First comes love, then comes google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating

Communication Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 70-100

  Gibbs, Jennifer L ^a   Ellison, Nicole B ^b   Lai, Chih Hui ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computer mediated communication; online dating; privacy; self disclosure; uncertainty reduction theory; warranting

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650966104     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650210377091     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R.M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy-an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418-430.
2. Altman, I., & Taylor, D.A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3. Antheunis, M.L., Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 100-109.
4. Baker, A.J. (2005). Double click: Romance and commitment among online couples. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
7. Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved September 8, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html.
8. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9. Berger, C.R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
10. Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112.
11. Boon, S.D., & Pasveer, K.A. (1999). Charting the typology of risky relationship experience. Personal Relationships, 6, 317-336.
12. boyd, d., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved October 13, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
13. Bradley, R.V., & Sankar, C.S. (2003). Outcomes assessment: Electronic surveys versus paper-based surveys. Proceedings from the Southeastern Section of the American Society for Engineering Education, Macon, GA.
14. Brunet, P.M., & Schmidt, L.A. (2008). Are shy adults really bolder online? It depends on the context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 707-709.
15. Byron, K., & Baldridge, D.C. (2007). E-Mail recipients' impressions of senders' likability: The interactive effect of nonverbal cues and recipients' personality. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 137-160.
16. Carpenter, S. (2008, December). No recession for online dating sites. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.latimes.com/features/lifestyle/la-ig-dating28-2008dec28,0,1563805.story?page=1.
17. Corcoran, K.J. (1988). The relationship of interpersonal trust to self-disclosure when confidentiality is assured. Journal of Psychology, 122, 193-195.
18. Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Online dating and mating: Perceptions of risk and health among online users. Health, Risk, & Society, 9, 275-294.
19. della Cava, M.R. (2004, April). Truth in advertising hits Internet dating. USA Today. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2004-04-19-web-dating_x.htm.
20. Derlega, V.J., Winstead, B.A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship beginnings (pp. 153-174). New York: Psychology Press.
21. Derlega, V., Winstead, B., Wong, P., & Greenspan, M. (1987). Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 172-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22. Dietz-Uhler, B., Bishop-Clark, C., & Howard, E. (2005). Formation of and adherence to a self-disclosure norm in an online chat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 114-120.
23. Dindia, K. (2000). Sex differences in self-disclosure, reciprocity of self-disclosure, and self-disclosure and liking: Three meta-analyses reviewed. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 21-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved July 17, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html.
25. Donath, J., & boyd, d. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
26. Eastin, M.S. (2005). Teen Internet use: Relating social perceptions and cognitive models to behavior. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 62-75.
27. Eastin, M.S., & LaRose, R. (2005). Alt.support: Modeling social support on-line. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 977-992. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.024.
28. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
29. Ellison, N.B., Gibbs, J.L., & Heino, R.D. (2005, November). Social networks in online dating: The strength of no ties? Paper presented at NCA Convention, Boston, MA.
30. Ellison, N.B., Heino, R.D., & Gibbs, J.L. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-Presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html.
31. Fischler, M. (2007, September). Online dating putting you off? Try a matchmaker. The New York Times. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/fashion/weddings/30FIELD.html.
32. Gibbs, J.L., Ellison, N.B., & Heino, R.D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152-177.
33. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
34. Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
35. Greene, K., Derlega, V.J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409-427). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Griffiths, J.R. (2003). Evaluation of the JISC information environment: Student perceptions of services. Information Research, 8(4). Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://informationr.net/ir/8-4/paper160.html.
37. Griffiths, J.R., & Brophy, P. (2005). Student searching behaviour and the Web: Use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends, 53, 539-554.
38. Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of WPES'05 (pp. 71-80). Alexandria, VA.
39. Hancock, J.T., Toma, C.L., & Fenner, K. (2008). I know something you don't: The use of asymmetric personal information for interpersonal advantage. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 413-416). San Diego, CA.
40. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 371-379.
41. Heino, R.D., Ellison, N.B., & Gibbs, J.L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 427-447.
42. Heisler, J., & Crabill, S. (2006). Who are stinkybug and packerfan4? Email pseudonyms and participants' perceptions of demography, productivity, and personality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1). Retrieved June 20, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue1/heisler.html.
43. Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life: Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendship. New Media & Society, 6, 487-506.
44. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23, 587-605.
45. Joinson, A.N. (2001a). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
46. Joinson, A.N. (2001b). Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in Internet-based surveys. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 587-591.
47. Jourard, S. (1960). Knowing, liking, and the dyadic effect in men's self-disclosure. Merrill Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 6, 178-186.
48. Jung, J.Y., Qiu, J.L., & Kim, Y.C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the divide. Communication Research, 28, 507-535.
49. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50. Levine, D. (2000). Virtual attraction: What rocks your boat? CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 3, 565-573.
51. Ling, S.C., Chuan, L., Yian, T.B.C., Yani, S., & Huaping, C. (2007). Getting to know websites through uncertainty reduction strategies: Which strategies are used more, and which are better? An empirical study of first-time visitors. Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2007 (Article No. 4340726, pp. 3840-3843).
52. Livingstone, S. (2008). Internet literacy: Young people's negotiation of new online opportunities. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected (pp. 101-122). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
53. MacKinnon, D.P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Madden, M., Fox, S., Smith, A., & Vitak, J. (2007). Digital footprints: Online identity management and search in the age of transparency. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Digital_Footprints.pdf.pdf.
55. Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf.pdf.
56. Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y., & Johnson, R.D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9, 126-163.
57. McKenna, K.Y.A. (2008). MySpace or your place: Relationship initiation and development in the wired and wireless world. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 235-247). New York: Psychology Press.
58. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-31.
59. Metzger, M.J. (2007). Communication privacy management in electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2). Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/metzger.html.
60. Morr, M.C., & Petronio, S. (2006). Communication privacy management theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 257-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Paine, C.B., Joinson, A.N., Buchanan, T., & Reips, U-D. (2006). Privacy and self-disclosure online. In Extended Abstracts of CHI 2006 (pp. 1187-1192).
62. Parks, M.R., & Adelman, M.B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55-79.
63. Parks, M.R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80-97.
64. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York: State University of New York Press.
65. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.H. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
66. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.H. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
67. Ramirez, A., & Walther, J.B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication, uncertainty, and information seeking using the Internet. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications (pp. 67-84). New York: Routledge.
68. Ramirez, A., Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
69. Rifon, N.J., LaRose, R., & Choi, S.M. (2005). Your privacy is sealed: Effects of web privacy seals on trust and personal disclosures. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 339-362.
70. Rosen, L.D., Cheever, N.A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2124-2157.
71. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Spitzberg, B.H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4, 71-92.
73. Steel, J.L. (1991). Interpersonal correlates of trust and self-disclosure. Psychological Reports, 68, 1319-1320.
74. Stephure, R.J., Boon, S.D., MacKinnon, S.L., & Deveau, V.L. (2009). Internet initiated relationships: Associations between age and involvement in online dating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 658-681.
75. Stone, A.R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
76. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
77. Tidwell, L.C., & Walther, J.B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348.
78. Toma, C., Hancock, J. & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
79. Tuten, T.L., Urban, D.J., & Bosnjak, M. (2002). Internet surveys and data quality: A review. In B. Batinic, U. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 7-26). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
80. Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-89.
81. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
82. Walther, J.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
83. Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
84. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229-253.
85. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S.T. (2008). The role of friends' behavior on evaluations of individuals' Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
86. Watt, J.H. (1999). Internet systems for evaluation research. In G. Gay & T. L. Bennington (Eds.), Information technologies in evaluation: Social, moral, epistemological, and practical implications (pp. 23-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Weems, G.H. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2001). The impact of midpoint responses and reverse coding on survey data, Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 166-176.
88. Westerman, D.K., Van Der Heide, B., Klein, K.A., & Walther, J.B. (2008). How do people really seek information about others? Information seeking across Internet and traditional communication sources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 751-767.
89. Wheeless, L.R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4, 143-157.
90. Wheeless, L.R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 338-346.
91. Whitty, M. (2008). Revealing the real me, searching for the actual you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707-1723.
92. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271-290.
93. Yurchisin, J., Watchravesringkan, K., & McCabe, D.B. (2005). An exploration of identity re-creation in the context of internet dating. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 735-750.