Deliberative democracy and citizenship: In search of the efficacy effect

Journal of Public Deliberation

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Nabatchi, Tina ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizenship; Deliberative Democracy; Political Efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650861501     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Abramson, Paul R. (1983). Political Attitudes in America. Science, 220: 1144-1145.
2. Abramson, Paul R. and John H. Aldrich (1982). The Decline of Electoral Participation in America. The American Political Science Review, 76(3): 502-521.
3. Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Armor, David A. and Shelley E. Taylor (2003). The Effects of Mind-Set on Behavior: Self-Regulation in Deliberative and Implementational Frames of Mind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 86-95.
5. Austin, Erica B. and Bruce E. Pinkleton (1995). Positive and Negative Effects of Political Disaffection on the Less Experienced Voter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 215-235.
6. Balch, George I. (1974). Multiple Indicators of Survey Research: The Concept of "Sense of Political Efficacy." Political Methodology, 1: 1-43.
7. Bandura, Albert (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84: 191-215.
8. Bandura, Albert (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37: 122-47.
9. Bandura, Albert (1994). Self-Efficacy. In: V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4: 71-81. New York, NY: Academic Press.
10. Barber, Benjamin (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Becker, Sascha O. and Andrea Ichino (2002). Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores. Stata Journal, 2(4): 358-377
12. Benhabib, Seyla (1992). Situating the Self: Gender Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
13. Benhabib, Seyla. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In: S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 67-94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Bingham, Lisa B., Tina Nabatchi, Rosemary, O'Leary (2005). The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review, 65(5): 528-539.
15. Blais, André (2000). To Vote or Not To Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
16. Briggs, Derek C. (2004). Causal Inference and the Heckman Model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(4): 397-420.
17. Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
18. Button, Mark and Kevin Mattson (1999). Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation. Polity, 31(4): 609-637.
19. Campbell, Angus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren E. Miller (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
20. Carpella, Joseph N., Vincent Price, and Lilach Nir (2002). Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19: 73-93.
21. Chambers, Simone (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6: 307-326.
22. Clarke, Harold D. and Alan C. Acock (1989). National Elections and Political Attitudes. British Journal of Political Science, 19(4): 551-562.
23. Cohen, Joshua and Archon Fung (2004). Radical Democracy. Swiss Journal of Political Science, 10(4): 23-34.
24. Cohen, Joshua and Joel Rogers (1995). Solidarity, Democracy, Association. In: E.O. Wright (Ed.), Associations and Democracy, 236-267. London-New York: Verso.
25. Converse, Philip E. (1972). Change in the American Electorate. In: A. Campbell and P. E. Converse (Eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, 263-337. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
26. Cook, Fay L. and Lawrence R. Jacobs (1999). Deliberative Democracy in Action: Evaluation of Americans Discuss Social Security. Washington, D.C., Pew Charitable Trust.
27. Cook, Thomas D. and Donald T. Campbell (1979). Quasi-Experimentation Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
28. Cooke, Maeve (2000). Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies, 48: 947-969.
29. Craig, Stephen (1979). Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma. American Politics Quarterly, 7: 225-239.
30. Craig, Stephen C. and Michael A. Maggiotto (1982). Measuring Political Efficacy. Political Methodology, 8: 85-109.
31. Craig, Stephen C., Richard G. Niemi, and Glenn E. Silver (1990). Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior, 12(3): 289-314.
32. Cronbach, Lee J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrica, 16: 297-334.
33. Cunningham, Frank (2002). Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. NY: Routledge.
34. D'Agostino, Ralph B. and Donald B. Rubin (2000). Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95: 749-759.
35. Dalton, Russell (2006). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington: CQ Press.
36. Dehejia Rajeev and Sadek Wahba (1999). Casual Effects in Non-Experimental Studies: Re-Evaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94: 1053-1062.
37. Dehejia, Rajeev and Sadek Wahba (2002). Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1): 151-161.
38. Delli Carpini, Michael X., Fay L. Cook, and Lawrence R. Jacobs (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature, Annual Review of Political Science, 7: 315-344.
39. Delli Carpini, M. and S. Keeter (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Doble, John, Damon Higgins, Jennifer Begasse, and Celeste Fisher (1996). The Public's Capacity for Deliberation: What Can We Learn from NIF? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: John Doble Research Associates.
41. Dowse, Robert E. and John A. Hughes (1972). Political Sociology. New York: John Wiley.
42. Dryzek, John S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Easton, David (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
44. Easton, David (1975). A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5: 435-57.
45. Elster, Jon (1998). Introduction. In: J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy, 1-18. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46. Fearon, James D. (1998). Deliberation as Discussion. In: J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy, 44-68. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47. Finkel, Steven E. (1985). Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4): 891-913.
48. Fishkin, James S. and Robert C. Luskin (1999). Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue. In: M. McCombs and A. Reynolds (Eds.), The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication, 3-38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Frantzich, Stephen E. (2005). Citizen Democracy: Political Activists in a Cynical Age. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
50. Fraser, John (1970). The Mistrustful-Efficacious Hypothesis and Political Participation. Journal of Politics, 32(2): 444-449.
51. Fung, Archon (2001). Accountable Autonomy: Toward Empowered Deliberation in Chicago Schools and Policing. Politics & Society, 29(1): 73-103. (Pubitemid 33584198)
52. Fung, Archon (2003). Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3): 338-367.
53. Fung, Archon (2005). Varieties of Participation in Democratic Governance. Working Paper available at: http://www.archonfung.net/papers/ FungVarietiesOfPart.pdf
54. Fung, Archon and Erik Olin Wright (eds.) (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. New York, NY: Verso.
55. Gastil, John, Eugene P. Deess, and Phil J. Weiser (2002). Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test for the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation. Journal of Politics, 64: 585-595.
56. Gastil, John and James P. Dillard (1999a). The Aims, Methods, and Effects of Deliberative Civic Education through the National Issues Forums. Communication Education, 48: 1-14.
57. Gastil, John and James P. Dillard (1999b). Increasing Political Sophistication through Public Deliberation. Political Communication, 16: 3-23.
58. Gastil, John and Peter Levine (eds.) (2005). The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59. Ginsberg, Benjamin (1982). The Consequences of Consent: Elections, Citizen Control and Popular Acquiescence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
60. Good, I. J. and Lawrence S. Mayer (1975). Estimating the Efficacy of a Vote. Behavioral Science, 20: 25-33.
61. Gurin, Patricia and Orville G. Brim, Jr. (1984). Change in Self In Adulthood: The Example of Sense of Control. In: P. B. Baltes and O. G. Brim Jr. (Eds.), Life-Span Development and Behavior, 282-334.
62. Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
65. Hahn, Jinyong (1998). On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Parametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 66(2): 315-331.
66. Hansen, Kasper M. and Vibeke Normann Andersen (2004). Deliberative Democracy and the Deliberative Poll on the Euro. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27: 261-286.
67. Hawkins, Brett W., Vincent L. Marando, and George A. Taylor (1971). Efficacy, Mistrust and Political Participation: Findings from Additional Data and Indicators. The Journal of Politics, 33(4): 1130-1136.
68. Heckman, James J. (1978). Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equations System. Econometrica, 46: 931-961.
69. Heckman, James J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as Specification Error. Econometrica, 47: 153-161.
70. Heckman, James J. and Richard Robb (1985). Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions. In: J. J. Heckman and B. S. Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, 158-241. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
71. Heckman, James J. and Richard Robb (1986). Alternative Methods for Solving the Problem of Selection Bias in Evaluating the Impact of Treatments on Outcomes. In: H. Wainer (Ed.), Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples, 63-107. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Holt, Lynn (1993). Rationality is Hard Work: An Alternative Interpretation of the Disruptive Effects of Thinking about Reasons. Philosophical Psychology, 6(3): 251-266.
73. Holt, Lynn (1999). Rationality is Still Hard Work: Some Further Notes on the Disruptive Effects of Deliberation. Philosophical Psychology, 12(2): 215-219.
74. Horwitt, Sanford (1999). New Millennium Project: American Youth Attitudes on Politics, Citizenship, Government, and Voting. Lexington, KY: National Association of Secretaries of State.
75. Iyengar, Sheena S. and Mark R. Lepper (2000). When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 995-1006.
76. Kimmelman, D. and G. Hall (1997). A Critical Study of Civic Deliberation and the Political Process. New Brunswick, NJ: Walt Whitman Center Culture of Politics and Democracy, Rutgers University.
77. Kleiman, Michael (1976). Trends in Racial Differences in Political Efficacy: 1952 to 1972. Phylon, 37(2): 159-162.
78. Lane, R. E. (1959). Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. New York: Free Press.
79. Langton, Kenneth P., and David A. Karns (1969). The Relative Influence of the Family, Peer Group, and School in the Development of Political Efficacy. Western Political Quarterly, 22(4), 813-826.
80. Lazer, David, Michael Neblo, Kevin Esterling, and Kathy Goldschmidt (2009). Online Town Meetings: Exploring Democracy in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.
81. Leib, Ethan J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
82. Levinson, Meira (2002). Dilemmas of Deliberative Civic Education. Philosophy of Education. Available online at http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES- Yearbook/2002/262- levinson%2002.pdf
83. Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J. and Steven Brigham (2005). Taking Democracy to Scale - Large Scale Interventions for Citizens. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1): 47-60.
84. Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J., Joe Goldman, Steven Brigham (2005). A Town Meeting for the Twenty-First Century. In: J. Gastil and P. Levine (Eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, 154-163. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
85. Luskin, Robert C. and James S. Fishkin (1998). Deliberative Polling, Public Opinions and Representative Democracy: The Case of the National Issues Convention. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research.
86. Luskin, Robert C. and James S. Fishkin (2003). Deliberation and "Better Citizens". Unpublished research paper from the Center for Deliberative Democracy. Available at: http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/ 2002/bettercitizens.pdf
87. Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Roger Jowell (2002). Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32: 4555-487.
88. Lyons, Schley R. (1970). The Political Socialization of Ghetto Children: Efficacy and Cynicism. The Journal of Politics, 32(2): 288-304.
89. Macedo, Stephen, (Ed.) (1999). Deliberative Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Madsen, Douglas (1978). A Structural Approach to the Explanation of Political Efficacy Levels under Democratic Regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 22: 867-883.
91. Manin, Bernard (1987). On Legitimacy and Public Deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3): 338-68.
92. Mansbridge, Jane (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
93. Mansbridge, Jane (1995). Does Participation Make Better Citizens? Paper presented at the Conference on Citizen Competence and the Design of Democratic Institutions, Committee on the Political Economy of the Good Society. Available at: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/pegs/mansbrid.html
94. Martinussen, Willy (1972).The Development of Civic Competence: Socialization or Task Generalization. Acta Sociologica, 15: 213-227.
95. Mathews, David (1994). Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
96. Michelman, Frank (1988). Law's Republic. Yale Law Journal, 97: 1493-1537.
97. Mill, John Stuart (1997). On Liberty. In: A. Ryan (Ed.), Mill: Texts and Commentaries, 41-132. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
98. Miller, Arthur H. (1974). Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68: 951-972.
99. Miller, David (2000).Citizenship and National Identity. Oxford: Polity Press.
100. Morrell, Michael E. (1998). Broadening Horizons: Can Participation Make Better Citizens? PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University.
101. Morrell, Michael E. (1999). Citizens' Evaluations of Participatory Democratic Procedures: Normative Theory Meets Empirical Science. Political Research Quarterly, 52: 293-322.
102. Morrell, Michael E. (2003). Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67: 589-602.
103. Morrell, Michael E. (2005). Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy. Political Behavior, 27(1): 49-69.
104. Nabatchi, Tina (2010). Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4): 376-399.
105. Neblo, Michael A., Kevin M. Esterling, Ryan P. Kennedy, David Lazer, and Anand E. Sokhey (2009). Who Wants to Deliberate - and Why? HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-027.Available at: [http://web.hks.harvard.edu/ publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=6772].
106. Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
107. Niemi, R. G., S. C. Craig, and F. Mattei (1991). Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4): 1407-1413.
108. Olsen, Marvin E. (1982). Participatory Pluralism. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
109. Orum, Anthony M. (1989). Introduction to Political Sociology: the Social Anatomy of the Body Politic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
110. Pateman, Carole (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
111. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
112. Radcliff, Benjamin and Ed Wingenbach (2000). Preference Aggregation, Functional Pathologies, and Democracy: A Social Choice Defense of Participatory Democracy. The Journal of Politics, 62(4): 977-998.
113. Riker, William H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
114. Riker, William H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
115. Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Donald B. Rubin (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41-55.
116. Rosenbaum, Paul R. and Donald B. Rubin (1984). Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79: 516-524.
117. Skocpol, Theda and Morris P. Fiorina, Eds. (1999). Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
118. Smith, Tom (1999). The Delegates' Experience. In: M. McCombs and A. Reynolds (Eds.), The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication, 39-58. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
119. Stolle, Dietlind and Marc Hooghe (2004). Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debated about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35: 149-167.
120. Sturgis, Patrick, Caroline Roberts, and Nicholas Allum (2005). A Different Take on the Deliberative Poll: Information, Deliberation and Attitude Constraint. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69: 30-65.
121. Sulkin, Tracy and Adam F. Simon (2001). Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting. Political Psychology, 22(4): 809-826.
122. Teixeira, Ruy A. (1992). The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
123. Torres, Lars H. (2003). Deliberative Democracy: A Survey of the Field. Report prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. [Available at: http://www.americaspeaks.org/library/delib-field-report-no-table.pdf]
124. UAC (2006). http://www.unitedagendaforchildren.org/
125. Verba, Sidney and Norman Nie (1972). Participation In America: Social Equality and Political Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
126. Walsh, Katherine C. (2003). The Democratic Potential of Civic Dialogue on Race. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
127. Weissberg, Robert (1975). Political Efficacy and Illusion. Journal of Politics, 37: 469-487.
128. White, Elliott S. (1968). Intelligence and Sense of Political Efficacy in Children. The Journal of Politics, 30(3): 710-731.
129. Williamson, Abigail (2004). Mapping Public Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
130. Wilson, Timothy D. and Jonathan W. Schooler (1991). Thinking Too Much: Introspection can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 181-192.
131. Wilson, Timothy D., Dana Dunn, Delores Kraft, and Douglas J. Lisle (1989). Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude Behavior Consistency: The Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why We Feel The Way We Do. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22: 287-343. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
132. Wright, James (1976). The Dissent of the Governed. New York: Academic Press.
133. Young, Iris Marion (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.