Quasi-synchronous grammars: Alignment by soft projection of syntactic dependencies

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Statistical Machine Translation, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 23-30

  Smith, David A ^a   Eisner, Jason ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS; CONTEXT FREE LANGUAGES; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EXPERIMENT LEARNING; LANGUAGE MODEL; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; PARSE TREES; QUASI-SYNCHRONOUS; SOURCE LANGUAGE; SYNCHRONOUS CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS; SYNCHRONOUS GRAMMARS; SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES; TRANSLATION PROCESS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 78650698764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. H. Alshawi, S. Bangalore, and S. Douglas. 2000. Learning dependency translation models as collections of finite state head transducers. CL, 26(1):45-60.
2. P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. CL, 19(2):263-311.
3. Y. Ding and M. Palmer. 2005. Machine translation using probabilistic synchronous dependency insertion grammars. In ACL, pages 541-548.
4. B. J. Dorr. 1994. Machine translation divergences: A formal description and proposed solution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):597-633.
5. J. Eisner. 2003. Learning non-isomorphic tree mappings for machine translation. In ACL Companion Vol.
6. H. J. Fox. 2002. Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. In EMNLP, pages 392-399.
7. D. Gildea. 2003. Loosely tree-based alignment for machine translation. In ACL, pages 80-87.
8. D. Gildea. 2004. Dependencies vs. constituents for tree-based alignment. In EMNLP, pages 214-221.
9. R. Hwa, P. Resnik, A. Weinberg, and O. Kolak. 2002. Evaluating translational correspondence using annotation projection. In ACL.
10. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In ACL, pages 423-430.
11. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2004. Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: Models of dependency and constituency. In ACL, pages 479-486.
12. P. Koehn. 2002. Europarl: A multilingual corpus for evaluation of machine translation. http://www.iccs.informatics.ed.ac.uk/pkoehn/- publications/europarl.ps.
13. A. Lavie, S. Vogel, L. Levin, E. Peterson, K. Probst, A. F. Llitjós, R. Reynolds, J. Carbonell, and R. Cohen. 2003. Experiments with a Hindi-to-English transfer-based MT system under a miserly data scenario. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 2(2):143-163.
14. I. D. Melamed, G. Satta, and B.Wellington. 2004. Generalized multitext grammars. In ACL, pages 661-668.
15. I. D. Melamed. 2004. Statistical machine translation by parsing. In ACL, pages 653-660.
16. F. J. Och and H. Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. CL, 29(1):19-51.
17. C. Quirk, A. Menezes, and C. Cherry. 2005. Dependency treelet translation: Syntactically informed phrasal SMT. In ACL, pages 271-279.
18. S. M. Shieber and Y. Schabes. 1990. Synchronous treeadjoining grammars. In ACL, pages 253-258.
19. D. Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. CL, 23(3):377-403.
20. K. Yamada and K. Knight. 2001. A syntax-based statistical translation model. In ACL.