Towards individualized dialogue support for ill-defined domains

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 357-379

  Weerasinghe, Amali ^a   Mitrovic, Antonija ^a   Martin, Brent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Meta cognitive skills; tutorial dialogues

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650147815     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K. R., & Cross, K. (1999). Tutoring answer explanation fosters learning with understanding. In S. Lajoie & M. Vivet, M. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp 199-206). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Koedinger, K. R. (2001). Towards tutorial dialogue to support self-explanation: Adding natural language understanding to a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 246-255.
3. Aleven, V., Ogan, A., Popescu, O., Torrey, C., & Koedinger, K. R. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of a tutorial dialogue system for self-explanation. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicario & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 443-454). Berlin: Springer.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the Mind. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: The search of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 3-16.
6. Chen, P. (1976). The ER model - Toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions Database Systems, 1(1), 9-36.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in Instructional Psychology (pp. 161-238). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Chi, M., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
9. th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
10. Freedman, R., Rose, C. P., Ringenberg, M. A., & VanLehn, K. (2000). ITS tools for natural language dialogue: A domain-independent parser and planner. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 433-442). Berlin: Springer.
11. Gertner, A. & VanLehn, K. (2000). ANDES: A coached problem-solving environment for physics. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 133-142). Berlin: Springer.
12. Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1988). Motivating the notion of generic design with information processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, 10, 19-36.
13. Goel, V. & Pirolli, P. (1992). The Structure of Design Problem Spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 395-429.
14. Graesser, A., Person, N., & Magliano, J. (1995). Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 359-387.
15. Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Kreuz, R., & the Tutoring Research Group (1999). AUTOTUTOR: A simulation of a human tutor. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 35-51.
16. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K., Rose, C., Jordan, P., & Harter, D. (2001). Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue, AI Magazine, 22(4), 39-51.
17. Jackson, G. T., Ventura, M., Chewle, P., Graesser, A. C., & the Tutoring Research Group (2004). The impact of Why/AutoTutor on learning and retention of conceptual physics. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicario & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 501-510). Berlin: Springer.
18. Jordan, P. W., Makatchev, M., Pappuswamy, U., Vanlehn, K., & Albacete, P. (2006). A natural language tutorial dialogue system for physics. In G. Sutcliffe & R. Goebel (Eds.) Proc. FLAIRS 2006, (pp. 521-526) Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.
19. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Process, 25 (2-3), 259-284.
20. Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J. L. (1993). Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer-based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry (Eds.) Computer as Cognitive Tools. (75-105). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Raney, M., & Trafton, J. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 277-305.
22. Milik, N., Marshall, M., & Mitrovic, A. (2006). Teaching logical database design in ERM-Tutor. In M. Ikeda & K. Ashley (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 707-709). Berlin: Springer.
23. Millis, B., Evens, M., & Freedman, R. (2004). Implementing directed lines of reasoning in an intelligent tutoring system using the Atlas planning environment. Proc. Information Technology (pp. 729-733), Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
24. Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238-256.
25. Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., & Weerasinghe, A. (2004). DB-suite: Experiences with three intelligent, web-based database tutors. Interactive Learning Research, 15(4), 409-432
26. Mitrovic, A., & Weerasinghe, A. (2009). Revisiting the ill-definedness and the consequences of ITSs. In Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 375-382) Amsterdam: IOS Press.
27. Reitman, W. R. (1964). Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems. In M. W. Shelly & G. L. Bryan (Eds.) Human Judgements and Optimality (pp. 282-315). New York: Wiley.
28. Rose, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., & Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In J. D. Moore (Ed.) Proc. Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 256-266). Amsterdam: IOS Press
29. Rose, C. P., Kumar, R., Aleven, V., Robinson, A., and Wu. C. (2006). CycleTalk: Data driven design of support for simulation based learning, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2), 195-223.
30. Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2002). KERMIT: a constraint-based tutor for database modelling. In S. Cerri, G. Gouarderes & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 377-387). Berlin: Springer.
31. Suraweera, P., & Mitrovic, A. (2004). An intelligent tutoring system for entity relationship modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligent in Education, 14 (3-4), 375-417.
32. De Vicente, A., & Pain, H. (2002). Informing the detection of the students' motivational state: An empirical study. In S. A. Cerri, G. Gouarderes, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 933-943). Berlin: Springer.
33. Weerasinghe, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2006a). Facilitating deep learning through self-explanation in an open-ended domain. Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems, 10(1), 3-19.
34. Weerasinghe, A., & Mitrovic, A. (2006b). Individualizing self-explanation support for ill-defined tasks in constraint-based tutors. In V. Aleven, K. Ashley, C. Lynch & N. Pinkwart (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 Workshop on ITS for Ill-defined Domains (pp. 56-64). Jhongli, Taiwan.
35. Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Feedback micro-engineering in EER-Tutor. In C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg & J. Breuker (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (pp. 718-725). Amsterdam: IOS Press.