Task modulation of the effects of brightness on reaction time and response force

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 98-112

  Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a   Włodarczyk, Dariusz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT   (Poland)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Reaction time; Response force; Stimulus intensity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRIGHTNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SIZE PERCEPTION; STATISTICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 33745336222     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Angel A. Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. The The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1973) 193-200
2. Azorin J.M., Benhaim P., Hasbroucq T., and Passamd' C.A. Stimulus preprocessing and response selection in depression: a reaction time study. Acta Psychologica 89 (1995) 95-100
3. Barry R.J., and James A.L. Fractionation of phasic responses in dishabituation paradigm. Physiology & Behavior 26 (1981) 69-75
4. Bertelson P. The time-course of preparation: confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signal. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 145-154
5. Egeth H.E. Attention and preattention. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (1977), Academic Press, New York 277-320
6. Everett B.L., Hochhaus L., and Brown J.R. Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice. Perception & Psychophysics 37 (1985) 467-470
7. Jaśkowski P. Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: dissociations and hypotheses. Perceptual and Motor Skills 82 (1996) 707-730
8. Jaśkowski P. Reaction time and temporal order judgment: the problem of dissociations. In: Aschersleben G., Bachmann T., and Müsseler J. (Eds). Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (1999), Elsevier, Amsterdam 265-287
9. Jaśkowski P., and Wl{bar}odarczyk D. Effect of sleep deficit, knowledge of results, and stimulus quality on reaction time and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills 84 (1997) 563-572
10. Jaśkowski P., Pruszewicz A., and Swidziński P. VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution. Psychological Research 52 (1990) 28-34
11. Jaśkowski P., Rybarczyk K., and Jaroszyk F. On the relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time and stimulus intensity. Psychological Research 56 (1994) 59-65
12. Jaśkowski P., Verleger R., and Wascher E. Response force and reaction time in a simple reaction task under time pressure. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 202 (1994) 405-413
13. Jaśkowski P., Wróblewski M., and Hojan-Jezierska D. Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79 (1994) 995-1002
14. Jaśkowski P., Rybarczyk K., Jaroszyk F., and Lemański D. The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 55 (1995) 57-64
15. Jaśkowski P., Wauschkuhn B., Van der Lubbe R.H.J., Wascher E., and Verleger R. The influence of time pressure and expectancy on response force in an S1-S2 paradigm. Acta Psychologica 105 (2000) 89-105
16. Jaśkowski P., Werner I., and Verleger R. On the translation of some stimulus features to response force. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 63 (2003) 327-335
17. Kammer T., Lehr L., and Kirschfeld K. Cortical visual processing is temporally dispersed by luminance in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters 263 (1999) 133-136
18. Kaswan J., and Young S. Effect of luminance, exposure duration and task complexity on reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1965) 393-400
19. Keuss P.J.G., and van der Molen M.W. Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction time tasks: further studies on immediate arousal. Acta Psychologica 52 (1982) 61-72
20. Mansfield R.J.W. Brightness function: effect of area and duration. Journal of the Optical Society of America 63 (1973) 913-920
21. Mattes S., Ulrich R., and Miller J.O. Effects of response probability on response force in simple RT. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A (1997) 405-420
22. Mattes S., Ulrich R., and Miller J. Response force in RT tasks: isolating effects of stimulus probability and response probability. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 451-477
23. Meyer D.E., Osman A., Irwin D.E., and Yantis S. Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology 26 (1988) 3-67
24. Miller J., Ulrich R., and Pfaff K. Visual Stimulus Intensity Does Not Influence Response Force 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society: San Francisco, CA (1991)
25. Miller J., Franz V., and Ulrich R. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 107-119
26. Miller J., Ulrich R., and Rinkenauer G. Effects of stimulus intensity on the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1454-1471
27. Näätänen R. Non-aging fore-period and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica 35 (1971) 316-327
28. Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear and Hearing 16 (1995) 6-18
29. Niemi P. Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes. Acta Psychologica 43 (1979) 299-312
30. Niemi P., and Lehtonen E. Foreperiod and visual stimulus: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica 50 (1982) 73-82
31. Niemi P., and Näätänen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 89 (1981) 133-162
32. Osman A., Lou L., Muller-Gethmann H., Rinkenauer G., Mattes S., and Ulrich R. Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes. Biological Psychology 51 (2000) 173-199
33. Payne W.H. Reaction time as a function of retinal location. Vision Research 6 (1966) 729-732
34. Payne W.H. Visual reaction time on a circle about the fovea. Science 155 (1967) 481-482
35. Pins D., and Bonnet C. On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Pieron's law and choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 390-400
36. Rains J.D. Signal luminance and position effects in human reactions time. Vision Research 3 (1963) 239-251
37. Rinkenauer G., Osman A., Ulrich R., and Mattes S. On the locus of speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 133 (2004) 261-282
38. Sanders A.F. The foreperiod effect revisited. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 27 (1975) 591-598
39. Sanders A.F. Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In: Dornic S. (Ed). Attention and Performance (1977), Erlbaum, Hilsdale, NJ 3-25
40. Sanders A.F. Stage analysis of reaction processes. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in Motor Behavior (1980), North-Holland, Amsterdam 331-354
41. Sanders A.F. Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica 53 (1983) 61-97
42. Sanders A.F., and Wertheim M. The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1973) 201-206
43. Schwarz S., Pomerantz J.R., and Egeth H.E. State and process limitations in information processing: an additive factors analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 403-410
44. Schweickert R., Dahn C., and McGuigan H. Intensity and number of alternatives in hue identification: Pieron's law and choice reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics 44 (1988) 383-389
45. Stanovitch K.E., and Pachella R.G. Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility, and stages of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 411-421
46. Ulrich R., Rinkenauer G., and Miller J.O. Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 915-928
47. Ulrich R., Mattes S., and Miller J. Donder's assumption of pure insertion: an evaluation on the basis of response dynamics. Acta Psychologica 102 (1999) 43-75
48. Van den Heuvel C.E., Van Galen G.P., Teulings H.-L., and Van Gemmert A. Axial pen force increases with processing demands in handwriting. Acta Psychologica 102 (1998) 43-75
49. Van der Lubbe R.H.J., Jaśkowski P., Wauschkuhn B., and Verleger R. Influence of time pressure in a simple detection task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology 15 (2001) 241-255
50. van der Molen M.W., and Keuss P.J.G. The relationship between reaction time and intensity in discrete auditory tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (1979) 95-102
51. van der Molen M.W., and Keuss P.J.G. Response selection and the processing of auditory intensity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (1981) 177-184
52. van der Molen M.W., and Orlebeke J.F. Phasic heart rate change and the U-shaped relationship between choice reaction time and auditory signal intensity. Psychophysiology 17 (1980) 471-481
53. Van Duren L.L., and Sanders A.F. On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica 69 (1988) 83-94
54. Van Galen G.P., and de Jong W.P. Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control. Human Movement Science 14 (1995) 539-571
55. Van Galen G.P., and van Huygevoort M. Error, stress and the role of neuromotor noise in space oriented behaviour. Biological Psychology 51 (2000) 151-171
56. Van Gemmert A.W.A., and Van Galen G.P. Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1299-1313
57. Vaughan Jr. H.G., Costa L.D., and Gilden I. The functional relation of visual response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research 6 (1966) 645-656
58. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1988) 343-356
59. Verleger R. Towards an integration of P3 research with cognitive neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1998) 150-154
60. Wilson A.J., and Lit A. Effects of photopic annulus luminance level on reaction time and on the latency of evoked cortical potential responses to target flashes. Journal of the Optical Society of America 71 (1981) 1481-1486
61. Wl{bar}odarczyk D., Jaśkowski P., and Nowik A. The influence of sleep deprivation and auditory intensity on reaction time and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills 94 (2002) 1101-1112