Poststorage sensory profiles of fruit of five apple cultivars harvested at different maturity stages

Journal of Food Quality

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-17

  Zerbini, Paola Eccher ^a   Pianezzola, Alberto ^a   Grassi, Maurizio ^a  

^a Ist Sperim Per Valorizzazione T   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 0033238579     PISSN: 01469428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1999.tb00922.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. COSTA, G., BELTRAME, E., ECCHER ZERBINI, P. and PIANEZZOLA, A. 1996. High density orchard productivity and fruit quality. International Symposium on Integrating Canopy, Rootstock and Environmental Physiology in Orchards Systems, Wenatchee, Wash. and Penticton, B.C., Canada, July. Acta Horticulturae, n. 451.
2. DE JAGER, A., JOHNSON, D. and HOHN, E. (Editors) 1996. Determination and Prediction of Optimum Harvest Date of Apples and Pears, 171 pp., European Commission COST 94, Luxembourg.
3. DE JAGER, A. and ROELOFS, F. 1996. Prediction of optimum harvest date of Jonagold. In Determination and Prediction of Optimum Harvest Date of Apples and Pears (A. De Jager, D. Johnson and E. Hohn, eds.) pp. 21-31, European Commission COST 94, Luxembourg.
4. ECCHER ZERBINI, P., GORINI, F., POLESELLO, A. (Editors) 1991. Measurement of the Quality of Tomatoes: Recommendations of an EEC Working Group, pp. 15-16, I.V.T.P.A, Milano.
5. JELLINEK, G. 1985. Sensory Evaluation of Food, pp. 111-143, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England.
6. KNEE, M. and SMITH, S.M. 1989. Variation in quality of apple fruits stored after harvest on different dates. J. Hort. Science. 64, 413-419.
7. MACFIE, H. 1995. Consumer preference and sensory studies on southern and northern hemisphere dessert apples. European Apple 3, 12-13.
8. MARTENS, H., WOLD, S. and MARTENS, M. 1982. A layman's guide to multivariate data analysis. In Food Research and Data Analysis, (H. Martens and H. Russwurm, Jr., eds.) pp. 473-492, Applied Science Publishers, London.
9. MASSART, D.L., VANDEGINSTE, B.G.M., DEMING, S.N., MICHOTTE, Y. and KAUFMAN, L. 1988. Chemometrics: A Textbook, pp. 351-352, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
10. MEILGAARD, M., VANCE CIVILLE, G. and CARR, B.T. 1987. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, pp. 6-7, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.
11. O'MAHONY, M. 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food, pp. 332-337, M. Dekker, Inc., New York.
12. POWERS, J.J. 1984. Using general statistical programs to evaluate sensory data. Food Technol. 6, 74-84.
13. SAS 1988. SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 6.03, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
14. SEKSE, L. 1990. Influence of harvest time on quality loss during storage of apples. In Abstracts of XXIII International Horticultural Congress, no 3305, Aug. 27-Sept. 1, Firenze, Italy.
15. SNEDECOR, G.W. and COCHRAN, W.G. 1967. Statistical Methods, p. 327, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
16. WATKINS, C.B., BROOKFIELD, P.L. and HARKER, F.R. 1993. Development of maturity indices for the "Fuji" apple cultivar in relation to watercore incidence. Acta Horticulturae, 326, 267-275.
17. WOLTERS, C.J. and VAN GEMERT L.J. 1990. Towards an integrated model of sensory attributes, instrumental data and consumer perception of tomatoes. Part I. Relation between consumer perception and sensory attributes. Acta Horticulturae 259, 91-106.