Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores

Higher Education

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 431-444

  Bowman, Nicholas A ^a   Bastedo, Michael N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Anchoring effects; Global competition; Higher education; Institutional reputation; University rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952106538     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9339-1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2010). The U. S. News and World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. American Journal of Education, 116, 163-184.
2. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (in press). College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Research in Higher Education.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
5. Bowden, R. (2000). Fantasy higher education: University and college league tables. Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 41-60.
6. Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Getting on the front page: Organizational reputation, status signals, and the impact of U. S. News and World Report on student decisions. Research in Higher Education, 50, 415-436.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Chapman, G. B., & Bornstein, B. H. (1996). The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519-540.
9. Crabbe, N. (2009, June 17). On survey, Machen rates UF with Harvard, other Fla. schools low. The Gainesville Sun. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://bit. ly/y9AAb.
10. Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D., & Enders, J. (2008). Disseminating the right information to the right audience: Cultural determinants in the use (and misuse) of rankings. Higher Education, 55, 373-385.
11. Davis, H. L., Hoch, S. J., & Ragsdale, E. K. E. (1986). An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal predictions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 25-37.
12. Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross- national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49(4), 495-533.
13. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Reaching for the brass ring: The U. S. News & World Report rankings and competition. Review of Higher Education, 26, 145-162.
14. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. (1996). Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476.
15. Englich, B. (2006). Blind or biased? Justitia's susceptibility to anchoring effects in the courtroom based on give numerical representations. Law & Policy, 28, 497-514.
16. Englich, B. (2008). When knowledge matters-differential effects of available knowledge in standard and basic anchoring tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 896-904.
17. Englich, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the court room. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1535-1551.
18. Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 188-200.
19. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1-40.
20. Gottlieb, B. (1999, September 1). Cooking the school books: How U. S. News cheats in picking its "best American colleges." Slate. Retrieved November 19, 2009, from http://www. slate. com/id/34027/.
21. Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the U. S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decisions of high-ability students: 1995-2004. Economics of Education Review, 26, 244-255.
22. Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The impact of league tables and ranking system on higher education decision making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19, 1-24.
23. Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21, 193-215.
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
25. Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP). (2007). College and university ranking systems: Global perspectives and American challenges. Washington, DC: Author.
26. Janiszewski, C., & Uy, D. (2008). Precision of the anchor influences the amount of adjustment. Psychological Science, 19, 121-127.
27. Joyce, E., & Biddle, G. (1981). Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inference in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 19, 120-145.
28. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
29. Kroth, A., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). International university rankings: A critical review of the methodology. Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 11, 542-558.
30. Lee, S. (2009, August 19). Reputation without rigor. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://www. insidehighered. com/news/2009/08/19/rankings.
31. Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 131-142.
32. McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39, 513-537.
33. Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the rankings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the U. S. News and World Report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45, 443-461.
34. Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The impact of U. S. News & World Report college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions (Working Paper #7227). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
35. Mussweiler, T. (2001). The durability of anchoring effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 499-509.
36. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 135-167). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
37. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1038-1052.
38. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142-1150.
39. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84-97.
40. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). New York: Wadsworth.
41. Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829-872.
42. Salmi, J., & Saroyan, A. (2007). League tables as policy instruments: Uses and misuses. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19, 1-39.
43. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63-82.
44. Sauder, M., & Fine, G. A. (2008). Arbiters, entrepreneurs, and the shaping of business school reputations. Sociological Forum, 23, 699-723.
45. Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70, 898-920.
46. Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2003). Academic ranking of world universities-2003. Retrieved November 23, 2009, from http://www. arwu. org/ARWU2003. jsp.
47. Sponsler, B. (2009). The role and relevance of rankings in higher education policymaking. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
48. Stake, J. E. (2006). The interplay between law school rankings, reputations, and resource allocations: Ways rankings mislead. Indiana Law Journal, 82, 229-270.
49. Tight, M. (2000). Do league tables contribute to the development of a quality culture? Football and higher education compared. Higher Education Quarterly, 54(1), 22-42.
50. Turner, D. R. (2005). Benchmarking in universities: League tables revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 31(3), 353-371.
51. Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
52. Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2006). A world of difference: A global survey of university league tables. Toronto, ON: Educational Policy Institute.
53. van Dyke, N. (2005). Twenty years of university report cards. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 103-125.
54. Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47, 129-148.
55. Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., Colella, M. J., & Alton, A. O. (1984). Anchoring in the detection of deception and leakage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 301-311.