Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form?

Language Awareness

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 261-279

  Philp, Jenefer ^a   Walter, Susan ^a   Basturkmen, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Corrective feedback; Focus on form; Foreign language pedagogy; Interaction; Output; Second language learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650368833     PISSN: 09658416     EISSN: 17477506     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2010.516831     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, R. (2004). Peer-peer interactions: Implications for second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
2. Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
3. Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(1), 325-345.
4. Brooks, F., Donato, R., & McGlone, V. (1997). When are they going to say 'it' right? Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 524-541.
5. Cao, Y.-Q. (2009). Understanding the notion of interdependence, and the dynamics of willingness to communicate (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
6. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Ellis, R. (Ed.) (2005). Planning in task-based performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1-23.
9. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430.
10. Freiermuth, M., & Jarrel, D. (2006).Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189-212.
11. García Mayo, M., & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 38(1), 35-58.
12. Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611.
13. Hancock, M. (1997). Behind classroom code switching: Layering and language choice in L2 learner interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 217-235.
14. Iwashita, N. (1999). Tasks and learners' output in nonnative-nonnative interaction. In K. Kanno (Ed.), Studies on the acquisition of Japanese as a second language (pp. 31-53). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
15. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on corrective feedback and modified output in non-native - non-native interaction. System, 29(2), 267-287.
16. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73-93.
17. Lesser, M. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
18. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. McDonough, K. (2004). Peer-peer interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224.
20. Mitchell, R., & Martin, C. (1997). Rote learning, creativity, and 'understanding' in classroom foreign language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 1-27.
21. Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 536-550.
22. Musumeci, D. (1996). Teacher-learning negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 286-325.
23. Nuevo, A., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (in press). Task complexity, modified output, and learning in learner-learner interactions. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Philp, J., & Mackey, A. (2010). Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. Monograph on interaction and language learning in foreign language contexts. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(1), 245-266.
26. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437-470.
27. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task productions: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
28. Robinson, P. (2007).Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. GarcíaMayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7-26). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
29. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007) Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 161-176.
30. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave.
31. Seliger, H., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Skehan, P. (2007). Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55-70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Bellier, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as ameans of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.
35. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 369-391.
36. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.
37. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
38. Tognini, R. (2008). Interaction in languages other than English classes inWestern Australian primary and secondary schools: Theory, practice and perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.
39. Tognini, R., Philp, J., & Oliver, R. (2010). Rehearsing, conversing, working it out: Second language use in peer interaction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 28.1-28.25.
40. Williams, J. (2001). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 303-346.