The influence of time pressure and cue validity on response force in an S1-S2 paradigm

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-105

  Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a,b   Van Der Lubbe, Rob H J ^a   Wauschkuhn, Bernd ^a   Wascher, Edmund ^c   Verleger, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cue validity; Response force; S1 S2 paradigm; Time pressure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AROUSAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034267008     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00046-9     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry beyond reaction time. Psychological Science, 2, 153-157.
2. Angel, A. (1973). Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 171-181.
3. Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1278-1291.
4. Giray, M. (1990). Über die Aktivierung der menschlichen Motorik: theoretische und experimentelle Analysen bei Reaktionsaufgaben. On the activation of the human motor system: theoretical and experimental analyses of response tasks. Doctoral dissertation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen.
5. Jaśkowski, P., & Verleger, R. (1993). A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 163-174.
6. Jaśkowski, P., & Wtodarczyk, D. (1997). Effect of sleep deficit knowledge of results and stimulus quality on reaction time and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 563-572.
7. Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., & Lemański, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in human. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 55, 57-64.
8. Jaśkowski, P., Verleger, R., & Wascher, E. (1994a). Response force and reaction time in simple reaction task under time pressure. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202, 405-413.
9. Jaśkowski, P., Wróblewski, M., & Hojan-Jezierska, D. (1994b). Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 995-1002.
10. Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1089-1097.
11. Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1997). Effects of response probability on response force in simple RT. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50 A, 405-420.
12. Miller, J., Franz, V., & Ulrich, R. (1999). Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple go-no-go and choice RT tasks. Perception and Psychopysics, 61, 107-119.
13. Näätänen, R. (1971). Non-aging fore-period and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 35, 316-327.
14. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 133-162.
15. Niemi, P., & Lethonen, E. (1982). Foreperiod and visual stimulus intensity: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 50, 73-81.
16. Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. Kantowitz, Human information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
18. Sanders, A. F. (1975). The foreperiod effect revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 591-598.
19. Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61-97.
20. Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49 A, 972-990.
21. Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 915-928.
22. Ulrich, R., Mattes, S., & Miller, J. (1999). Donders' assumption of pure insertion: an evaluation on the basis of response dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 102, 43-75.
23. Van den Heuvel, C. E., Van Galen, G. P., Teulings, H.-L., & Van Gemmert, A. (1998). Axial pen force increases with processing demands in handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 100, 145-159.
24. Van Galen, G. P., & De Jong, W. P. (1995). Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control. Human Movement Science, 14, 539-571.
25. Van Gemmert, A. W. A., & Van Galen, (1997). Stress neuromotor noise and human performance A theoretical perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1299-1313.
26. Włodarczyk, D., Jaśkowski, P. (submitted). The influence of sleep deprivation and loudness on reaction time and response force for tasks varying in complexity.