College Rankings as an Interorganizational Dependency: Establishing the Foundation for Strategic and Institutional Accounts

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-23

  Bastedo, Michael N ^a   Bowman, Nicholas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

College; Institutional theory; Institutions; Organizations; Rankings; Resource dependence; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650521750     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bastedo, M. N. (2004, August). Strategic decoupling: Building legitimacy in educational policy environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
3. Bastedo, M. N. (2005). The making of an activist governing board. Review of Higher Education, 28, 551-570.
4. Bastedo, M. N. (2007). Bringing the state back in: Promoting and sustaining innovation in public higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 61, 155-170.
5. Bastedo, M. N. (2009a). Conflicts, commitments, and cliques in the university: Moral seduction as a threat to trustee independence. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 354-386.
6. Bastedo, M. N. (2009b). Convergent institutional logics in public higher education: State policymaking and governing board activism. Review of Higher Education, 32, 209-234.
7. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2010). The U. S. News and World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. American Journal of Education, 116, 163-184.
8. Bastedo, M. N., & Gumport, P. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U. S. public higher education. Higher Education, 46, 341-359.
9. Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
10. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
11. Bernstein, M. (2000). Controlling Hollywood: Censorship and regulation in the studio era. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
12. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
13. Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U. S. News and World Report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50, 415-436.
14. Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (in press). Anchoring effects on world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education.
15. Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U. S. higher education. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
16. Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211-244.
17. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Council for Aid to Education. (2009). Voluntary support of education survey. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www. cae. org/content/pro_data_trends. htm.
19. Crabbe, N. (2009, June 17). On survey, Machen rates UF with Harvard, other Fla. schools low. Retrieved September 28, 2009 from http://bit. ly/y9AAb.
20. Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1-37.
21. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 29, 1-38.
22. DiMaggio, P. J. (1983). State expansion and organizational fields. In R. H. Hall & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 147-161). Beverly Hills: Sage.
23. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U. S. art museums, 1920-1940". In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267-292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Donaldson, L. (1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 57-76). London: Sage.
26. Dutton, J., & Dukerich, J. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
27. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. (1996). Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476.
28. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1-40.
29. Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 312-343.
30. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 397-405.
31. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
32. Goodman, S. R. (2007, April 7). College rankings serve students, Crow and ASU. The Arizona Republic.
33. Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the U. S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review, 26, 244-255.
34. Guler, I., Guillen, M. F., & MacPherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207-232.
35. Hartley, M., & Morphew, C. (2008). What's being sold and to what end? A content analysis of college viewbooks. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 671-691.
36. Hoover, E. (2007, September 7). The 'U. S. News' rankings roll on. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(2), A45.
37. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
38. Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP). (2009). The role and relevance of rankings in higher education policymaking. Washington, DC: IHEP.
39. Jaschik, S. (2007, March 19). Should U. S. news make presidents rich? Inside Higher Ed. Accessed on March 21, 2009 at http://www. insidehighered. com/news/2007/03/19/usnews.
40. Jin, G. Z., & Whalley, A. (2007). The power of information: How do U. S. News rankings affect the financial resources of public colleges? National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 12941. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
41. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
42. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Lederman, D. (2009a, June 3). Manipulating, er, influencing U. S. News. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved September 28, 2009 from http://www. insidehighered. com/news/2009/06/03/rankings.
44. Lederman, D. (2009b, June 9). The best university? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved September 28, 2009 from http://www. insidehighered. com/news/2009/06/09/clemson.
45. Lee, S. (2009, August 19). Reputation without rigor. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved September 28, 2009 from http://www. insidehighered. com/news/2009/08/19/rankings.
46. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
47. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
48. Martins, L. L. (2005). A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16, 701-720.
49. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39, 513-537.
51. McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
52. Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the rankings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U. S. News and World Report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45, 443-461.
53. Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. In Social theory and social structure (pp. 475-490). New York: Free Press.
54. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
55. Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The impact of U. S. News & World Report college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #7227.
56. Morse, R., & Flanigan, S. (2008). How we calculate the rankings. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://bit. ly/1GDd20.
57. National Science Foundation. (2008). Survey of research and development expenditures at universities and colleges. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/srvyrdexpenditures/.
58. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
59. Peterson, M. W. (1985). Emerging developments in postsecondary organization theory and research: Fragmentation or integration. Educational Researcher, 14, 5-12.
60. Pfeffer, J. (2003). Introduction to the classic edition. In reprint of the external control of organizations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
61. Pfeffer, J. (2005). Developing resource dependence theory: How theory is affected by its environment. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds of management: The process of theory development (2nd ed., pp. 436-459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
63. Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 747-775.
64. Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29-44.
65. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795-843.
66. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
67. Sauder, M. (2006). Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory and Society, 35, 299-321.
68. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63-82.
69. Sauder, M., & Fine, G. A. (2008). Arbiters, entrepreneurs, and the shaping of business school reputations. Sociological Forum, 23, 699-723.
70. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
72. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
74. Stevens, M. L. (2007). Choosing a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
75. Stevens, M. L., Armstrong, E. A., & Arum, R. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 127-151.
76. Thacker, L. (2005). College unranked: Ending the college admissions frenzy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
77. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
78. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-843.
79. Tolbert, P. S. (1985). Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 1-13.
80. Toma, J. D., Dubrow, G., & Hartley, J. M. (2005). The uses of institutional culture: Strengthening identification and building brand equity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81. Volkwein, J. F., & Grunig, S. D. (2005). Resources and reputation in higher education: Double, double, toil and trouble. In J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands (pp. 246-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
82. Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47, 129-148.
83. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 202-228.