Discipline-Based Education and Education Research: The Case of Physics

Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 85-96

  Redish, Edward F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041409957     PISSN: 01933973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00052-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Arons A. A guide to introductory physics teaching. 1990;Wiley, New York.
2. Byrnes J.P. Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts. 1996;Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
3. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses American Journal of Physics. 66:1998;64-74.
4. Halloun, I. (1997). Views about science and physics achievement: The VASS story. In E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, College Park, MD, July 31-August 3, 1996, AIP Conf. Proc. 399 (pp. 605-614). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
5. Hammer D. Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction. 12:1994;151-183.
6. Hestenes D. Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics. 60:1992;732-748.
7. Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhammer G. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher. 30(3):1992;141-158.
8. Krause P.A., Shaffer P.S., McDermott L.C. Using research on student understanding to guide curriculum development. An example from electricity and magnetism AAPT Announcer. 25(December):1995;77.
9. McDermott L.C. A view from physics. Gardner M.et al. Toward a scientific practice of science education. 1990;3-30 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. McDermott L.C., Redish E.F. Resource letter PER-1. Physics Education Research American Journal of Physics. 67:1999;755-767.
11. National Science Education Standards. (1995). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. (1989). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Redish E.F. Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics. 61:1994;796-803.
14. Redish, E. F. (1996). New models of physics instruction based on physics education research. Didaktik der Physik: Vorträge, Physikertragung (pp. 51-66). Jena.
15. Redish, E. F., & Rigden, J. S. (1997), (Eds.). The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, College Park, MD, July 31-August 3, 1996, AIP Conf. Proc. 399. Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
16. Redish E.F., Saul J.M., Steinberg R.N. Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics. 66:1998;212-224.
17. Redish, E. F., Steinberg, R. N., & Saul, J. M. (1997). The distribution and change of student expectations in introductory physics. In E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, College Park, MD, July 31-August 3, 1996, AIP Conf. Proc. 399 (pp. 689-698). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
18. Rigden, J. (1997). The emergence of the technical workplace and its consequences. In E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), The changing role of physics departments in modern universities: Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, College Park, MD, July 31-August 3, 1996, AIP Conf. Proc. 399 (pp. 133-138). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
19. Steen L. Calculus for a new century, a pump not a filter. 1988;Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC.