What do we know? How do we know it? An idiosyncratic readers' Guide to philosophies of engineering education

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Smith, Karl A ^a   Korte, Russell F ^b   Adams, Robin ^c   Evangelou, Demetra ^c   Matusovich, Holly ^c   Pawley, Alice ^c   Streveler, Ruth ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Epistemology; Ontology; Philosophy of engineering education

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHIES; EPISTEMOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION; THEORY AND PRACTICES;

ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 78650759725     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720572     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.
2. th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.
3. Van do Ven, A. Engaged scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, 2007.
4. Nelson, H. G. and Stolterman, E. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Educational Technology Publications, 2003.
5. Koen, B. V. Discussion of the method. Oxford University Press, 2003.
6. Rowland, G. "Shall we dance? A design epistemology for organizational learning and performance." Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 2004, 33-48.
7. Perkins, D. N. Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum, 1986.
8. Korte, R., Sheppard, S. and Jordan, W. "A Qualitative Study of the Early Work Experiences of Recent Graduates in Engineering." Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, 2008.
9. Schön, D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
10. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic, 1983.
11. Schön, D. "The new scholarship requires a new epistemology." Change, 27 (6), 1995, 26-34.
12. Van de Ven, A. H. and Johnson, P. E. "Knowledge for theory and practice." Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 2006, 802-821.
13. Raclin, J. A. "Toward an epistemology of practice." Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6 (2), 2007, 495-519
14. Booth, W. C, Colomb, G. G. and Williams, J. M. The craft of research. The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
15. An interview with Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams authors of The Craft of Research, 2nd edition. http://www.press. uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/065685in.html (Accessed March 20, 2008)
16. Borrego, M., Streveler, R. A., Miller, R. L. and Smith, K. A. "A new paradigm for a new field: Communicating representations of engineering education research." Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (2), 2008, 147-162.
17. Toulmin, S. E. The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
18. Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C, and Johnson, Writing Arguments: A rhetoric with readings, concise edition, 4th edition. Longman, 2006.
19. National Science Foundation Directorate for Education & Human Resources Division of Undergraduate Education. Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program Solicitation, NSF 08-546, 2008.
20. Redish, E. F. "Discipline-based education and education research: The case of physics." Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21 (1), 2000, 85-96.