Habermas in the lab: A study of deliberation in an experimental setting

Political Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 809-826

  Sulkin, Tracy ^a   Simon, Adam F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Experiments; Political deliberation; Ultimatum game

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035619657     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.00263     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Baron, D., & Ferejohn, J. (1989). Bargaining in legislatures. American Political Science Review, 83, 1181-1206.
3. Bearden, W. (1999). Handbook of marketing scales. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
4. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Camerer, C., & Thaler, R., (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators, and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209-219.
6. Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy: Jurgen Habermas and the politics of discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17-34). Cambridge: Blackwell.
8. Denver, D., Hands, G., & Jones, B. (1995). Fishkin and the deliberative opinion poll: Lessons from a study of the Granada 500 television program. Political Communication, 12, 147-156.
9. Fishkin, J. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. (1992). Choosing justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Fohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. (1998). Some consequence of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 389-403.
12. Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. (1999). Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication. 16, 3-23.
13. Greenawalt, K. (1989). Speech, crime, and the uses of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Groseclose, T., & Synder, J. (1996). Buying supermajorities. American Political Science Review, 90, 303-315.
15. Gueth, W., & Tietz, R. (1990). Ultimatum bargaining behavior: A survey and comparison of experimental results. Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 417-449.
16. Gutman, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
17. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, trans.). Boston: Beacon.
18. Henry, K. (2000). Perceptions of cooperation in a longitudinal social dilemma. Small Group Research, 31, 507-527.
19. Hibbing, J., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2000, April). Deliberation as a source of system delegitimation and popular disharmony. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
20. Hochschild, J. (1981). What's fair: American beliefs about distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Kagel, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Kim, J., Wyatt, R., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
23. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
24. Luskin, R., & Fishkin, J. (1998, May). Deliberative polling, public opinion, and representative democracy: The case of the National Issues Convention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Louis.
25. Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15, 338-368.
26. Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.
27. Mendelberg, T., & Oleske, J. (2000, April). Race and public deliberation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
28. O'Neill, S. (1997). Impartiality in context: Grounding justice in a pluralist world. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29. Orbell, J., van de Kragt, A., & Dawes, R. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
30. Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1994). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86, 404-417.
31. Page, B. (1996). Who deliberates?: Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Robson, J. (1977). Collected writings of John Stuart Mill (vol. 19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
33. Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347-376.
34. Schauer, F. (1997). Discourse and its discontents. Notre Dame Law Review, 72, 1309-1334.
35. Simon, A., & Sulkin, T. (2000). An experimental assessment of the effects of deliberation in the divide-the-dollar game. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.
36. Sened, I. (1996). A model of coalition formation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Politics, 58, 350-372.
37. Tyler, T., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497.
38. Young, I. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120-135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.