2. Aeschlimann, M., & Tettoni, L. (2001). Biophysical model of axonal pathfinding. Neurocomput., 38, 87-92.
3. Andrews, B. W., & Iglesias, P. A. (2007). An information-theoretic characterization of the optimal gradient sensing response of cells. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, 1490-1497.
4. Aquino, G., & Endres, R. G. (2010). Increased accuracy of ligand sensing by receptor internalization. Phys. Rev. E., 81, 021909.
5. Arrieumerlou, C.& Meyer,T. (2005).Alocal coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. Dev. Cell, 8, 215-227.
6. Berg, H. C., & Purcell, E. M. (1977). Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. J., 20, 193-219.
7. Bialek, W., & Setayeshgar, S. (2005). Physical limits to biochemical signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 10040-10045.
8. Bray, D., Levin, M. D., & Morton-Firth, C. J. (1998). Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity. Nature, 393, 85-88.
9. Charron, F., Stein, E., Jeong, J., McMahon, A. P., & Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2003). The morphogen Sonic Hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with Netrin-1 in midline axon guidance. Cell, 113, 11-23.
10. DeLisi, C., & Marchetti, F. (1982). A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. Cell Biophys., 4 211-229.
11. Downey, G. P. (1994). Mechanisms of leukocyte motility and chemotaxis. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 6, 113-124.
12. Doya, K., Ishii, S., Pouget, A., & Rao, R. P. N. (Eds.). (2007). Bayesian brain: Probabilistic approaches to neural coding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Endres, R. G., & Wingreen, N. S. (2008). Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 15749-15754.
14. Endres, R. G., & Wingreen, N. S. (2009). Maximum likelihood and the single receptor. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 158101.
15. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
16. Fisher, P. R., Merkl, R., & Gerisch, G. (1989). Quantitative analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in dictyostelium discoideum by using an image processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients. J. Cell Biol., 108, 973-984.
17. Fuller, D., Chen, W., Adler, M., Groisman, A., Levine, H., Rappel, W.-J., et al. (2010). External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 9656-9659.
18. Goodhill, G. J. (1997). Diffusion in axon guidance. Eur. J. Neurosci., 9, 1414-1421.
19. Goodhill, G. J., & Baier, H. (1998). Axon guidance: Stretching gradients to the limit. Neur. Comput., 10, 521-527.
20. Goodhill, G., & Urbach, J. (1999). Theoretical analysis of gradient detection by growth cones. J. Neurobiol., 41, 230-241.
21. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
22. Hao, J. C., Yu, T. W., Fujisawa, K., Culotti, J. G., Gengyo-Ando, K., Mittani, S., et al. (2001). C. elegans slit acts in midline, dorsal-ventral, and anterior-posterior guidance via the SAX-3/Robo receptor. Neuron, 32, 25-38.
23. Heit, B., Tavener, S., Raharjo, E., & Kubes, P. (2002). An intracellular signaling hierarchy determines direction of migration in opposing chemotactic gradients. J. Cell Biol., 159, 91-102.
24. Hentschel, H. G., & van Ooyen, A. (1999). Models of axon guidance and bundling during development. Proc. Biol. Sci., 266, 2231-2238.
25. Jin, T., Zhang, N., Long, Y., Parent, C. A., & Devreotes, P. N. (2000). Localization of the G protein betagamma complex in living cells during chemotaxis. Science, 287, 1034-1036.
26. Kimmel, J. M., Salter, R. M., & Thomas, P. J. (2007). An information theoretic framework for eukaryotic gradient sensing. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, &T. Hoffman (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 19 (pp. 705-712). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A. (2004). The Bayesian brain: The role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci., 27, 712-719.
28. Kohout, T. A., & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2003). Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases and arrestins during receptor desensitization. Mol. Pharmacol., 63, 9-18.
29. Kording, K. (2007). Decision theory: What "should" the nervous system do? Science, 318, 606-610.
30. Kording, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427, 244-247.
31. Lauffenburger, D. A. (1982). Influence of external concentration fluctuations on leukocyte chemotactic orientation. Cell Biophys., 4, 177-209.
32. Lauffenburger, D. A., & Linderman, J. J. (1996). Receptors: Models for binding, trafficking and signaling. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Levchenko, A., & Iglesias, P. A. (2002). Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: Application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophys. J., 82, 50-63.
34. Levine, H., Kessler, D. A., & Rappel, W. J. (2004). Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: A balanced inactivation model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 8951-8956.
35. Lowery, L. A., & van Vactor, D. (2009). The trip of the tip: Understanding the growth cone machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 332-343.
36. McLaughlin, T., & O'Leary, D. D. M. (2005). Molecular gradients and development of retinotopic maps. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 28, 327-355.
37. Mortimer, D., Dayan, P., Burrage, K., & Goodhill, G. J.(2009). Optimizing chemotaxis by measuring unbound-bound transitions. Physica D, 239, 477-484.
38. Mortimer, D., Feldner, J., Vaughan, T., Vetter, I., Pujic, Z., Rosoff, W. J., et al. (2009). A Bayesian model predicts the response of axons to molecular gradients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 10296-10301.
39. Mortimer, D., Fothergill, T., Pujic, Z., Richards, L. J., & Goodhill, G. J. (2008). Growth cone chemotaxis. Trends Neurosci., 31, 90-98.
40. Naoki, H., Sakumura, Y., & Ishii, S. (2008). Stochastic control of spontaneous signal generation for gradient sensing in chemotaxis. J. Theor. Biol., 255, 259-266.
41. Narang, A.(2006). Spontaneous polarizationineukaryotic gradient sensing:Amathematical model based on mutual inhibition of frontness and backness pathways. J. Theor. Biol., 240, 538-553.
42. Onsum, M., & Rao, C. V. (2007). A mathematical model for neutrophil gradient sensing and polarization. PLoS Comput. Biol., 3, e36.
43. Parent, C. A., & Devreotes, P. N. (1999). A cell's sense of direction. Science, 284, 765-770.
44. Sakumura, Y., Tsukada, Y., Yamamoto, N., & Ishii, S. (2005). A molecular model for axon guidance based on cross talk between rho GTPases. Biophys. J., 89, 812-822.
45. Samadani, A., Mettetal, J., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2006). Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 11549-11554.
46. Skupsky, R., Losert, W., & Nossal, R. J. (2005). Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing. Biophys. J., 89, 2806-2823.
47. Skupsky, R., McCann, C., Nossal, R., & Losert, W. (2007). Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells. J. Theor. Biol., 247, 242-258.
48. Song, H., & Poo, M.-M. (2001). The cell biology of neuronal navigation. Nat. Cell. Biol., 3, E81-E88.
49. Strong, S. P., Freedman, B., Bialek, W., & Koberle, R. (1998). Adaptation and optimal chemotactic strategy for E. coli. Phys. Rev. E., 57, 4604-4617.
50. Tani, T., Miyamoto, Y., Fujimori, K. E., Taguchi, T., Yanagida, T., Sako, Y., et al. (2005). Trafficking of a ligand-receptor complex on the growth cones as an essential step for the uptake of nerve growth factor at the distal end of the axon: A single-molecule analysis. J. Neurosci., 25, 2181-2191.
51. Tranquillo, R. T., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (1986). Consequences of chemosensory phenomena for leukocyte orientation. Cell Biophys., 8, 1-46.
52. Tranquillo, R. T., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (1987). Stochastic-model of leukocyte chemosensory movement. J. Math. Biol., 25, 229-262.
53. Ueda, M., Sako, Y., Tanaka, T., Devreotes, P., & Yanagida, T. (2001). Single-molecule analysis of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium cells. Science, 294, 864-867.
54. Ueda, M., & Shibata, T. (2007). Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells. Biophys. J., 93, 11-20.
55. van Haastert, P. J. M., & Devreotes, P. N. (2004). Chemotaxis: Signalling the way forward. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 626-634.
56. van Haastert, P. J. M., & Postma, M. (2007). Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. Biophys. J., 93, 1787-1796.
57. Willard, S. S., & Devreotes, P. N. (2006). Signaling pathways mediating chemotaxis in the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. Eur. J. Cell Biol., 85, 897-904.
58. Zigmond, S. H. (1981). Consequences of chemotactic peptide receptor modulation for leukocyte orientation. J. Cell Biol., 88, 644-647.