Modelling student interactions in intelligent learning environments: Constructing bayesian networks from data

International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 733-753

  Mavrikis, Manolis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interaction modelling; machine learning; student modelling

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; INTERACTION MODELLING; MACHINE-LEARNING; STUDENT INTERACTIONS; TECHNIQUES USED;

DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 78650923986     PISSN: 02182130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218213010000406     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Karabenick, S. A. Strategic Help Seeking Implications for Learning and Teaching (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA 1988).
2. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., and Gurtner, J. Motivational tech- niques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors, In Computers as Cognitive Tools, Lajoie, S. P. and Derry, S. J., editors, 75-107 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993).
3. Weiner, B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences, Journal of Edu- cational Psychology 71(1), 3-25 (Warwick & York, 1979).
4. Nelson-LeGall, S. Help-seeking behavior in learning, Review of Research in Education 12, 55-90 (Sage, 1985).
5. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Wagner, A. Z. Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students "game the system", In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, 383-390 (2004).
6. Mavrikis, M. Modelling Students' Behaviour and Affective States in ILEs through Educational Data Mining, PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh (2008).
7. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., and Pain, H. Diagnosing and acting on student affect: the tutor's perspective, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(1), 125-173 (Springer Verlag, 2008).
8. Witten, I. H. and Frank, E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2005), 2nd edition.
9. Han, J. W. and Kamber, M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (Morgan Kauf- mann Pub, 2000).
10. Romero, C. and Ventura, S. Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005, Expert Syst. Appl. 33(1), 135-146 (Pergamon Press, Inc., 2007).
11. Baker, R. and Yacef, K. The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions, Journal of Educational Data Mining 1(1), 3-17 (International Working Group on Educational Data Mining, 2009).
12. Wenger, E. Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge (Morgan Kaufmann Pub, 1987).
13. Self, J. The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring system research: ITSs care, precisely, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 350-364 (IOS Press, 1999).
14. Liu, C. I. Using bayesian networks for student modeling, In Agent-based Tutoring Systems By Cognitive and Affective Modeling, Viccari, R. M., Augustin-Jacques, P., and Verdin, R., editors, 97-113 (IGI Global, 2008).
15. Brusilovsky, P. and Millan, E. User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems, In The Adaptive Web, Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., and Nejdl, W., editors, volume 4321 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3-53 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).
16. Jameson, A. Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5(4), 193-251 (Springer, 1996).
17. Bull, S., Ahmad, N., Johnson, M., Johan, R., Mabbott, A., and Kerly, A. Adaptive navigation support, learner control and open learner models, In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., and Herder, E., editors, volume 5149 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Chapter 33, 275-278 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008).
18. Denaux, R., Dimitrova, V., and Aroyo, L. Integrating Open User Modeling and Learn- ing Content Management for the Semantic Web, volume 3538 (Springer Verlag, 2005).
19. Van Labeke, N., Brna, P., and Morales, R. Opening up the interpretation process in an open learner model, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(3), 305-338 (IOS Press, 2007).
20. Conati, C. Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games, Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 16(7-8), 555-575 (IOS Press, 2002).
21. Reye, J. Two-phase updating of student models based on dynamic belief networks, In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Goettl, B. P., Halff, H. M., Redfield, C. L., and Shute, V. J., editors, volume 1452 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 274-283 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998).
22. Martin, J. and Vanlehn, K. Student assessment using bayesian nets, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42(6), (Elsevier, 1995).
23. VanLehn, K. and Martin, J. Evaluation of an assessment system based on bayesian student modeling, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 179-221 (IOS Press, 1998).
24. Corbett, A. and Anderson, J. Student modeling and mastery learning in a computer- based programming tutor, In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., and McCalla, G., editors, volume 608 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 413-420 (Springer-Verlag, London, 1992).
25. Arroyo, I. and Woolf, B. Inferring learning and attitudes with a bayesian network of log files data, In Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (Proceedings of AIED-2005 Conference, 18-22 July, 2005, Amsterdam), Looi, C. K., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., and Breuker, J., editors, 33-40 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, Holland, 2005).
26. Mayo, M. and Mitrovic, A. Using a probabilistic student model to control problem difficulty, In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutor- ing Systems, volume 1839 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 524-533 (Springer- Verlag, London, 2000).
27. Conati, C., Gertner, A., Vanlehn, K., and Druzdzel, M. On-line student modeling for coached problem solving using bayesian networks, In Proceedings of the Sixth Int. Conference on User Modelling (1997).
28. Collins, J., Greer, J., and Huang, S. Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and bayesian nets, In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelli- gent Tutoring Systems, volume 1086 of Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 569-577 (Springer-Verlag, London, 1996).
29. Bunt, A. and Conati, C. Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13, 269-309 (Springer, Netherlands, 2003).
30. Aleven, V., Mclaren, B., Roll, I., and Koedinger, K. R. Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills, In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 227-239 (2004).
31. Jonsson, A., John, J., Mehranian, H., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Barto, A., Fisher, D., and Mahadevan, S. Evaluating the feasibility of learning student models from data, In AAAI Workshop on Educational Data Mining (2005).
32. Ferguson, K., Arroyo, I., Mahadevan, S., Woolf, B., and Barto, A. Improving intelli- gent tutoring systems: Using expectation maximization to learn student skill levels, In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Hutchison, D., Kanade, T., Kittler, J., Kleinberg, J. M., Mattern, F., Mitchell, J. C., Naor, M., Nierstrasz, O., Pandu Rangan, C., Steffen, B., Sudan, M., Terzopoulos, D., Tygar, D., Vardi, M. Y., Weikum, G., Ikeda, M., Ashley, K. D., and Chan, T.-W., editors, volume 4053 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 453-462 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006).
33. Bouckaert, R. R. Bayesian networks in Weka, Technical report, Computer Science Department, University of Waikato (2004).
34. Verma, T. and Pearl, J. An algorithm for deciding if a set of observed independencies has a causal explanation, In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 323-330 (1992).
35. Blum, A. and Langley, P. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning, Artificial Intelligence 97, 245-271 (Elsevier, 1997).
36. Voulgaris, Z. and Magoulas, G. Discernibility-based approach to feature selection for microarray data, In CD Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of Intelligent Systems (Varna, Bulgaria, 2008).
37. Kohavi, R. and John, G. Wrappers for feature subset selection, Artificial Intelligence 97, 273-324 (Elsevier, 1997).
38. Yu, L. and Huan, L. Feature selection for high-dimensional data: A fast correlation- based filter solution, In International Conference on Machine Learning, 856-863 (Washington DC, 2003).
39. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Wagner, A. Z. Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students "game the system", In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 24-29 April 2004, Vienna, Austria, 383-390 (ACM Press, New York, 2004).
40. Mahalanobis, P. C. On the generalised distance in statistics, In Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, volume 12, 49-55 (1936).
41. Maesschalck, D., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., and Massart, D. L. The mahalanobis distance, In Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, volume 50, 1-18 (2000).
42. Lin, J., Keogh, E., Lonardi, S., and Chiu, B. A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms, In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGMOD workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2-11 (ACM, New York, 2003).
43. Mavrikis, M. and Maciocia, A. WaLLiS: A web-based ILE for science and engineering students studying mathematics, InWorkshop of Advanced Technologies for Mathemat- ics Education in 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia (2003).
44. Adl. Sharable content object reference model. version 1.2: The scorm overview, http://www.adlnet.org (2001).
45. Anderson, J. R. Rules of the mind (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993).
46. Wood, H. Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring, Computers & Education 33(2-3), 153-169 (Elsevier Science Ltd., 1999).
47. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Pelletier, R. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned, Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167-207 (Routledge, 1995).
48. Wood, H. and Wood, D. Help seeking, learning and contigent tutoring, Computers & Education 33, 153-169 (Elsevier, 1999).
49. Aleven, V. and Koedinger, K. R. Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1839, 292-303 (2000).
50. de Baker, R. S. J., Corbett, A. T., Roll, I., and Koedinger, K. R. Developing a general- izable detector of when students game the system, User Modeling and User-Adaptive Interaction 18(3), 287-314 (Springer-Verlag, 2008).
51. Mavrikis, M., Maciocia, A., and Lee, J. Towards predictive modelling of student affect from web-based interactions, In Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work (Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED2007), Luckin, R., Koedinger, K., and Greer, J., editors, volume 158 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Ap- plications, 169-176 (IOS Press, Los Angeles, California, 2007).
52. Baker, R. S. Designing Intelligent Tutors That Adapt to When Students Game the System, PhD thesis, CMU Technical Report CMU-HCII-05-104, Carnegie-Mellon University (2005).