Crispness and crunchiness judgment of apples based on contact acoustic emission

Journal of Texture Studies

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 75-91

  Zdunek, Artur ^a   Konopacka, Dorota ^b   Jesionkowska, Katarzyna ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF AGROPHYSICS   (Poland)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POMOLOGY AND FLORICULTURE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Acoustic emission; Apple; Crispness; Crunchiness; Puncture

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 75749097737     PISSN: 00224901     EISSN: 17454603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2009.00214.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BEN-ARIE, R. KISLEV, N. 1979. Ultrastructural changes in the cell wall of ripening apple and pear fruit. Plant Physiol. 64, 197 202.
2. BOURNE, M.C. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, London.
3. CHEN, J., KARLSSON, C. POVEY, M. 2005. Acoustic envelope detector for crispness assessment of biscuits. J. Texture Studies 36, 139 156.
4. CHRISTENSEN, C.M. VICKERS, Z.M. 1981. Relationships of chewing sounds to judgments of food crispness. J. Food Sci. 46, 574 578.
5. DE BELIE, N., DE SMEDT, V. DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. 2000. Principal component analysis of chewing sounds to detect differences in apple crispness. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 18 (2 109 119.
6. DE BELIE, N., HARKER, F.R. DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. 2002. Crispness judgement of royal gala apples based on chewing sounds. Biosyst. Eng. 81 (3 297 303.
7. DE SMEDT, V., PAUWELS, E., DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. NICOLAI, B. 1998. Microscopic observation of mealiness in apples: A quantitative approach. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 14, 151 158.
8. DRAKE, B.K. 1963. Food crushing sounds. An introductory study. J. Food Sci. 28, 233 241.
9. DRAKE, B.K. 1965. Food crushing sounds: Comparisons of objective and subjective data. J. Food Sci. 30, 556 559.
10. DUIZER, L 2001. A review of acoustic research for studying the sensory perception of crisp, crunchy and crackly textures. Food Sci. Technol. 12, 17 24.
11. EDMINSTER, J.A. VICKERS, Z.M. 1985. Instrumental acoustical measures of crispness in food. J. Texture Studies 16, 153 167.
12. FILLION, L. KILCAST, D. 2000. Concept and measurements of freshness of fruits and vegetables. Leatherhead Food RA Research Reports No. 770.
13. FILLION, L. KILCAST, D. 2002. Consumer perception of crispness and crunchiness in fruits and vegetables. Food Qual. Prefer. 13, 23 29.
14. GONDEK, E., LEWICKI, P.P. RANACHOWSKI, Z. 2006. Influence of water activity on the acoustic properties of breakfast cereals. J. Texture Studies 37, 497 515.
15. HARKER, F.R., MAINDONALD, J., MURRAY, S.H., GUNSON, F.A., HALLETT, I.C. WALKER, S.B. 2002. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: Texture of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24, 225 239.
16. KONOPACKA, D. PLOCHARSKI, W.J. 2004. Effect of storage conditions on the relationship between apple firmness and texture acceptability. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32, 205 211.
17. LIN, T.T. PITT, R.E. 1986. Rheology of apple and potato tissue as affected by cell turgor pressure. J. Texture Studies 17, 291 313.
18. LUYTEN, H. VAN VLIET, T. 2006. Acoustic emission, fracture behaviour and morphology of dry crispy foods: A discussion article. J. Texture Studies 37, 221 240.
19. LUYTEN, H., PLIJTER, J.J. VAN VLIET, T. 2004. Crispy/crunchy crusts of cellular solid foods: A literature review with discussion. J. Texture Studies 35, 445 492.
20. MAGNESS, J.R. TAYLOR, G.F. 1925. An improved type of pressure tester for the determination of fruit maturity. USDA Cir. No. 350.
21. MOHSENIN, N.N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials, 2nd Ed., Gordon and Breach Science Publ., New York, NY.
22. NIKLAS, K.J. 1992. Plant Biomechanics, an Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function, The University Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
23. PIERZYNOWSKA-KORNIAK, G., ZADERNOWSKI, R., FORNAL, J. NESTEROWICZ, J. 2002. The microstructure of selected apple varieties. EJPAU Food Sci. Technol. 5 (2). http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue2/food/art-13.html (accessed December 10, 2009).
24. REEVE, R.M. 1970. Relationship of histological structure to texture of fresh processed fruit and vegetables. J. Texture Studies 1, 247.
25. SZCZESNIAK, A.S. 1988. The meaning of textural characteristics-crispness. J. Texture Studies 19, 51 59.
26. SZCZESNIAK, A.S. KHAN, E.L. 1984. Texture contrasts and combinations: A valued consumer attribute. J. Texture Studies 15, 285 301.
27. VARELA, P., CHEN, J., FISZMAN, S. POVEY, M.J.W. 2006. Crispness assessment of roasted almonds by an integrated approach to texture description: Texture, acoustic, sensory and structure. J. Chemom. 20, 311 320.
28. VICKERS, Z.M. 1983. Crackliness: Relationships of auditory judgments to tactile judgments and instrumental acoustical measurements. J. Texture Studies 15, 49 58.
29. VICKERS, Z.M. 1987. Sensory acoustical and force-deformation measurements of potato chips crispness. J. Food sci. 52, 138 140.
30. VICKERS, Z.M. BOURNE, M.C. 1976. A psychoacoustical theory of crispness. J. Food Sci. 41, 1158 1164.
31. VINCENT, J.F.V. 1998. The quantification of crispness. J. Sci. Food Agric. 78, 162 168.
32. VINCENT, J.F.V. 2004. Application of fracture mechanics to the texture of food. Eng. Fail. Anal. 11, 695 704.
33. ZDUNEK, A. BEDNARCZYK, J. 2006. Effect of mannitol treatment on ultrasound emission during texture profile analysis of potato and apple tissue. J. Texture Studies 37, 339 359.
34. ZDUNEK, A. KONSTANKIEWICZ, K. 2004. Acoustic emission in investigation of plant tissue micro-cracking. Trans. ASAE 47 (4 1171 1177.
35. ZDUNEK, A. RANACHOWSKI, Z. 2006. Acoustic emission in puncture test of apples during shelf-life. EJPAU Agric. Eng. 9 (4 http://www.ejpau.media.pl/ volume9/issue4/art-30.html (accessed December 10, 2009).