Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: Latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 187-199

  Colautti, Robert I ^a   Maron, John L ^b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biogeographical comparisons; Clinal variation; Common garden; EICA; Evolution of invasive species; Introduced plants; Latitudinal gradients

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650944249     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00053.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abramoff M D, Magelhaes P J, Ram S J. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 2004, 11:36-42.
2. Barrett S C H, Colautti R I, Eckert C G. Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:373-383.
3. Blossey B, Nötzold R. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 1995, 83:887-889.
4. Blows M W, Hoffman A A. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 2005, 86:1371-1384.
5. Bossdorf O, Prati D, Auge H, Schmid B. Reduced competitive ability in invasive non-indigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 2004, 83:887-889.
6. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers W E, Siemann E, Prati D. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 2005, 144:1-11.
7. Bradshaw W E, Holzapfel C M. Genetic response to rapid climate change: it's seasonal timing that matters. Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:157-166.
8. Connover D O, Schultz E T. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1995, 10:248-252.
9. Cox G W. Alien Species and Evolution 2004, Island Press, Washington
10. Crawley M J. What makes a community invasible? Colonization, Succession, and Stability 1987, 429-453. Gray A JCrawley M JEdwards P J. eds, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
11. Cristescu M E A, Hebert P D N, Witt J D S, MacIsaac H J, Grigorovich I A. An invasion history for Cercopagis pengoi based on mitrochondrial gene sequences. Limnology and Oceanography 2001, 46:224-229.
12. DeWalt S J, Denslow J S, Hamrick J L. Biomass allocation, growth and photosynthesis of genotypes from native and introduced ranges of the tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Oecologia 2004, 138:521-531.
13. Endler J A. Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines 1977, Princeton University Press, Princeton
14. Endler J A. Natural Selection in the Wild 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton
15. Franks S J, Pratt P D, Dray F A, Simms E L. Selection on herbivory resistance and growth rate in an invasive plant. The American Naturalist 2008, 171:678-691.
16. Friedman J H, Roelle J E, Gaskin J F, Pepper A E, Manhart J R. Latitudinal variation in cold hardiness in introduced Tamarix and native Populus. Evolutionary Applications 2008, 1:598-607.
17. Genton B J, Kotanen P M, Cheptou P O, Adolphe C, Shykoff J A. Enemy release but no evolutionary loss of defence in a plant invasion: an inter-continental reciprocal transplant experiment. Oecologia 2005, 146:404-414.
18. Grosholz E D, Ruiz G M. Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates. Ecology Letters 2003, 6:705-710.
19. Gurevitch J, Hedges L V. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 1999, 80:1142-1149.
20. Huey R B, Gilchrist G W, Carlson M L, Berrigan D, Serra L. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 2000, 287:308-309.
21. Huggett R J. Fundamentals of Biogeography 2004, 2nd edn, Routledge, Oxfordshire
22. Kaufman S R, Smouse P E. Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 2001, 127:487-494.
23. Keller S R, Taylor D R. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:852-866.
24. Kollman J, Bañuelos M J. Latitudinal trends in growth and phenology of the invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera (Balsaminaceae). Diversity and Distributions 2004, 10:377-385.
25. Lambrinos J G. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 2004, 85:2061-2070.
26. Lande R, Arnold S J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
27. Langlet O. Two hundred years genecology. Taxon 1971, 20:653-721.
28. Lee C E. Rapid and repeated invasions of fresh water by the saltwater copepod Eurytemora affinis. Evolution 1999, 53:1423-1434.
29. Lee C E, Remfert J L, Chang Y M. Response to selection and evolvability of invasive populations. Genetica 2007, 129:179-192.
30. Leger E, Rice K J. Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition. Ecology Letters 2003, 6:257-264.
31. Maron J L, Vilà M, Arnason J. Loss of enemy resistance among introduced populations of St. Johns wort (Hypericum perforatum). Ecology 2004a, 85:3243-3253.
32. Maron J L, Vilà M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecological Monographs 2004b, 74:261-280.
33. Maron J L, Elmendorf S, Vilà M. Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range. Evolution 2007, 61:1912-1924.
34. Meyer G, Clare R, Weber E. An experimental test of the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis in goldenrod, Solidago gigantea. Oecologia 2005, 144:299-307.
35. Montague J L, Barrett S C H, Eckert C G. Re-establishment of clinal variation in flowering time among introduced populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, Lythraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2008, 21:234-245.
36. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004, 19:417-422.
37. Neuffer B, Hurka H. Colonization history and introduction dynamics of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) in North America: isozymes and quantitative traits. Molecular Ecology 1999, 8:1667-1681.
38. Novak S J, Mack R N. Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): comparison between native and introduced populations. Heredity 1993, 71:167-176.
39. Novak S J, Mack R N. Tracing plant introduction and spread: genetic evidence from Bromus tectorum (Cheatgrass). BioScience 2001, 51:114-122.
40. Reznick D N, Ghalambor C K. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 2001, 112:183-198.
41. Sakai A K, Allendorf F W, Holt J S, Lodge D M, Molofsky J, With K A, Baughman S. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2001, 32:305-332.
42. Schluter D. Evolution along lines of least resistance. Evolution 1996, 50:1766-1774.
43. Shapiro S S, Wilk M B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965, 52:591-611.
44. Siemann E, Rogers W E. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:514-518.
45. Siemann E, Rogers W E. Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:1503-1507.
46. Stockwell C A, Hendry A P, Kinnison M T. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2003, 18:94-101.
47. Taylor D R, Keller S R. Historical range expansion determines the phylogenetic diversity introduced during contemporary species invasion. Evolution 2007, 61:334-345.
48. Thébaud C, Simberloff D. Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? The American Naturalist 2001, 157:231-236.
49. Weber E, Schmid B. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. American Journal of Botany 1998, 85:1110-1121.
50. Widmer T L, Guermache F, Dolgovskaia M Y, Reznik S Y. Enhanced growth and seed properties in introduced vs. native populations of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Science 2007, 55:465-473.
51. Williams J L, Auge H, Maron J L. Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens. Oecologia 2008, 157:239-248.
52. Willis A J, Blossey B. Benign environments do not explain the increased vigour of non-indigenous plants: a cross-continental transplant experiment. Biocontrol Science and Technology 1999, 9:567-577.