Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses

Computers and Education

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 642-649

  Lonn, Steven ^a   Teasley, Stephanie D ^a   Krumm, Andrew E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributed learning environments; Improving classroom teaching; Interactive learning environments; Post secondary education; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

EQUIPMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; SURVEYS;

TEACHING;

EID: 78650178708     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. T. Anderson Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 4 2 2003 9 14 Available http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/149
2. C.J. Ansorge, and O. Bendus The pedagogical impact of course management systems on faculty, students, and institution R.H. Bruning, C.A. Horn, L.M. PytlikZillig, Web-based learning: What do we know? Where do we go? 2003 Information Age Publishing Greenwich, CT 169 190
3. P. Arroway, E. Davenport, G. Xu, and D. Updegrove EDUCAUSE core data service: Fiscal year 2009 summary report 2010 North Carolina State University EDUCAUSE Available http://net.educause.edu/apps/coredata/reports/2009/
4. R.M. Bernard, P.C. Abrami, E. Borokhovski, C.A. Wade, R.M. Tamin, and M.A. Siurkes A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education Review of Educational Research 79 3 2009 1243 1289 10.3102/0034654309333844
5. T. Browne, M. Jenkins, and R. Walker A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom Interactive Learning Environments 14 2 2006 177 192 10.1080/10494820600852795
6. A.W. Chickering Commuting versus resident students 1974 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
7. H. Coates, R. James, and G. Baldwin A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning Tertiary Education and Management 11 1 2005 19 36 10.1007/s11233-004-3567-9
8. L. Gilbert, and D.R. Moore Building interactivity into web courses: tools for social and instructional interaction Educational Technology 38 3 1998 29 35
9. E. Hamuy, and M. Galaz Information versus communication in course management systems Computers & Education 54 1 2010 169 177 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.001
10. P. Hanson, and R. Robson Evaluating course management technology: A pilot study 2004 EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin, Issue 24 Boulder, CO Available http://www.educause.edu/library/ERB0424
11. J.G. Hedberg, and L.C. Ping Charting trends for e-learning in Asian schools Distance Education 25 2 2004 199 213 10.1080/0158791042000262148
12. P. Herse, and A. Lee Optometry and WebCT: a student survey of the value of web-based learning environments in optometric education Clinical and Experimental Optometry 88 1 2005 46 52 Available http://www.optometrists.asn.au/ freestyler/files/ceo881046.pdf
13. Holm, C., Röllinghoff, A., & Ninck, A. (2003). WebCT and elearning in Switzerland Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on New Educational Environments, Luzerne. 139-143. Available http://www.hsw.fhso.ch/ holm/WebCT%20in%20CH.pdf
14. K.-L.D. Krause Social involvement and commuter students: the first-year student voice Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition 19 1 2007 27 45 Available http://fyesit.metapress.com/content/1R2376R6U0W53987
15. S. Liaw, and H. Huang Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: a review of the literature Educational Technology 40 3 2000 41 45
16. S. Lonn, and S.D. Teasley Saving time or innovating practice: investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems Computers and Education 53 3 2009 686 694 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
17. D.A. Luke Multilevel modeling Vol. 143 2004 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA
18. L.P. Macfadyen, and S. Dawson Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system" for educators: a proof of concept Computers & Education 54 2 2010 588 599 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.008
19. R. Maslowski, A.J. Visscher, and B. Collis The formative evaluation of a web-based course-management system within a university setting Educational Technology 40 3 2000 5 19
20. B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies 2009 Report for the US Department of Education Available http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
21. M.G. Moore Three types of interaction American Journal of Distance Education 3 2 1989 1 6 10.1080/08923648909526659
22. M.G. Moore, and G. Kearsley Distance education: A systems view 1996 Wadsworth Publishing Company Belmont, CA
23. G. Morgan Faculty use of course management systems Vol. 2 2003 Educause Center for Applied Research Boulder, CO Available http://www.educause.edu/ library/ERS0302
24. L.V. Morris, C. Finnegan, and S. Wu Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses The Internet and Higher Education 8 3 2005 221 231 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009
25. P. Northrup A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction Educational Technology 41 2 2001 31 39
26. J.F. O'Flahavan Second graders' social, intellectual, and affective development in varied group discussions about literature: An exploration of participation structure Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1989 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
27. S. Ozkan, and R. Koseler Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: an empirical investigation Computers & Education 53 4 2009 1285 1296 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011
28. C.R. Pace Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future 1979 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
29. C.R. Pace Measuring the quality of college student experiences 1984 Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of Los Angeles Los Angeles
30. R.E. Parker, A. Bianchi, and T.Y. Cheah Perceptions of instructional technology: factors of influence and anticipated consequences Educational Technology & Society 11 2 2008 274 293 Available http://www.ifets.info/ journals/11-2/20.pdf
31. E. Pascarella How college affects students: ten directions for future research Journal of College Student Development 47 5 2006 508 520 Available http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal-of-college-student-development/v047/47. 5pascarella.pdf
32. E. Pascarella, P.B. Duby, and B.K. Iverson A text and reconceptualization of a theoretical model of college withdrawal in a commuter institution setting Sociology of Education 56 2 1983 88 100 Available http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2112657
33. E. Pascarella, P.T. Terenzini, and G. Blimling The impact of residential life on students C. Schoeder, P. Mable, Associates Realizing the educational potential of residence halls 1994 Jossey-Bass San Francisco 22 52
34. J.M. Roschelle, R.D. Pea, C.M. Hoadley, D.N. Gordin, and B.M. Means Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology 10 2 2000 76 101 Available http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/10-02- 03.pdf
35. J. Silvio, C. Rama, and M.T. Lago La educación superior virtual en américa latina y el caribe 2004 Unión de Universidades de América Latina; Comités Interinstitucionales para la Evaluación de la Educación Superior; UNESCO/IESALC México, D.F. Available http://www.iesalc.unesco.org.ve//dmdocuments/biblioteca/libros/ EducVirtual-ALC.pdf
36. B.M. Smith The personal development of the commuter student: what is known from the comparisons with resident students? An ERIC review Community College Review 17 1 1989 47 56 10.1177/009155218901700107
37. S.D. Smith, and J.B. Caruso The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010 2010 EDUCAUSE Boulder, CO Available http://www.educause.edu/Resources/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/217333
38. T. Yohon, D. Zimmerman, and L. Keeler An exploratory study of adoption of course management software and accompanying instructional changes by faculty in the liberal arts and sciences Electronic Journal of e-Learning 2 2 2004 313 320 Available http://www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue2/v2-i2-art8-yohon.pdf