Structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis OmpATb protein: A model of an oligomeric channel in the mycobacterial cell wall

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 645-661

  Yang, Yinshan ^a,b   Auguin, Daniel ^a,b,c   Delbecq, Stéphane ^d   Dumas, Emilie ^a,b   Molle, Gérard ^a,b   Molle, Virginie ^e   Roumestand, Christian ^a,b   Saint, Nathalie ^a,b  

^a CENTRE DE BIOCHIMIE STRUCTURALE   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

HADDOCK calculation; Membrane protein; NMR structure; Oligomeric assembly; Porin

Indexed keywords

OUTER MEMBRANE PROTEIN A; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHANNEL GATING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; HINGE REGION; KINETOSOME; LIPID BILAYER; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MOLECULAR MODEL; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; OLIGOMERIZATION; PHOSPHOLIPID MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LIPID INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEM;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELL WALL; LIGHT; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PORINS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SCATTERING, RADIATION; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NEGIBACTERIA;

EID: 78650782187     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22912     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, Castro KG, Weyer K. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: the perfect storm. J Infect Dis 2007; 196 ( Suppl 1): S86-S107.
2. Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, Watt CJ, Dye C. Tuberculosis. Lancet 2003; 362: 887-899.
3. Jarlier V, Nikaido H. Mycobacterial cell wall: structure and role in natural resistance to antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1994; 123: 11-18.
4. Brennan PJ, Nikaido H. The envelope of mycobacteria. Annu Rev Biochem 1995; 64: 29-63.
5. Chambers HF, Moreau D, Yajko D, Miick C, Wagner C, Hackbarth C, Kocagoz S, Rosenberg E, Hadley WK, Nikaido H. Can penicillins and other beta-lactam antibiotics be used to treat tuberculosis? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 2620-2624.
6. Daffe M, Draper P. The envelope layers of mycobacteria with reference to their pathogenicity. Adv Microb Physiol 1998; 39: 131-203.
7. Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003; 67: 593-656.
8. Trias J, Jarlier V, Benz R. Porins in the cell wall of mycobacteria. Science 1992; 258: 1479-1481.
9. Riess FG, Dorner U, Schiffler B, Benz R. Study of the properties of a channel-forming protein of the cell wall of the gram-positive bacterium Mycobacterium phlei. J Membr Biol 2001; 182: 147-157.
10. Trias J, Benz R. Permeability of the cell wall of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 1994; 14: 283-290.
11. Lichtinger T, Heym B, Maier E, Eichner H, Cole ST, Benz R. Evidence for a small anion-selective channel in the cell wall of Mycobacterium bovis BCG besides a wide cation-selective pore. FEBS Lett 1999; 454: 349-355.
12. Kartmann B, Stenger S, Niederweis M, Stengler S. Porins in the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol 1999; 181: 6543-6546.
13. Stahl C, Kubetzko S, Kaps I, Seeber S, Engelhardt H, Niederweis M. MspA provides the main hydrophilic pathway through the cell wall of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 2001; 40: 451-464.
14. Faller M, Niederweis M, Schulz GE. The structure of a mycobacterial outer-membrane channel. Science 2004; 303: 1189-1192.
15. Cowan SW, Schirmer T, Rummel G, Steiert M, Ghosh R, Pauptit RA, Jansonius JN, Rosenbusch JP. Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins. Nature 1992; 358: 727-733.
16. Schirmer T, Keller TA, Wang YF, Rosenbusch JP. Structural basis for sugar translocation through maltoporin channels at 3.1 A resolution. Science 1995; 267: 512-514.
17. Basle A, Rummel G, Storici P, Rosenbusch JP, Schirmer T. Crystal structure of osmoporin OmpC from E. coli at 2.0 A. J Mol Biol 2006; 362: 933-942.
18. Niederweis M. Mycobacterial porins-new channel proteins in unique outer membranes. Mol Microbiol 2003; 49: 1167-1177.
19. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE, III, Tekaia F, Badcock K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies R, Devlin K, Feltwell T, Gentles S, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Krogh A, McLean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Osborne J, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rogers J, Rutter S, Seeger K, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Sulston JE, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Barrell BG. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 1998; 393: 537-544.
20. Senaratne RH, Mobasheri H, Papavinasasundaram KG, Jenner P, Lea EJ, Draper P. Expression of a gene for a porin-like protein of the OmpA family from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. J Bacteriol 1998; 180: 3541-3547.
21. Raynaud C, Papavinasasundaram KG, Speight RA, Springer B, Sander P, Bottger EC, Colston MJ, Draper P. The functions of OmpATb, a pore-forming protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol 2002; 46: 191-201.
22. Molle V, Saint N, Campagna S, Kremer L, Lea E, Draper P, Molle G. pH-dependent pore-forming activity of OmpATb from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and characterization of the channel by peptidic dissection. Mol Microbiol 2006; 61: 826-837.
23. Sugawara E, Steiert M, Rouhani S, Nikaido H. Secondary structure of the outer membrane proteins OmpA of Escherichia coli and OprF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 1996; 178: 6067-6069.
24. Alahari A, Saint N, Campagna S, Molle V, Molle G, Kremer L. The N-terminal domain of OmpATb is required for membrane translocation and pore-forming activity in mycobacteria. J Bacteriol 2007; 189: 6351-6358.
25. Teriete P, Yao Y, Kolodzik A, Yu J, Song H, Niederweis M, Marassi FM. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv0899 adopts a mixed alpha/beta-structure and does not form a transmembrane beta-barrel. Biochemistry 2010; 49: 2768-2777.
26. Grizot S, Buchanan SK. Structure of the OmpA-like domain of RmpM from Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol 2004; 51: 1027-1037.
27. Prilipov A, Phale PS, Van Gelder P, Rosenbusch JP, Koebnik R. Coupling site-directed mutagenesis with high-level expression: large scale production of mutant porins from E. coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1998; 163: 65-72.
28. Siroy A, Molle V, Lemaitre-Guillier C, Vallenet D, Pestel-Caron M, Cozzone AJ, Jouenne T, De E. Channel formation by CarO, the carbapenem resistance-associated outer membrane protein of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 4876-4883.
29. Pons JL, Malliavin TE, Delsuc MA. Gifa V.4: a complete package for NMR data set processing. J Biomol NMR 1996; 8: 445-452.
30. Grzesiek S, Bax A. Improved 3D triple-resonance NMR techniques applied to a 31 kDa protein. J Magn Reson 1992; 96: 432-440.
31. Berjanskii MV, Neal S, Wishart DS. PREDITOR: a web server for predicting protein torsion angle restraints. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W63-W69.
32. Guntert P. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol Biol 2004; 278: 353-378.
33. Case DA, Cheatham TE, III, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM, Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1668-1688.
34. Onufriev A, Bashford D, Case DA. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins 2004; 55: 383-394.
35. Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 1996; 8: 477-486.
36. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuthrich K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 1996; 14: 29-32, 51-55.
37. Bhattacharya A, Tejero R, Montelione GT. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia. Proteins 2007; 66: 778-795.
38. Holm L, Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci 1995; 20: 478-480.
39. de Vries SJ, van Dijk M, Bonvin AM. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010; 5: 883-897.
40. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33(Web Server issue): W363-W367.
41. Sani M, Allaoui A, Fusetti F, Oostergetel GT, Keegstra W, Boekema EJ. Structural organization of the needle complex of the type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri. Micron 2007; 38: 291-301.
42. Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G. Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA-a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins 2002; 47: 393-402.
43. Konagurthu AS, Whisstock JC, Stuckey PJ, Lesk AM. MUSTANG: a multiple structural alignment algorithm. Proteins 2006; 64: 559-574.
44. Ye Y, Godzik A. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics 2003; 19 ( Suppl 2): ii246-ii255.
45. Yeats C, Bateman A. The BON domain: a putative membrane-binding domain. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28: 352-355.
46. Holm L, Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 2000; 16: 566-567.
47. Schirmer T. General and specific porins from bacterial outer membranes. J Struct Biol 1998; 121: 101-109.
48. Niederweis M, Ehrt S, Heinz C, Klocker U, Karosi S, Swiderek KM, Riley LW, Benz R. Cloning of the mspA gene encoding a porin from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Mol Microbiol 1999; 33: 933-945.
49. Ziegler K, Benz R, Schulz GE. A putative alpha-helical porin from Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Mol Biol 2008; 379: 482-491.
50. Yip CK, Kimbrough TG, Felise HB, Vuckovic M, Thomas NA, Pfuetzner RA, Frey EA, Finlay BB, Miller SI, Strynadka NC. Structural characterization of the molecular platform for type III secretion system assembly. Nature 2005; 435: 702-707.
51. Spreter T, Yip CK, Sanowar S, Andre I, Kimbrough TG, Vuckovic M, Pfuetzner RA, Deng W, Yu AC, Finlay BB, Baker D, Miller SI, Strynadka NC. A conserved structural motif mediates formation of the periplasmic rings in the type III secretion system. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16: 468-476.
52. Dolinsky TJ, Czodrowski P, Li H, Nielsen JE, Jensen JH, Klebe G, Baker NA. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(Web Server issue): W522-W525.
53. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 10037-10041.
54. de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat Protoc 2010; 5: 883-897.
55. Baker NA. Poisson-Boltzmann methods for biomolecular electrostatics. Methods Enzymol 2004; 383: 94-118.
56. Bond PJ, Faraldo-Gomez JD, Sansom MS. OmpA: a pore or not a pore? Simulation and modeling studies. Biophys J 2002; 83: 763-775.
57. Hong H, Szabo G, Tamm LK. Electrostatic couplings in OmpA ion-channel gating suggest a mechanism for pore opening. Nat Chem Biol 2006; 2: 627-635.
58. Khalid S, Bond PJ, Carpenter T, Sansom MS. OmpA: gating and dynamics via molecular dynamics simulations. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1778: 1871-1880.