Simulation of 6-DOF parallel robot for coupling compensation method

Information Technology Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 428-433

  Cong, Ming ^a   Wu, Yingha ^a   Liu, Dong ^a   Du, Yu ^a   Wen, Haiying ^a   Yu, Junfa ^b  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b NO 65053 Army ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Coupling compensation; Inverse kinematics; Parallel robot; Screw theory

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DYNAMIC LOADS; INVERSE KINEMATICS; TANKS (CONTAINERS);

COMPENSATION CONTROL; COMPENSATION METHOD; CONTROL PERFORMANCE; COUPLING VELOCITY; DEGREE OF FREEDOM; PARALLEL ROBOTS; SCREW THEORY; STEADY STATE ERRORS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 78651354269     PISSN: 18125638     EISSN: 18125646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/itj.2011.402.408     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Abdellatif, H. and B. Heimann, 2006. On compensation of passive joint friction in robotic manipulators: Modeling, detection and identi?cation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Computer Aided Control System Design, Oct. 4-6, Munich, pp: 2510-2515.
2. Abdellatif, H., M. Grotjahn and B. Heimann, 2007. Independent identification of friction characteristics for parallel manipulators. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 129: 294-302.
3. Aqel, M.M., 2006. A simulation technique for engineering control systems. J. Applied Sci., 6: 157-162.
4. Cleary, K. and T. Arai, 1991. A prototype parallel manipulator: Kinematics, construction, software, workspace results and singularity analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, April 91, Sacramento, California, pp: 566-571.
5. Eker, I., M. Tumay, T. Kara and M.J. Grimble, 2002. Operation and simulation of a water supply system. J. Applied Sci., 2: 702-709.
6. Huang, Q., H. Jiang, S. Zhang and J. Han, 2005. Spacecraft docking simulation using hardware-in-the-loop simulator with Stewart platform. J. Mech. Eng., 18: 415-418.
7. Iqbal, S., A.I. Bhatti and Q. Ahmed, 2008. Determination of realistic uncertainty bounds for the Stewart platform with pay load dynamics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Sept. 3-5, San Antonio, TX., pp: 995-1000.
8. Li, Q., X. Wang and J. Cheng, 2009. Interference force compensation of Stewart platform based on inverse dynamic model. J. Mech. Eng., 45: 14-19.
9. Liu, S., W.L. Li, Y.C. Du and J. Song, 2009. Dynamic simulation of submarine Stewart platform. J. Harbin Instit. Technol., 41: 249-255.
10. Ma, J., J. He, H. Xiong and J.W. Han, 2008. Simulation of coupling characteristic of hydraulically driven Stewart platform based on dynamics model. Proceeding sof the International Workshop on Modeling, Simulation and Optimization, Dec. 27-28, Hong Kong, pp: 88-92.
11. Meng, Z., R.S. Che, Q.C. Huang and Z.J. Yu, 2002. The direct-error-compensation method of measuring the error of a six-freedom-degree parallel mechanism CMM. J. Mater. Process. Technol, 129: 574-578.
12. Stewart, D., 1993. A platform with six degrees of freedom: A new form of mechanical linkage which enables a platform to move simultaneously in all six degrees of freedom developed by Elliott-Automation. Aircraft Eng. Aerospace Technol., 38: 30-35.
13. Wang, W., H. Xie, X. Fu and H. Yang, 2007. Coupling characteristics of large hydraulic Stewart platform. J. Mech. Eng., 43: 12-15.
14. Yang, C, Q. Huang, H. Jiang, P.O. Ogbobe and J. Han, 2010. PD control with gravity compensation for hydraulic 6-DOF parallel manipulator. Mech. Machine Theory, 45: 666-677.
15. Yang, H.Q., K.D. Zhao, S.L. Wu and J. Cao, 2002. Key technologies and developing state of 6-DOF motion system for flight simulator. J. Syst. Simulation, 14: 84-87.