Implementing directed lines of reasoning in an intelligent tutoring system using the atlas planning environment

International Conference on Information Technology: Coding Computing, ITCC

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 729-733

  Mills, Bruce ^a   Evens, Martha ^b   Freedman, Reva ^c  

^a University of the Southwest   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIRECT RESPONSE (DR); INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS (ITS); REFLEX RESPONSES (RR); SOCRATIC TUTORING;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; SYNTACTICS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 3042546366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITCC.2004.1286554     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Brandle, S.S., & Evens, M.W. (1997). Acknowledgments in tutorial dialogue. Proceedings of MAICS '97. Dayton, OH, June. 13-18.
2. Cawsey, A. (1992). Explanation and interaction: The computer generation of explanatory dialogues. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Cawsey, A. (1993). Planning interactive explanations. International Journal of Man-machine Studies. 38(2), 169-200.
4. Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J.A., and Kulik, C.C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19:237-248.
5. Fox, B.A., (1993). The Human Tutorial Dialog Project: Issues in the design of instructional systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey
6. Freedman, R. (1999). Atlas: A plan manager for mixed-initiative, multimodal dialogue. Proc. AAAI Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligence, Orlando.
7. Freedman, R. (2000a). Plan-based dialogue management in a physics tutor. Proceedings of the Sixth Applied Natural Language Processing Conference. Seattle, WA. 52-59.
8. Freedman, R. (2000b). Using a reactive planner as the basis for a dialogue agent. Proceedings of FLAIRS 2000, Orlando, FL. 203-208.
9. Freedman, R. (2001). An approach to increasing programming efficiency in plan-based dialogue systems. In J.D. Moore, C.L. Redfield, and W.L. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 200-209.
10. Glass, M., Kim, J.H., Evens, M., Michael, J.A., & Rovick, A.A. (1999). "Novice vs. expert tutors: A comparison of style." Proceedings of MAICS 99, Bloomington, IN, April 24. 43-49.
11. Hume, G., Michael, J.A., Rovick, A.A., & Evens, M. (1996a). Hinting as a tactic in one-on-one tutoring. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 23-47.
12. Mills, B. (2001). Using the Atlas Planning Engine to Drive an Intelligent Tutoring System: CIRCSIM-Tutor Version 3, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium (FLAIRS-2001), Key West, FL, 211-215.
13. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V.E., Martin, V., King, A., and Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27:91-109.
14. Rosé, C.P., Di Eugenio, B., and Moore, J.D., (1999). A dialogue based tutoring system for basic electricity and electronics. In Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education.
15. Rosé, C. P., Moore, J. D., VanLehn, K., and Allbritton, D., (2001). A Comparative Evaluation of Socratic versus Didactic Tutoring, Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, August 2001.
16. Sanders, G. (1995). Generation of explanations and multi-turn discourse structures in tutorial dialogue based on transcript analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL