Increasing stimulus intensity does not affect sensorimotor synchronization

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-53

  Białuńska, Anita ^a   Bella, Simone Dalla ^a,b   Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

^b International Laboratory for Brain Music and Sound (BRAMS)   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650779277     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0282-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronizations. Brain and Cognition, 48, 66-79.
2. Aschersleben, G., Gehrke, J., & Prinz, W. (2001). Tapping with peripheral nerve block: A role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 331-339.
3. Aschersleben, G., Gehrke, J., & Prinz, W. (2004). A psychophysical approach to action timing. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 117-136). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
4. Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1995). Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(3), 305-317.
5. Aschersleben, G., Stenneken, P., Cole, J., & Prinz, W. (2002). Timing mechanisms in sensorimotor synchronization. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 227-244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bays, P. M., Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2005). Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event-driven. Current Biology, 15, 1125-1128.
7. Billon, M., Semjen, A., Cole, J., & Gauthier, G. (1996). The role of sensory information in the production of periodic finger-tapping sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 110, 243-251.
8. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 635-640.
9. Cardoso-Leite, P., Gorea, A., & Mamassian, P. (2007). Temporal-order judgment and simple reaction times: Evidence for a common processing system. Journal of Vision, 7(6), 1-14.
10. Dunlap, K. (1910). Reactions on rhythmic stimuli, with attempt to synchronize. Psychological Review, 17, 399-416.
11. Fraisse, P. (1980). Les synchronisations sensori-motrices aux rythmes (Sensorimotor synchronizations to rhythms). In J. Requin (Ed.), Anticipation et comportement (pp. 233-257). Paris: Centre National.
12. Gehrke, J. (1995). Sensorimotor synchronization: The intensity of afferent feedback affects the timing of movements (paper 15/95). Munich: Max Planck Institut for Psychological Research.
13. Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2008). Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 471-479.
14. Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1985). Temporal tracking and synchronizationstrategies. Human Neurobiology, 4, 73-77.
15. Jaśkowski, P. (1992). Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli. Psychological Research, 54, 141-145.
16. Jaśkowski, P. (1996). Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: Dissociations and hypotheses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 707-730.
17. Jaśkowski, P. (1999). Reaction time and temporal-order judgment as measures of perceptual latency: The problem of dissociations. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spacial and temporal events (pp. 265-283). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., & Jaroszyk, F. (1994). On the relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time and stimulus intensity. Psychological Research, 56, 59-65.
19. Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Wauschkuhn, B., Wascher, E., & Verleger, R. (2000). The influence of time pressure and cue validity on response force in an S1-S2 paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 105, 89-105.
20. Jaśkowski, P., & Verleger, R. (1993). A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 163-174.
21. Jaśkowski, P., & Włodarczyk, D. (2006). Task modulation of the effect of brightness on reaction time and response force. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 98-112.
22. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Kolers, P. A., & Brewster, J. M. (1985). Rhythms and responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 11, 150-167.
24. Large, E. W. (2008). Resonating to musical rhythm: Theory and experiment. In S. Grondin (Ed.), The psychology of time. Bingley: Emerald.
25. Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How we track time varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119-159.
26. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Lütkenhöner, B., Krumbholz, K., Lammertmann, C., Seither-Preisler, A., Steinsträter, O., & Patterson, R. D. (2003). Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage, 18, 58-66.
28. Mates, J. (1994a). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence: I. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics, 70, 463-473.
29. Mates, J. (1994b). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence: II Stability analysis, error estimation and simulations. Biological Cybernetics, 70, 475-484.
30. Mates, J., & Aschersleben, G. (2000). Sensorimotor synchronization: The impact of temporally displaced auditory feedback. Acta Psychologica, 104, 29-44.
31. Mates, J., Radil, T., & Pöppel, E. (1992). Cooperative tapping: Time control under different feedback conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 691-704.
32. Menendez, A., Lit, A. (1983). Effects of test-flash and steady background luminance on simple visual reaction time (RT) and perceived simultaneity (PC) (Abstract). Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science, 24(Suppl), 95.
33. Michon, J. A. (1967). Timing in temporal tracking. Assen: van Gorcum.
34. Miller, J. O., & Schwartz, W. (2006). Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: A diffusion model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 2, 394-412.
35. Miller, J. O., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (1999). Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1454-1471.
36. Mordkoff, J. T., Miller, J. O., & Roch, A. C. (1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 22, 25-41.
37. Neumann, O., Esselmann, U., & Klotz, W. (1993). Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment. Psychological Research, 56, 26-34.
38. Neumann, O., & Niepel, M. (2004). Timing of perception and perception of time. In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophys-ics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 245-269). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
39. Paillard, J. (1948). Quelques données psychophysiologiques relatives au déclenchement de la commande motrice (Some psychophysiological data relating to the triggering of motor commands). L'Année Psychologique, 47-48, 28-47.
40. Repp, B. H. (2000). Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization. Psychological Research, 63, 106-128.
41. Repp, B. H. (2003). Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: The synchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 355-370.
42. Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 969-992.
43. Repp, B. H., & Doggett, R. (2007). Tapping to a very slow beat: A comparison of musicians and non-musicians. Music Perception, 24, 367-376.
44. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Towards a psychophysics of agency: Detecting gain and loss of control over auditory action effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 469-482.
45. Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2004). Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychological Research, 68, 252-270.
46. Roufs, J. A. J. (1974). Dynamic properties of vision: V Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 14, 853-869.
47. Sanford, A. J. (1971). Effects of changes in the intensity of white noise on simultaneity judgements and simple reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 23(A), 296-303.
48. Sanford, A. J. (1974). Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 443-446.
49. Spencer, R., Zelaznik, H. N., Diedrichsen, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science, 300, 1437-1439.
50. Stenneken, P., Aschersleben, G., Cole, J., & Prinz, W. (2002). Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects. Psychological Research, 66, 40-49.
51. Thaut, M. H., Miller, R. A., & Schauer, L. M. (1998). Multiple synchronization strategies in rhythmic sensorimotor tasks: Phase vs. period correction. Biological Cybernetics, 79, 241-250.
52. Vaughan, J., Mattson, T. R., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (1998). The regulation of contact in rhythmic tapping. In D. A. Rosenbaum & C. E. Collyer (Eds.), Timing of behavior: neural, computational, and psychological perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53. Vorberg, D., & Wing, A. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action 2 (pp. 181-262). London: Academic Press.
54. Vos, P. G., Mates, J., & van Kruysbergen, N. W. (1995). The perceptual centre of a stimulus as the cue for synchronization to a metronome: Evidence from asynchronies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A(4), 1024-1040.
55. Waszak, F., & Gorea, A. (2004). A new look on the relation between perceptual and motor responses. Visual Cognition, 11, 947-963.