Two-dimensional structure of team process improvement: Team reflection and team adaptation

Small Group Research

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 32-54

  Wiedow, Annika ^a   Konradt, Udo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

adaptation; reflection; reflexivity; team process improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650794799     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496410377358     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T.N., & Cable, D.M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 219-237.
2. Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S.E., & Barr, S.H. (2002). Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 388-414.
3. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D., & Naquin, C. (2001). Group learning in organizations. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 369-411). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Bliese, P.D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Brislin, R.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & W. Lonner (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Bunderson, S.J., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552-560.
8. Burke, C.S., Salas, E., & Diaz, D. (2008). The role of team learning in facilitating team adaptation within complex environments: Tools and strategies. In V. I. Sessa & M. London (Eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 217-241). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189-1207.
10. Carter, S.M., & West, M.A. (1998). Reflexivity, effectiveness, and mental health in BBC-TV production teams. Small Group Research, 29, 583-601.
11. Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32, 379-405.
12. Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
13. Cuevas, H.M., Fiore, S.M., Salas, E., & Bowers, C.A. (2004). Virtual teams as sociotechnical systems. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies and practice (pp. 1-19). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
14. Daudelin, M.W. (1996). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 36-48.
15. De Dreu, C.K.W. (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 285-298.
16. Edmondson, A.C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
17. Edmondson, A.C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128-146.
18. Edmondson, A.C., Dillon, J.R., & Roloff, K.S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. In A. Brief & J. Walsh (Eds.), The Academy of Management annals (pp. 269-314). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Edwards, J.R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144-192.
20. Ellwart, T., & Konradt, U. (2007). Wissensverteilung und Wissenskoordination in Gruppen: Überprüfung deutschsprachiger Skalen unter computergestützter Gruppenarbeit [Knowledge distribution and knowledge coordination in groups: An examination of German-language scales under computer-assisted teamwork]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51, 128-135.
21. Espinosa, J.A., Lerch, F.J., & Kraut, R.E. (2004). Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drives process and performance (pp. 107-129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
23. Garvin, D. (2000). Learning in action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
24. Graham, M.E., & Cable, D.M. (2001). Consideration of the incomplete block design for policy-capturing research. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 26-45.
25. Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N.K., & Nägele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127-142.
26. Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
28. Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H.G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15, 38-55.
29. Homan, A.C., Schippers, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). Turning the team around: The importance of team reflexivity following poor performance. In Proceedings of the 68th annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Retrieved fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1457368.
30. Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
31. James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
32. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.8) [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
33. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundation and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Karren, R.J., & Woodard Barringer, M. (2002). A review and analysis of the policy-capturing methodology in organizational research: Guidelines for research and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 337-361.
35. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
36. Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Bell, B.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, R. J. Klimoski, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
37. LePine, J.A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27-39.
38. LePine, J.A., Piccolo, R.F., Jackson, C.L., Mathieu, J.E., & Saul, J.R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307.
39. Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587-604.
40. Loo, R. (2002). The caveat on using single-item versus multiple item scales. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 68-75.
41. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
42. Mathieu, J.E., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, R., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
43. Netemeyer, R.G., Johnston, M.W., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 148-157.
44. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
45. Rennie, D.L. (1992). Qualitative analysis of the client's experience of psychotherapy: The unfolding of reflexivity. In S. G. Toukmanian & D. L. Rennie (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches (pp. 211-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Savelsbergh, C.M.J.H., van der Heijden, B.I.J.M., & Poell, R.F. (2009). The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning. Small Group Research, 40, 578-607.
47. Schafer, J.L. (2000). NORM 2.03 for Windows 95/98/NT [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
48. Schippers, M.C., Den Hartog, D.N., & Koopman, P.L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189-211.
49. Schippers, M.C., Den Hartog, D.N., Koopman, P.L., & Wienk, J.A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802.
50. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
51. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Tjosvold, D., Tang, M., & West, M.A. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: The contribution of goal interdependence. Group & Organization Management, 29, 540-559.
53. van Ginkel, W.P., Tindale, R.S., & van Knippenberg, D. (2009). Team reflexivity, development of shared task representations, and the use of distributed information in group decision making. Group Dynamics, 13, 265-280.
54. Wanous, J.P., & Hudy, M.J. (2001). Single item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361-375.
55. Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E., & Hudy, M.J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
56. West, M.A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555-579). Chichester, England: Wiley.
57. West, M.A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In D. A. Johnson & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Vol. 5. Product development teams (pp. 1-29). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.