A Novel in vitro method for the detection and characterization of photosensitizers

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Karschuk, Nadine ^a   Tepe, Yeliz ^a   Gerlach, Silke ^a   Pape, Wolfgang ^a   Wenck, Horst ^a   Schmucker, Robert ^a   Wittern, Klaus Peter ^a   Schepky, Andreas ^a   Reuter, Hendrik ^a  

^a BEIERSDORF AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; CD86 ANTIGEN; HLA DR ANTIGEN; PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENT;

ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; DENDRITIC CELL; DOSE RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOTOXICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; LEUKOCYTE ACTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL; PHOTOALLERGY; PHOTOTOXICITY; RADIATION DOSE; ULTRAVIOLET A RADIATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; DERMATITIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HYPERSENSITIVITY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MONOCYTE; MONONUCLEAR CELL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION RESPONSE; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ALLERGENS; ANTIGENS, CD86; CELLS, CULTURED; DENDRITIC CELLS; DERMATITIS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; HYPERSENSITIVITY; LEUKOCYTES, MONONUCLEAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONOCYTES; PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENTS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 78650812263     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015221     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Spielmann H, Balls M, Dupuis J, Pape WJ, Pechovitch G, et al. (1998) The International EU/COLIPA In Vitro Phototoxicity Validation Study: Results of Phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. Toxicology in Vitro 12: 305-327.
2. OECD (2004) OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, no. 432: In Vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
3. Pape WJ, Maurer T, Pfannenbecker U, Steiling W (2001) The red blood cell phototoxicity test (photohaemolysis and haemoglobin oxidation): EU/COLIPA validation programme on phototoxicity (phase II). Altern Lab Anim 29: 145-162.
4. Gould JW, Mercurio MG, Elmets CA (1995) Cutaneous photosensitivity diseases induced by exogenous agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 33: 551-573; quiz 574-556.
5. Pendlington RU, Barratt MD (1990) Molecular basis of photocontact allergy. Int J Cosmet Sci 12: 91-103.
6. Tokura Y (2000) Immune responses to photohaptens: implications for the mechanisms of photosensitivity to exogenous agents. J Dermatol Sci 23(Suppl 1): S6-9.
7. Goossens A (2004) Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 20: 121-125.
8. Stephens TJ, Bergstresser PR (1985) Fundamental Concepts in Photoimmunology and Photoallergy. Journal of Toxicology: Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology 4: 193-218.
9. Schauder S, Schroder W, Geier J (1996) Olaquindox-induced airborne photoallergic contact dermatitis followed by transient or persistent light reactions in 15 pig breeders. Contact Dermatitis 35: 344-354.
10. Mang R, Stege H, Krutmann J (2006) Mechanisms of phototoxic and photoallergic reactions. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. pp 97-103.
11. Toebak MJ, Gibbs S, Bruynzeel DP, Scheper RJ, Rustemeyer T (2009) Dendritic cells: biology of the skin. Contact Dermatitis 60: 2-20.
12. Aeby P, Basketter D, Diembeck W, Eschrich D, Gerberick F, et al. (2006) Dendritic cell research projects. Altex 23 Suppl: 226-228.
13. Casati S, Aeby P, Basketter DA, Cavani A, Gennari A, et al. (2005) Dendritic cells as a tool for the predictive identification of skin sensitisation hazard. Altern Lab Anim 33: 47-62.
14. Basketter D, Maxwell G (2007) In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 26: 359-373.
15. dos Santos GG, Reinders J, Ouwehand K, Rustemeyer T, Scheper RJ, et al. (2009) Progress on the development of human in vitro dendritic cell based assays for assessment of the sensitizing potential of a compound. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 236: 372-382.
16. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A (1994) Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Exp Med 179: 1109-1118.
17. Aiba S, Terunuma A, Manome H, Tagami H (1997) Dendritic cells differently respond to haptens and irritants by their production of cytokines and expression of co-stimulatory molecules. Eur J Immunol 27: 3031-3038.
18. Reuter H, Spieker J, Gerlach S, Engels U, Pape W, et al. (2010) In vitro detection of contact allergens: Development of an optimized protocol using human peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Toxicol In Vitro.
19. Kroon S (1979) Musk Ambrette, a new cosmetic sensitizer and photo sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 5: 337-338.
20. Tokura Y, Nishijima T, Yagi H, Furukawa F, Takigawa M (1996) Photohaptenic properties of fluoroquinolones. Photochem Photobiol 64: 838-844.
21. Timares L, Katiyar SK, Elmets CA (2008) DNA damage, apoptosis and langerhans cells-Activators of UV-induced immune tolerance. Photochem Photobiol 84: 422-436.
22. Mittelbrunn M, Tejedor R, de la Fuente H, Garcia-Lopez MA, Ursa A, et al. (2005) Solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation induces abnormal maturation and defective chemotaxis of dendritic cells. J Invest Dermatol 125: 334-342.
23. Ryan CA, Hulette BC, Gerberick GF (2001) Approaches for the development of cell-based in vitro methods for contact sensitization. Toxicol In Vitro 15: 43-55.
24. Tuschl H, Kovac R, Weber E (2000) The expression of surface markers on dendritic cells as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 14: 541-549.
25. Coutant KD, de Fraissinette AB, Cordier A, Ulrich P (1999) Modulation of the activity of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells by chemical haptens, a metal allergen, and a staphylococcal superantigen. Toxicol Sci 52: 189-198.
26. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA (1990) A predictive mouse ear-swelling model for investigating topical photoallergy. Food Chem Toxicol 28: 361-368.
27. Wojnarowska F, Calnan CD (1986) Contact and photocontact allergy to musk ambrette. Br J Dermatol 114: 667-675.
28. Spielmann H, Liebsch M, Pape WJ, Balls M, Dupuis J, et al. (1995) EEC/ COLIPA in vitro photoirritancy program: results of the first stage of validation. Curr Probl Dermatol 23: 256-264.
29. DeLeo VA, Suarez SM, Maso MJ (1992) Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Results of photopatch testing in New York, 1985 to 1990. Arch Dermatol 128: 1513-1518.
30. Kato S, Seki T, Katsumura Y, Kobayashi T, Komatsu K, et al. (1985) Mechanism for 6-methylcoumarin photoallergenicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 81: 295-301.
31. Hoya M, Hirota M, Suzuki M, Hagino S, Itagaki H, et al. (2009) Development of an in vitro photosensitization assay using human monocyte-derived cells. Toxicol In Vitro 23: 911-918.
32. Allen SK, Todd A, Allen JM (1997) Photochemical formation of singlet molecular oxygen ((1)O2) in illuminated 6-methylcoumarin solutions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 235: 615-618.
33. Buehler EV, Newmann EA, Parker RD (1985) Use of the occlusive patch to evaluate the photosensitive properties of chemicals in guinea-pigs. Food Chem Toxicol 23: 689-694.
34. Hino R, Orimo H, Kabashima K, Atarashi K, Nakanishi M, et al. (2008) Evaluation of photoallergic potential of chemicals using THP-1 cells. J Dermatol Sci 52: 140-143.
35. Bosca F, Miranda MA (1998) Photosensitizing drugs containing the benzophenone chromophore. J Photochem Photobiol B 43: 1-26.
36. Diaz RL, Gardeazabal J, Manrique P, Raton JA, Urrutia I, et al. (2006) Greater allergenicity of topical ketoprofen in contact dermatitis confirmed by use. Contact Dermatitis 54: 239-243.
37. Neumann NJ, Blotz A, Wasinska-Kempka G, Rosenbruch M, Lehmann P, et al. (2005) Evaluation of phototoxic and photoallergic potentials of 13 compounds by different in vitro and in vivo methods. J Photochem Photobiol B 79: 25-34.
38. Dearman RJ, Wright ZM, Basketter DA, Ryan CA, Gerberick GF, et al. (2001) The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 44: 357-361.
39. Placzek M, Fromel W, Eberlein B, Gilbertz KP, Przybilla B (2007) Evaluation of phototoxic properties of fragrances. Acta Derm Venereol 87: 312-316.
40. Rustemeyer T, von Blomberg BM, van Hoogstraten IM, Bruynzeel DP, Scheper RJ (2004) Analysis of effector and regulatory immune reactivity to nickel. Clin Exp Allergy 34: 1458-1466.
41. Schnuch A, Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W (2003) [Decrease in nickel sensitization in young patients-successful intervention through nickel exposure regulation? Results of IVDK, 1992-2001]. Hautarzt 54: 626-632.
42. Forte G, Petrucci F, Bocca B (2008) Metal allergens of growing significance: epidemiology, immunotoxicology, strategies for testing and prevention. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 7: 145-162.
43. Sakaguchi H, Ashikaga T, Miyazawa M, Kosaka N, Ito Y, et al. (2009) The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test-human cell line activation test (h-CLAT). Cell Biol Toxicol 25: 109-126.
44. Scholes EW, Basketter DA, Sarll AE, Kimber I, Evans CD, et al. (1992) The local lymph node assay: results of a final inter-laboratory validation under field conditions. J Appl Toxicol 12: 217-222.
45. Lovell WW, Jones PA (2000) Evaluation of mechanistic in vitro tests for the discrimination of photoallergic and photoirritant potential. Altern Lab Anim 28: 707-724.
46. Palmer RA, White IR (2006) Photopatch testing. In: Frosch PJ, Menné T, Lepoittevin J-P, eds. Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. pp 433-439.
47. Spielmann H, Muller L, Averbeck D, Balls M, Brendler-Schwaab S, et al. (2000) The second ECVAM workshop on phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 42. Altern Lab Anim 28: 777-814.