Teacher education in changing times: A systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 797-803

  Gebhard, Meg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650689491     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5054/tq.2010.237335     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education: An International Research Journal, 16(3), 298-318. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003.
2. Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M., & Otei'za, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8-24.
3. Aguirre-Munoz, Z., Park, J., Amabisca, A., & Boscardin, C. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs' writing instructional needs: A case for systemic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1/2), 295-323. doi: 10.1080/15235880802640755.
4. Bourke, J. (2005). The grammar we teach. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 4, 85-97.
5. Brisk, M., & Zisselsberger, M. (2010). ''We've let them in on a secret'': Using SFL theory to improve the teaching of writing to bilingual learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
6. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
7. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing. London: Falmer Press.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). No Child Left Behind and school reform. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 642-669.
9. Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Sydney, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
10. Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M., & Cox, B. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 247-273. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3803_1.
11. Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney, Australia: AMES.
12. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417. doi: 10.2307/3588114.
13. Gebhard, M., Habana Hafner, A., & Wright, M. (2004). Teaching English language learners the language game of math. InMichaelSadowski (Ed.), Teaching immigrant and second-language learners (pp. 33-46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
14. Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Reclaiming recess in urban schools: The potential of systemic functional linguistics for ELLs and their teachers. Language Arts, 84(5), 419-430.
15. Gebhard, M., & Martin, J. (2010). Grammar and literacy learning. D. Fisher & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English Language Arts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
16. Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra, A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers' professional development, and ELLs' academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 91-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
17. Gibbons, P. (2007). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom. Students, teachers, and researchers. London: Continuum.
18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 339-376). London: Longman.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and education. London: Continuum.
20. Hammond, J., & Macken-Horarik, M. (1999). Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 528-543. doi: 10.2307/3587678.
21. Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.
22. Hyland, K. (2007). Language, literacy, and writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.
23. Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.
24. Lucas, T. (2010). Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
25. Luke, A. (1996). Genres of power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan & A. G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 308-338). London: Longman.
26. Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). ''Something to shoot for'': A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in the secondary schools. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom (pp. 17-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
27. Macken-Horarik, M. (2009). Navigational metalanguages for new territory in English: The potential of grammatics. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 55-69.
28. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
29. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
30. McCarthey, C. (2008). The impact of No Child Left Behind on teachers' writing instruction. Written Communication, 25(4), 462-505. doi: 10.1177/0741088308322554.
31. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Davison, C. (2001). English as a second language in the mainstream. Harlow, England: Longman.
32. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social features. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
33. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86-123). London: Longman.
34. Schleppegrell, M. (2003). Grammar for writing: Academic language and the ELD Standards. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California's Linguistic Minorities Research Institute.
35. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Schleppegrell, M., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21-27.
37. Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & Otei'za, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 67-93. doi: 10.2307/3588259.
38. Schleppegrell, M., & de Oliveira, L. (2006). An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 254-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.003.
39. Shin, D.-S., Gebhard, M., & Seger, M. (2010). Weblogs and academic literacy development: Expanding audiences and linguistic repetoires. In M. Dantas-Whitney & S. Rilling (Eds.), Authenticity in the language classroom and beyond: Children and Adolescent Learners (pp. 99-111). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
40. Whittaker, R., O'Donnell, M., McCabe, A. (Eds.) (2006). Language and literacies: Functional approaches. London: Continuum.